Skip to main content
SUMMONS CASES SS - SUMMOND CASES SS

ADITYA BIRLA FINANCE LTD.VsAshish Mohan Pawar

CNR MHMM1400634920213-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 18TH COURT
Girgaon, MM Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Decision Date: 11th December 2021

TrustJury record updated 07 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1803974/2021
Registration Date
10 Feb 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1ADITYA BIRLA FINANCE LTD.

    Respondent

    1. 1Ashish Mohan Pawar

    Acts & Sections

    2
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138 · 141 · 142
    Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 · Sec 25

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 23-08-2021
Business: Complainant present with Adv. Complainant filed appln. for substitution of complainant alongwith Affidavit of complainant and Letter of authority. Order passed below Exh. 1. Appln. allowed. Adj. for consideration and Verification.
Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
Next Hearing Date: 11-12-2021

Date: 11-12-2021
Business: Complainant present with Adv. Matter settled between parties amicably out of Court, hence, permission granted to complainant to withdraw complaint. Order passed below Exh. 1. Complaint is withdraw. Case disposed off.
Nature Of Disposal: LOKADALAT
Disposal Date: 11-12-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 610411/2021
Filing Date: 10-02-2020
First Hearing Date: 23rd August 2021
Decision Date: 11th December 2021
Court Number And Judge: 3-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 18TH COURT

    Orders

    3
    Final Order 2
    11 Dec 2021
    Order Details: Copy of Order
Pdf Text: -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    23 Aug 2021
    Order Details: Copy of Order
Pdf Text: ORDER PASSED BELOW EXH.- 1
1. Perused application also gone through record.
2. Present application is moved for substitution of authorized
representative of complainant. It is contented that the earlier representative
Jayashri Kudale is unable to represent complainant company henceforth. Hence,
present application for substitution of complainant company.
3. Perused copy of resolution dated 16th March 2021 which shows that
Mr. Prajendra Dattatraya Gaikwad is empowered to be authorized representative
of complainant company. Complainant company is juridical person, hence, needs
to be represented by a natural person. Hence, application is allowed.
Sd/-
(Smt. D. P. Kaduskar)
Place : Girgaon, Mumbai Metropolitan Magistrate,
Date : 23/08/2021 18th Court, Girgaon, Mumbai.
-- 1 of 2 --
-- 2 of 2 --
    Order 1
    23 Aug 2021
    Order Details: Copy of Order
Pdf Text: ORDER PASSED BELOW EXH.- 1
1. Perused application also gone through record.
2. Present application is moved for substitution of authorized
representative of complainant. It is contented that the earlier representative
Jayashri Kudale is unable to represent complainant company henceforth. Hence,
present application for substitution of complainant company.
3. Perused copy of resolution dated 16th March 2021 which shows that
Mr. Prajendra Dattatraya Gaikwad is empowered to be authorized representative
of complainant company. Complainant company is juridical person, hence, needs
to be represented by a natural person. Hence, application is allowed.
Sd/-
(Smt. D. P. Kaduskar)
Place : Girgaon, Mumbai Metropolitan Magistrate,
Date : 23/08/2021 18th Court, Girgaon, Mumbai.
-- 1 of 2 --
-- 2 of 2 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.