Full Order Text
Final Order 2 · 19 Nov 2024 · CNR MHMM160266682024
Order Details: Copy of Bail Order Pdf Text: COMMON ORDER BELOW BAIL APPLICATIONS IN C. C. NO. 1453/BA/2024 AND 1502/BA/2024 IN C. C. NO. 1234/PW/2024 OF NEHRU NAGAR POLICE STATION 1. The accused Sri. Singh @ Sensopol Singh and Preetam Kundan Singh have moved these second applications for praying to release themselves on bail under section 437 of the Cr.P.C. 2. Read the applications and say filed below it by A.P.P. 3. The A.P.P. has strongly objected these applications on the grounds that the offence punishable under section 420 r/w. 34, 120(B) of IPC is registered against the accused which the charge levelled against accused are serious in nature and having punishment of 7 years. The amount involvement in this crime is of Rs. 7,56,000/- that is huge amount. The accused No.3 who introduced himself to the informant as officer of MHADA and they will sell her flat at Chembur in low price of Rs. 32,00,000/-. If the accused are released on bail they will again commit similar nature of offence and they will abscond as well as they will never attend the court. 4. The learned Advocate for the accused Pritam Kundan Oswal submitted that he is falsely implicated in this matter and has nothing to do with the said offence. He is innocent and nothing to do with the commission of offence. Nothing will be gained by the detained the said accused in judicial custody. He is law abiding citizen and hail from respectable family with deep roots in the society. He is ready to abide any condition impose by this court. He is only earning member of his family. The learned Advocate for the accused submitted that he will abide by the terms and conditions imposed by this Court if the prayer as set out in the application is granted. 5. The Ld. Advocate for the accused Sensorpal Singh submitted that he belongs to respectable family having deep roots in the -- 1 of 4 -- --- 2 --- society. He is permanent resident of Mumbai and only earning member of his family. The accused is law abiding citizen and he does not have any criminal antecedent against him. The said accused undertakes not to hamper or tamper the prosecution evidence and to co-operate with the police as well as court. The charge-sheet has been filed on 01/10/2024. He is ready to abide by any condition imposed by this court. He also submitted that he is currently suffering from intraparenchymal Haemorrhage (IPH). The said decease be disrupt or compress adjacent brain tissue leading to neurological dysfunction. Medical advise strongly recommends that he avoid stress due to severity of his condition. He is suffering from the same since 15/03/2020 and he is in-continuous medication. 6. On perusal of FIR and the documents filed alongwith the charge- sheet and the arguments advanced it transpires that the accused No.1 Pritam Oswa alongwith accused No.2 Sensorpol Singh cheated the informant to the tune of Rs. 7,56,000/- and for that purpose created forged document of allotment of room of MHADA and also prepared false challen. 7. It further transpires that the present accused sent e-mail from the mail address amit.joshi@mumbaisra.co.in and informed him that the SRA authority received his amount and for that purpose the accused forged the lobo of SRA and stamp. Therefore, the informant believed the accused. 8. Further the accused No.1 Pritam has also cheated other persons i.e. Ajit Salunke for Rs. 4,50,000/-, Manoj Gupta for Rs. 7,00,000/-, Vilas Kate for Rs. 4,50,000/-, Atanu Mukharji for Rs. 20,70,000/-. 9. The accused filed various medical papers and sought bail on medical ground also. Hence I have called the report from the Superintendent of Thane Jail and doctor of said jail as to ill- -- 2 of 4 -- --- 3 --- ness of the said accused. Accordingly this court received the e- mail from the Thane prison alongwith the accused’s medical report and covering letter. Accordingly, the doctor reported that the accused is known case of CVST with past history of superior sagittal venous thrombosis. However, he also reported that the prisoner has no any fresh complaint. The treatment is continued at prisoner hospital. There is no need to refer to higher center and he is hermodynamically stable at present. Therefore, the said medical report of the accused No.2 Sensorpol Singh shows that there are no fresh complaints by him in respect of the said disease even at the prison the medical treatment is continued. It is not alleged that the said treatment is incomplete or requires reference to higher medical authority. In fact he has no fresh complaints of any medical condition. Therefore, considering the said medical report, I am of the considered opinion that the accused No.2 is not entitled to release on bail on medical ground. 10.Further, the accused Sensorpol Singh moved similar bail application No. 1127/BA/2024 which came to be rejected on merit for order dated 28/08/2024. On perusal of the previous bail application and when compared with the present bail application I found that the contentions and ground raised in this application are similar to the previous bail application. The second bail application is maintainable only on the ground of change circumstances. The accused has not made out any ground of change circumstances which entitles him to be released on bail. 11.The charge-sheet shows that the accused are involved in the serious offence punishable under Section 420, 467, 471 r/w 34 of the IPC. -- 3 of 4 -- --- 4 --- Both the accused alongwith other absconding accused duped the informant to the tune of Rs. 7,56,000/- and for that purpose created forged MHADA documents. He further submits that in the bank account statement of accused No. 1 it revealed that the present accused received the amount from him. Further as stated above the accused No.1 has also cheated other persons under the pretext of giving room in SRA. 12. Such contentions in the First Information Report alongwith the other documents, statement and the charge-sheet prima facie shows involvement of both the accused in the alleged crime. Yet the amount received by the accused persons from the informant is not recovered. They have not co-operated with the investigation. If released on bail they may cause to disappear the said amount and its trail. More so, considering nature of the offence if released on bail they will try to pressurize and threaten the informant. Therefore, there is no substance in the present application so that the present application is devoid of merits and liable to be rejected. In the result, I proceed to pass following order. -: O R D E R :- 1) The application is hereby rejected. Date :- 19/11/2024 Place:-Vikhroli. Sd/-. (Ajay A. Bhatewara) Judicial Magistrate (First Class) 34th Court, Vikhroli, Mumbai. -- 4 of 4 --
