Skip to main content
Civil Suit

Sunil Jwalaprashad VishwakarmaVsTukaram Gundappa Dandin

CNR MHCC0400604020231-1st Additional Principal Judge
Dindoshi, City Civil Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 19th October 2024

TrustJury record updated 05 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
2306/2024
Registration Date
19 Oct 2024

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Sunil Jwalaprashad Vishwakarma

    Respondent

    1. 1Tukaram Gundappa Dandin

    Acts & Sections

    1
    CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 19-10-2024
Business: 19/10/2024 CORAM-H.H.1st Addl.Principal Judge SHRI. R. N. ROKADE
                    (C. R. NO.1)
Stamp No.  6427/2023 (NOB TOB)
The plaintiff and his advocate absent.
Perused the plaint and read the office objection.
It is seen from the office objection that the plaintiff has not paid deficit court fees. Sufficient opportunities were given to the plaintiff to remove the office objection.  Despite of it, the plaintiff failed to remove the office objection.  It seems that the plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the matter.
Hence, I am inclined to pass the following order
Order
1. The plaint stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
2. The suit be register for statistical purpose.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 19-10-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 6427/2023
Filing Date: 04-07-2023
First Hearing Date: 19th October 2024
Decision Date: 19th October 2024
Court Number And Judge: 1-1st Additional Principal Judge

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    19 Oct 2024
    Order Details: Order
Pdf Text: 19/10/2024 CORAM-H.H.1st Addl.Principal Judge SHRI. R. N. ROKADE (C. R.
NO.1) Stamp No. 6427/2023 (NOB TOB) The plaintiff and his advocate absent.
Perused the plaint and read the office objection. It is seen from the office objection that
the plaintiff has not paid deficit court fees. Sufficient opportunities were given to the
plaintiff to remove the office objection. Despite of it, the plaintiff failed to remove the
office objection. It seems that the plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the matter.
Hence, I am inclined to pass the following order Order 1. The plaint stands dismissed
for want of prosecution. 2. The suit be register for statistical purpose.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.