Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHMM12005144202214 Jun 2022
Sewri, MM Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 14 Jun 2022 · CNR MHMM120051442022

Order Details: Copy of Order - 1
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 69TH
COURT, MAZGAON, MUMBAI
C.C.No.6901035/MISC/2022
CR.No.437/2019
Mohd. Mohasinbhai Abdulla
Vahora
Vs.
Police Station Nagpada
ORDER PASSED BELOW EXH.1:
1. Perused the application and say of Ld.APP.
2. The Ld. APP has objected the application to hand over
interim custody of seized passports to the Applicant. Ld. APP submitted
that the present application is vague in nature. The copy of F.I.R. in
which the said documents are seized is not filed along with this
application. Further the present application have not any rights or locus
standi to have custody of passport of his wife. Also the seized passports
are material evidence for proving the guilt of the accused and is
necessary for identification hence. Hence, application be rejected. After
giving suffering opportunities the investigation officer has failed to file
his say.
3. On the basis of report given by informant,
Cr.No.437/2019 was registered at Police Station. The wife of the
applicant has given no objection for return of passport to the applicant.
Chargesheet has been filed in the present case. Till today no one has
claimed seized passport except the Applicant. Purpose of identification
during trial would be served if detailed panchanama of the seized
property is prepared. Considering all these facts, the applicant is
entitled to the interim custody of seized passports as prayed in the
application. Hence, following order
-- 1 of 2 --
02
ORDER
1. Application is partly allowed.
2. Police Station Officer of Nagpada Police Station is directed
to handover interim custody of seized passports bearing No.G
3457005 (Mohammad Mohsinbhai Abdillah Vahora and passport No.M
2447002 (Samimbanu Mohsinbhai Vahora wife of appliant) to the
applicant on executing supurtnama of Rs.20,000/.
3. The Applicant is directed not to alienate or change the
nature of seized passport till disposal of the case and produce the same
whenever directed by court.
4. The I.O. is directed to take photographs of the passport. He
is further directed to prepare detailed panchanama of the passport and
furnish it along with report.
5. Inform accordingly.
Mazgaon, Mumbai .
Date : 14/06/2022 (Shri. S. H. Gaherwar)
Metropolitan Magistrate,
69th Court Mazgaon , Mumbai
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.