Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 12 Jan 2026 · CNR MHMM120000042026
Order Details: Copy of Order - 1 Pdf Text: - 1 of 3 - (C.C. No.2-MISC-2026) IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 46TH COURT, MAZGAON, MUMBAI. C.C. No.2-MISC-2026 IN C.C. NO.4600133/PW/2020 (C.R. NO.03/2019 OF AGRIPADA POLICE STATION) Kanku Vishram Padam … The applicant. Vs. The State. (Through – PS Agripada) … The Respondent. ORDER BELOW EXH.1 Present application filed by accused namely Kanku Vishram Padam for seeking permission to re-issue/renewal of passport for 10 years. It is contended that she along with other accused has been charged for the offences punishable under 143, 147, 149, 323, 324, 326, 504, 427 of the IPC. The charge-sheet has been filed by PS. Agripada vide C.C. No.4600133/PW/2020 against them. She has further contended that, the validity of her passport bearing No.N6576751 will expire on 26.01.2026. She has further submitted that, he has to travel to Dubai for religious purpose and also to meet her relatives there. Therefore, as the validity of her passport is expired, she wants to apply for re-issuance of passport, however, the Passport Authority asking to obtain the permission from the Court. Hence, she filed this application for granting a permission to re- issue/renewal the passport. 2. Say of I.O. and learned APP was called. The I.O. has filed his say (Exh.4) and submitted to reject the application. The learned APP scribed her say overleaf the application and objected that, if permission is granted there is every possibility that, the applicant will flee away and delay will be caused for conducting trial. -- 1 of 3 -- - 2 of 3 - (C.C. No.2-MISC-2026) 3. Heard the both the sides and gone through application and affidavit of the applicant and also perused the relevant record and proceeding. 4. It is pertinent to mention here that, PS. Agripada has filed charge-sheet against the accused and other accused vide C.C. No. 4600133/PW/2020 for offences mentioned supra. This Court has also gone through the relevant provisions of Passport Act, 1967 and Passport Rules, 1980. In the said enactments, there are no guidelines for issuance of such type of directions. However, for issuance of passport, there is a clause restraining passport authority in case a criminal case is pending against the applicant. Yet, parameters for issuing No Objection or issuing direction to concerned authority by the concerned criminal Court are not given. 5. In this case, the learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon very recent judgment of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Sangram Ashok Swami Vs. Regional Passport Office, Pune & Ors. 2022 ALL M.R. (Cri.) 1664, in which, the Hon’ble High Court has directed the passport authorities to renew the petitioner’s passport for 10 years, in accordance with the Passport Rules and Regulations thereunder. 6. The learned counsel for the applicant has also relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Telangana High Court in the case of Mahendra Kumar Agarwal Vs. The Union of India & Ors. decided on 27.03.2024 in WP No.7873 of 2024, in which the Hon’ble High Court has directed the Passport Authorities to pass the appropriate orders for renewal/re- issuance of passport for a period 10 years as per the Passport Act and -- 2 of 3 -- - 3 of 3 - (C.C. No.2-MISC-2026) Rules and Regulations thereunder. 7. The applicant wants to obtain passport for the purpose to travel abroad for religious purpose and to meet her relatives there. It is worthwhile to mention here that the applicant is resident of Mumbai. Therefore, there is no possibility of absconding of this accused. Moreso, the applicant has submitted that, she is ready to abide by any condition imposed by the Court. Considering the said provisions of Passports Act and the ratio referred in authority cited supra, this Court is of the opinion that there is no impediment on this Court to grant permission to the applicant to re-issue of passport, subject to undertaking and certain conditions. In view thereof, this Court is of the opinion that application deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to pass following order. ORDER 01. The application is allowed. 02. The Passport Authority, Mumbai is hereby directed to re-issue passport to the applicant for 10 Years (Ten Years), in accordance with the Passport Rules and Regulations thereunder. 03. The applicant/accused shall produce before this Court immediately the copy of the passport if issued to him. 04. The applicant shall not travel outside India without prior permission of the appropriate Court. 05. Application is disposed of accordingly. Date : 12.01.2026 ( P. P. Deshmukh ) Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), 46th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai. RRRT. -- 3 of 3 --
