Skip to main content
Police Case PW

Bandra Police StationVsMohammad Rafiq Hasan Shaikh@ Katodi Irfan

CNR MHMM18000146202412-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 12TH COURT
Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Disposed Otherwise
Decision Date: 06th February 2024

TrustJury record updated 29 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1200212/2024
Registration Date
03 Jan 2024

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Bandra Police Station

    Respondent

    1. 1Mohammad Rafiq Hasan Shaikh@ Katodi Irfan

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Indian Penal Code · Sec 379

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Bandra P.Stn.
    FIR Number / Year
    1563/2023

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 15-01-2024
Business: P.O. is deputed to attend jail Visit.
Charge is with Ld. M.M. 32nd Court, Bandra. Mumbai.
Matter is adjourned on same stage till next date.
Next Purpose: CUSTODY CASES
Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2024

Date: 29-01-2024
Business: Called. APP present. Accused not produced. His advocate present.
Adj for production of accused.
Next Purpose: CUSTODY CASES
Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2024

Date: 06-02-2024
Business: Called. APP present.
Accused produced through V.C.
 His advocate Ms. Vaidahi L.A.D.C. present.
Heard Ld. APP and advocate for accused on charge.
Order passed below Exh-1.
Accused is discharged. Proceeding disposed off.
Nature Of Disposal: Disposed Otherwise
Disposal Date: 06-02-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 7000212/2024
Filing Date: 03-01-2024
First Hearing Date: 15th January 2024
Decision Date: 06th February 2024
Court Number And Judge: 12-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 12TH COURT

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    06 Feb 2024

    Order Details: Order Below EX 1 Pdf Text: C. C. No. 212 PW 2024 State Vs Mohd. Rafique CNR-MHMM18-000146-2024 ORDER BELOW EXH.1 1. Perused record. Accused produced through video conferencing. On his behalf advocate Miss Vaidehi Pusalkar, L.A.D.C., present. 2. During V.C. accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Ld. Advocate for the accused submitted that there is no sufficient material on record to frame the charge against the accused. He is in custody since the month of…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.