Skip to main content
Miscellaneous Cases

SUNIL SITARAM SHETEVsCYBER REGION WORLI POLICE STATION and 39 ors +15 more

CNR MHMM15006206202562-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 62th Court
Dadar Bhoiwada, MM Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Application Allowed
Decision Date: 09th September 2025

TrustJury record updated 06 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1615/2025
Registration Date
17 Jul 2025

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

17

Petitioner

  1. 1SUNIL SITARAM SHETE

Respondent

  1. 1CYBER REGION WORLI POLICE STATION and 39 ors
  2. 2HDFC Bank
  3. 3BANK OF BARODA
  4. 4ICICI Bank
  5. 5BANK OF INDIA
  6. 6State Bank of India
  7. 7AIRTEL PAYMENTS BANK
  8. 8Karur Vysya Bank
  9. 9Federal Bank
  10. 10ESAF Small Finance Bank
  11. 11Jammu and Kashmir Bank
  12. 12South Indian Bank
  13. 13Axis Bank
  14. 14Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd
  15. 15Indian Overseas Bank
  16. 16Indian Bank

Acts & Sections

3
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita · Sec 503
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita · Sec 204 · 205 · 308(2) · 318(4) · 319(2) · 336(2) · 336(3) · 338 · 340(2) · 61(2)
Information Technology Act · Sec 66(D)

Police / FIR Details

Police Station
CYBER POLICE STATION (CENTRAL REGION)
FIR Number / Year
21/2025

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 17-07-2025
Business: Adv. for applicant present.
Complainant filed today.
Ex.01. Complaint.
Order passed thereon.
Issue notice to respondents.
Adj.to.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 30-07-2025

Date: 30-07-2025
Business: Adv. for applicant present.
Adv. for respondent no.14,25 and 27 are present.
Ex.02. Police report.
Ex.03. Undertaking filed by adv. for res. no.14
Ex.04.Undertaking filed by adv. for res. no.25
Ex.05. Undertaking filed by adv. for res. no.27.
Case is adj. for filling of say.
Adj.to.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 14-08-2025

Date: 14-08-2025
Business: Adv.for applicant present.
Respondents adv. present.
Ex.06. Application for production of documents filed by adv.
Production is allowed.
Ex.07. Reply of respondent no.6 HDFC Bank Ltd. filed today
Ex.08, Reply of respondent no.4 and 14 ICICI Bank.filed today.
Ex.09. Reply of respondent no.39. Indian Overses Bank filed today.
Ex.10. V.P filed by adv. for res. no.39.
Ex.11. Undertaking filed by adv. for res nos.12,13,17,18,20,22,23 and 35.
Ex.12. Adj. application filed by adv. for res. no.25 today.
Case is adj. for filling of say of respondents.
Adj.to.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2025

Date: 21-08-2025
Business: Complainant present with adv.
Exh- 7 Replay on behalf of the Respondent
Federal bank Ltd.
Order- R & R
EXh -8 Application for Extention of time of file reply on behalf for respondent No-25
EXh -9 Say/ Reply of the
 Respondent No-16, 21 & 31
EXh- 10 Application for Adjourment
Order- Allowed
adj for
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 28-08-2025

Date: 28-08-2025
Business: Ld. JMFC is on half day leave. Court charge with Ld. ACJM 5th court.
Board is discharged.
Adj to.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 09-09-2025

Date: 09-09-2025
Business: Applicant absent. adv. for applicant present.
Adv. for respondent not.25,27 and 39 are present.
Ex.13. Say filed by adv. for respondent no.25
Say also filed by adv. for respondent no.27.
Argument heard today by adv. for applicant.
Hence, Order passed below Ex.01.
Application is allowed.
Proceeding be closed.
Nature Of Disposal: Application Allowed
Disposal Date: 09-09-2025

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 1611/2025
Filing Date: 17-07-2025
eFiling Number: AMH20230042534C202500008
eFiling Date: 17-07-2025
First Hearing Date: 17th July 2025
Decision Date: 09th September 2025
Court Number And Judge: 62-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 62th Court

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
09 Sept 2025

Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (62nd COURT), DADAR, MUMBAI. Appl. No. 6201615/Misc./2025 Sunil Sitaram Shete V/s. The State of Maharashtra and 39 Others ORDER BELOW EXH. 01 1] Read the application and say. Investigating officer in his reply has given the details of 39 bank accounts freezed and requested to pass necessary order with respect to the amount claimed by the applicant. Whereas Ld. APP requested to pass appropriate order. 2] Notice was issued to…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.