Full Order Text
Order 1 · 25 May 2022 · CNR MHMM180001532021
Order Details: Copy of Interim Maintenance Order Pdf Text: C. C. No. 4 DV 2021 Chandrakala Vs Ravindra CNR-MHMM18-000153-2021 ORDER BELOW EXH.3 1. Perused record. Heard both the sides. 2. This is an application under Section 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, hereinafter referred as D.V. Act. 3. As per applicant her marriage with the respondent Mr. Ravindra Yadav, solemnized on 30.05.2001. Out of said marriage two children i.e. Applicant Nos.2 and 3, born. Initially everything was fine, but later on differences occurred which resulted in various acts of domestic violence caused by respondent against applicants. Respondent is having illicit relations. Respondent caused various acts of emotional and physical violence, as narrated in the main application. He is earning good income but not paid anything to the applicants for earning their livelihood. Thus, the respondent also caused economic violence. 4. In his reply respondent denied all these allegations and contended that he has taken care of all the applicants and ready to proceed with relationship. Applicant herself on instigation of her parental relations abused and assaulted him and also caused various acts of emotional violence. She is insisting to reside separately from joint family and creating issues. He has no separate means of income. He earns meager income from juice centre. As such application is not tenable and should be dismissed. 5. Considering adverse pleadings of both the parties, their submissions, etc. I framed following points and recorded my findings on each of them as follows for the reasons discussed below- POINTS FINDINGS 1. Does from the material on record applicant succeeded in making out prima facie case of commission of domestic violence against her by the respondent ? ..In the affirmative. -- 1 of 3 -- C. C. No. 4 DV 2021 Chandrakala Vs Ravindra CNR-MHMM18-000153-2021 2. Whether applicant is entitled for the relief of interim maintenance as prayed for ? ...In the affirmative. 3. What order ? ..Appln. is partly allowed R E A S O N S 6. The pleadings of both the parties are supported by affidavits. The applicant in addition to it filed on record certain documents. The documents particularly various N.C. reports, applications and photographs, etc. clearly reflect that respondent caused various acts of domestic violence. It is also admitted that though applicant is residing with the respondent, he has not made any arrangement for her survival of their children. Thus, he is also causing economic violence. Against it, respondents except bare denials by way of his say and affidavit raised no concrete defence, from which it can be said that the stand of the applicant can be disbelieved. The assets and liability affidavits and facts admitted by the respondent also proves that applicant has no means of income and respondent is earning from the juice business. The conduct of the respondent from whole record reflects the fact that respondents taking no care of the day to day requirements of the applicants. Thus, it is clear that the respondent committed various acts of domestic violence against the applicants. Therefore, I recorded my findings on Point Nos. 1 and 2, in the affirmative. Considering the facts pleaded pertaining to income of respondent and material on record in support of it I am of the opinion that following order will serve the cause of justice, therefore, order - ORDER a. The application is partly allowed. b. The respondent Ravindra Pralhad Yadav, is herewith directed to pay the interim maintenance of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees Five Thousand) per month to the applicant and Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand) per month to each of their children, Master Ameet Ravindra Yadav and Aditya -- 2 of 3 -- C. C. No. 4 DV 2021 Chandrakala Vs Ravindra CNR-MHMM18-000153-2021 Ravindra Yadhav, i.e. total amount of Rs.11,000/- per month, from the date of application till the decision of the main application towards interim maintenance. c. The copy of this order shall be given free of costs to both the parties and if Respondent failed to comply the order the applicant is directed to file separate application bearing separate number for recovery of arrears. MUMBAI (KOMALSING RAJPUT) DATE – 25.05.2022 M.M., 12TH COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI -- 3 of 3 --
