Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 16 Oct 2025 · CNR MHMM150109852025
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (62nd COURT), DADAR, MUMBAI. Appl. No. 2116/Misc./2025 Adil Sorab Mogrelia V/s. The State of Maharashtra ORDER BELOW EXH. 01 1] Read the application and say. Investigating officer in his reply has given the details of 196 bank accounts and freezed total an amount of Rs. 4,67,804.12/- (Four Lakh sixty seven thousand eight hundred four and twelve paise only ) and requested to pass necessary order with respect to the amount claimed by the applicant. 2] By this application applicant requested to return an amount of Rs. 4,67,804/- ( Four Lakh sixty seven thousand eight hundred four only). Perused the photocopies of documents on record. It seems that present applicant has lodged FIR and reported the fact of cheating to the police. This itself shows that before incident amount was with the applicant/informant. Moreover, he has filed copy of FIR in support of the application. 3] On perusal of record, it transpires that police filed their say dtd. 16/10/2025 which shows that applicant transferred an amount of Rs.56,20,000/- in different bank accounts. Out of which, an amount of Rs. 4,67,804.12/- (Four Lakh sixty seven thousand eight hundred four and twelve paise only ) came to be freezed from different bank accounts with the help of Nodal officers of the concerned bank. 4] Considering the facts and documents on record, it seems, the applicant has better right to get interim custody of Rs. 4,67,804/- (Four Lakh sixty seven thousand eight hundred four only). Therefore, after gone through say of I.O the applicant is entitled to get interim custody of Rs. 4,67,804/- ( Four Lakh sixty seven thousand eight hundred four only). Hence, the application is allowed. Hence, order; ORDER 1) The application is allowed. 2) The investigating officer is directed to issue letter to the concerned bank to defreeze the -- 1 of 3 -- 2 amount of Rs. 4,67,804/- ( Four Lakh sixty seven thousand eight hundred four only) as per police report dtd. 16/10/2025 and it be transferred in the account of applicant till the conclusion of the trial on executing indemnity bond of Rs. 4,67,804/- ( Four Lakh sixty seven thousand eight hundred four only) before the Court. 3) The concerned bank is directed to transfer frozen amount lying with respondent banks as per report/reply dtd.16/10/2025 of Investigating Officer in the account of the applicant. 4) The applicant shall deposit an amount of Rs. 4,67,804/- ( Four Lakh sixty seven thousand eight hundred four only) in the Court as and when required. 5) The Investigating Officer is directed to produce the indemnity bond and panchanama if any in the court, if charge-sheet filed. (Nilesh N. Dhend) Judicial Magistrate First Class Dt: 16/10/2025 62nd Court, Dadar, Mumbai. -- 2 of 3 -- 3 Perused theapplication and say filed by I.O and APP. This application is filed by accused for return of muddemal prepr seized in C.R No. 115/2025 by the Cyber Police station, Worli. Allegations agaisnt the accused are seen through FIR and the say of investigating officer. This is case of misused of credit cards in the name of the informant wherein the applicant have transacted over various sites rom the cerdit card of the ifnoramnt. Accused was previous employee of the informant and previously authorised to use the said card for purpose , direted by the informant. Subsequetly, through her phone the said credit card was registered, as alleged and misued. On persual of say it seen that, said mobille was ent for CA at Kalina, Mumbai. Investiation officer has storng objection to return the said mobile. 02. Ld Advocate for the accused submitted that, said mobile has purcahsed from the applicant on online through Amazon and she is pyaing installment of the said mobile and have filed the bills and accounts extract of the applicant t supper his contention. On going through the contentions it is seen that, ater purchased of mobile the transaction had taken place and under such circusmtan when the mobile was used for commission of offence it is a primary evidence and therefore, it cannot be returned back -- 3 of 3 --
