Civil Suit
Saud Abdul MutakabbirVsAbdul Momin Dazbhar and Anr
CNR MHCC0400594820211-2nd Additional Principal Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge
Dindoshi, City Civil Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Decision Date: 08th March 2022
TrustJury record updated 05 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 606/2022
- Registration Date
- 08 Mar 2022
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 08-03-2022
Business: 08/03/2022 CORAM-H.H.2nd Addl.Principal Judge SHRI S.M.BHOSALE
(C. R. NO.1)
St. No. 6368/2021 (by precipe)
Adv. Tripathi for plaintiff present.
Adv. for plaintiff filed an application for returned of the plaint. t.o.r.
Heard ld advocate for plaintiff.
Plaintiff has filed an application for return of plaint under order VII rule 10 of C.P.C. on the ground that the dispute is related to leave and license agreement.
Learned advocate for plaintiff has brought attention of this court on para 9, 10, 11 of the plaint. Further, it is also submitted that suit premises valuation is above Rs. 1 Crore.
Considering all these submissions, this court has no pecuniary jurisdiction.
Hence following order is passed -
ORDER
1) Plaint is returned to the plaintiff as per order X rule 7 of Code of Civil
Procedure to file before appropriate Court.
2) Suit be registered for statistical purpose.
Nature Of Disposal: DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Disposal Date: 08-03-2022Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 6368/2021 Filing Date: 20-09-2021 First Hearing Date: 08th March 2022 Decision Date: 08th March 2022 Court Number And Judge: 1-2nd Additional Principal Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge
Orders
1Final Order 108 Mar 2022
08 Mar 2022
Order Details: Order Pdf Text: 08/03/2022 CORAMH.H.2nd Addl.Principal Judge SHRI S.M.BHOSALE (C. R. NO.1) St. No. 6368/2021 (by precipe) Adv. Tripathi for plaintiff present. Adv. for plaintiff filed an application for returned of the plaint. t.o.r. Heard ld advocate for plaintiff. Plaintiff has filed an application for return of plaint under order VII rule 10 of C.P.C. on the ground that the dispute is related to leave and license agreement. Learned advocate for plaintiff has brought attention of this court on para 9, 10, 11 of the plaint. Further, it is also submitted that suit premises valuation is above Rs. 1 Crore. Considering all these submissions, this court has no pecuniary jurisdiction. Hence following order is passed ORDER 1) Plaint is returned to the plaintiff as per order X rule 7 of Code of Civil Procedure to file before appropriate Court. 2) Suit be registered for statistical purpose. 2nd Addl. Principal Judge -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
