Final Order 1

Order Details: Copy of Order - 1
Pdf Text: (C.C.No.1260/Misc./2026)
(C.C.No.1231/PW/2024,
(C.R.No.533/2023) Nagpada
Police Station, Mumbai
ORDER BELOW EXH.1
(State of Maharashtra V/s. Rajkumar Ukchand Bhansali & Ors.)
1. The present application has been moved on behalf of the
applicant No.1 Rajkumar Ukchand Bhansali and applicant No.2 Urmila
Rajkumar Bhansali have seeking permission for renewal of the passport
for ten years. It is claimed that they want to apply for the renewal of
passport. Applicants holding valid passport No.P-2846244 and passport
No.P-2845860 which were expiring on 28/09/2026. They have
regularly attended the court and undertakes to attend the court
henceforth.
2. Ld. APP submitted that the accused applicant have
committed offence punishable under section 498-A, 406, 377, 523, 504,
406 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and submitted to pass an
appropriate order in the matter.
3. Heard both the sides. Perused record.
4. In this respect it is necessary to state here the observation
in
Deepak Dwarkasing Chhabriya Vs. Union Of India reported in
1996(2) Mh. L. J. 877, wherein it has been observed that...
“ Mere pendency of Criminal case is no ground to
reject the application for grant of passport. If the
applicant obtains permission from the Criminal Court
where his case is pending, authority is duty bound
to Issue passport in terms of order of Criminal Court,
subject to conditions of Notification dated 25.08.1993
”.
-- 1 of 2 --
---02---
5. In a case of
Satwant Singh Sawhney Vs. Ramarathnam,
Assistant Passport Officer New Delhi, reported in A.I.R.1967
Supreme Court 1836. Hon'ble Apex Court held that, “ Court can
grant permission for obtaining passport to the accused.”
6. So far as to absconding is concern, as it is mandatory for
the accused to obtain permission of concerned court before travelling
abroad and for that applicants have to move separate application with
detailed travel plan as to their traveling abroad. Hence, in view of this
there is no impediment to allow the application. Hence, following order.
: O R D E R :
1. Application is allowed.
2. This court has no objection for renewal of passport to the
accused-applicant No.1 Rajkumar Ukchand Bhansali and
applicant No.2 Urmila Rajkumar Bhansali for the period of two
years.
3. The accused-applicants shall not leave India without permission
of this court.
4. The applicants are directed to file copy of passports after its
renewal by competent Authority.
5. Inform accordingly after necessary compliance by applicants.
(Order dictated and pronounced in open Court.)
(Smt. S. R. Barge)
Judicial Magistrate (First Class),
Date :- 22/09/2026 69th Court Mazgaon, Mumbai
-- 2 of 2 --