Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 24 Jul 2026 · CNR MHMM110103272026
Order Details: Order below Ex-1 Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, 3RD COURT, ESPLANADE, MUMBAI. Misc. Case No.2380/MISC/2026 (CNR NO.MHMM11-010327-2026) IN C. C. No.10/PW/2004 Santosh Mahadeo Sawant ... Applicant / Accused V/s CBI. SC-II. New Delhi. ... Respondent / Complainant ORDER BELOW EXH. 1 1. The present application is filed by applicant/accused No.3 namely Santosh Mahadeo Sawant, seeking permission to travel abroad to Malaysia from 01.08.2026 to 20.08.2026. 2. It is submitted by the applicant that, the applicant is businessman and is a permanent resident of State of Maharashtra. He is original accused No.3 in this case i.e. Case No. 10/PW/2004 for offence punishable under Sections 386, 384, 341 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. He has been released on bail by the Hon’ble Special Judge, MCOC Court, Mumbai vide order dated 30.11.2023 passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 2828 of 2023. Since then he remained on bail without any complaint whatsoever regarding his conduct. The applicant has scrupulously complied with all the conditions imposed while granting the bail and has at all times remained available for investigation. 3. The applicant submits that, he has received a formal -- 1 of 5 -- - 2 - invitation from the Malaysian Indian Restaurant Association, Malaysia inviting him to attend a business and industry event scheduled to be held at Kuala Lumper, Malaysia from 01.08.2026 to 20.08.2026 being his standing experience and business interests in the hotel and restaurant industry. Earlier also on one occasion, this court has permitted him to travel abroad as per order dated 23.11.2024 passed in Misc. Application No.4255 of 2024. He has complied with all conditions of the said order. So also, the Hon’ble Special Judge, MCOC Court, Greater Mumbai also permitted him to travel Malaysia from 01.08.2026 to 20.08.2026 Applicant undertakes to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. On these grounds, he urged to allow the application. 4. CBI through Learned APP filed their say vide Exh.5 to this application and strongly objected the application on the grounds that, the applicant/accused is facing serious offences of extortion and was absconded during trial. Applicant was arrested on 18.04.2023 by CBI at Mumbai International Airport while he was returning from Singapore. There is strong possibility that, the applicant may free from the clutches of law and do not return India to face the trial pending against him, if he permitted to go abroad. It would not be in the interest of justice to allow the present application of the applicant at this stage and there is likelihood that the applicant misuses such liberty. On these grounds, APP urged to rejected the application. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant/accused. Learned APP for the CBI. Perused the application, reply filed by CBI vide Exh.5, the earlier order of this Court, order of the Hon’ble Special Judge, MCOC -- 2 of 5 -- - 3 - Court, Greater Mumbai and the material placed on record. 6. It is a settled position of law that, the right to travel abroad is a facet of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India (See: Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597). However, this right is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions, particularly when an accused is facing trial. 7. In the present case, earlier also, on one occasion, the applicant was permitted to travel abroad and he has not violated any condition of the earlier order of this Court and order of the Hon’ble Special MCOC Court, Greater Mumbai. The prosecution has not placed any concrete material on record to substantiate the apprehension that the applicant is likely to abscond, if permission is granted. In the present case, evidence of prosecution witnesses is yet to be commenced. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the willingness of the applicant to abide by stringent conditions, the application deserves to be allowed on merits. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order. ORDER (A) The Application (Exh. No.1) is allowed. (B) The applicant/accused No.3 namely Santosh Mahadeo Sawant is permitted to travel abroad to Malaysia from 01.08.2026 to 20.08.2026 (both days inclusive), subject to the following conditions: 1. He shall furnish a detailed itinerary mentioning his place of stay in Malaysia with complete address, telephone numbers and mobile numbers to the -- 3 of 5 -- - 4 - Investigating Officer as well as to this Court, before his departure. 2. He shall furnish copies of his valid visa and passport to this Court and to the Investigating Officer before departure. 3. He shall intimate the concerned unit of CBI in writing before his departure from India and immediately upon his return to India. 4. In addition to the existing sureties, he shall deposit cash security of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Only) with this Court before departure. If such amount is already deposited in the court as per earlier order, then it shall be continued for the purpose of this order. 5. He shall not dispute his identity in the trial proceedings during his absence from India. 6. He shall furnish contact numbers of two close relatives in India, along with proof of his permanent residence and details of his immovable properties in India, before departure. 7. He shall make himself available physically or through video conferencing as and when required by this Court during his stay abroad. 8. He shall file an undertaking before this Court stating that he shall have no objection to any order being passed in his absence in accordance with law and that he shall make necessary arrangements to proceed with the trial through his advocate. 9. He shall ensure that the progress of the trial is not -- 4 of 5 -- - 5 - hampered due to his absence. 10. In the event of breach of any of the above conditions, the cash security of Rs.2,00,000/- shall stand forfeited to the State and a non-bailable warrant shall be issued against him. 11. He shall comply with all the above conditions and furnish the necessary undertaking before travelling abroad. Failure to do so shall result in automatic cancellation of this permission. 12. He shall intimate this Court and the Investigating Officer immediately upon his arrival back in India. 13. He shall remain present personally or through video conferencing on the date fixed for framing of charge and on all dates when his personal presence is required by the Court. (C) The applicant shall file compliance report along with proof of deposit of cash security and undertakings on or before 31.07.2026. (D) It is clarified that this permission is granted only for the aforesaid period and shall not be treated as a precedent for future travel permissions. Any further request for travel abroad shall be considered on its own merits. Mumbai, (S. S. Budruk) Dated : 24.07.2026 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Esplanade, Mumbai Mbc/- -- 5 of 5 --
