Skip to main content
Misc cases

Ramesh Laxman ChekkapellyVsRajani Tiwari +3 more

CNR MHMM1600340720234-Judicial Magistrate First Class Court 50
Vikhroli, MM Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--REJECTED
Decision Date: 15th July 2023

TrustJury record updated 09 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
717/2023
Registration Date
06 Apr 2023

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    5

    Petitioner

    1. 1Ramesh Laxman Chekkapelly

    Respondent

    1. 1Rajani Tiwari
    2. 2Naina Ramesh Chekkpaelly
    3. 3Ritesh Fasate
    4. 4Pooja Ritesh Fasate

    Acts & Sections

    2
    CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE · Sec 156
    Indian Penal Code · Sec 383 · 420 · 504 · 506(ii) r/w 34

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 04-05-2023
Business: Complainant present.  Advocate for complainant present
Adjourned for argument.
Next Purpose: MISC.  /NOTICES/ I and R
Next Hearing Date: 16-05-2023

Date: 16-05-2023
Business: Complainant present
Advocate present
Adjourned for argument on process issue
Next Purpose: MISC.  /NOTICES/ I and R
Next Hearing Date: 16-06-2023

Date: 16-06-2023
Business: Applicant present with advocate
Advocate for applicant argued on process issue.
Argument heard.
Adjourned for argument if any and order.
Next Purpose: MISC.  /NOTICES/ I and R
Next Hearing Date: 15-07-2023

Date: 15-07-2023
Business: Complainant present
Advocate absent
Order below Exh. 1
Complaint is rejected.
Nature Of Disposal: REJECTED
Disposal Date: 15-07-2023

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 3000/2023
Filing Date: 06-04-2023
eFiling Number: AMH20230015979C202300004
eFiling Date: 05-04-2023
First Hearing Date: 04th May 2023
Decision Date: 15th July 2023
Court Number And Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate First Class Court 50

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    15 Jul 2023

    Order Details: copy of Order Pdf Text: 1 ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT1, IN C.C. NO. 717/M/2023 Perused the complaint and heard Learned Counsel for complainant. It is contention of the complainant that, the relation between complainant and respondent No. 1, as husband and wife, respectively was acrimonious after their marriage. The criminal proceeding was initiated by respondent No. 1 at Chandrapur, wherein the complainant and his relatives got anticipatory bail. It is contention of complainant that, respondents try to harass complainant…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.