Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01013706201901 Sept 2023
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 01 Sept 2023 · CNR MHCC010137062019

Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement
Pdf Text: ..1.. Summary Civil Suit
No.178/2020
MHCC010137062019 Presented on : 12/12/2019
Registered on : 11/02/2020
Decided on : 01/09/2023
Duration : 03Y 08M 21D
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI
EXHIBIT NO.11
SUMMARY CIVIL SUIT NO.178 OF 2020
Mr. Sayalu Hanmanlu Shahapurkar
of Mumbai, an adult Indian Inhabitant,
Occupation Money Lender, having his office
and residence address at Building No.21-B,
Room No.412, Hiranandani Akruti, Lallubhai
Compound, Mankhurd West, Mumbai-400 043.
]
]
]
]
]
] ..Plaintiff
V/s.
Mr. Sanjay Madhu Pawar,
of Mumbai, an adult Indian inhabitant,
Occupation:- Service, having his residence address
at Ganesh Villa, Room No.3, Opposite to Durga
Mata Mandir, Left-side Galli, Shrikrishna Nagar,
Near to Patrol Pool, Kachore Road, Kalyan East,
Thane-421306. Office address at Brihan Mumbai
Mahanagar Palika, Department : Ghana Kachara
Vyavashthappan Khatte, Designation : Motor Loader
Employee Code No.4110310, S-Ward, B.M.C.
Office, near to Mangatram Petrol Pump, L.B.S. Marg,
Bhandup West, Mumbai-78.
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ..Defendant
Appearance :-
Mr. Balbheem Patil, learned advocate for plaintiff.
None for defendant (
Ex-parte).
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SHAIKH AKBAR SHAIKH JAFAR
COURT ROOM NO.15.
DATE : 01/09/2023.
-- 1 of 6 --
..2.. Summary Civil Suit
No.178/2020
J U D G M E N T
1 This summary suit is filed for recovery of amount of
Rs.1,25,500/- under the demand promissory note. The plaintiff has
come with the case that he had advanced loan of Rs.1,00,000/- to the
defendant, who executed promissory note on 25/05/2019. The
defendant had agreed to pay the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- on demand
alongwith interest at the rate of 18% per annum. However, defendant
did not pay the loan amount, therefore, the plaintiff is entitled for
recovery of amount alongwith interest at the rate of 18% per annum.
2 The writ of summons was served upon defendant vide
Exhibit-05. Inspite of service of summons, defendant failed to appear
before the Court and hence, as per the order in
roznama dated
13/04/2022, suit proceeded ex-parte against defendant.
3 Having regard to the contentions of plaintiff, following
points arise for my determination and I have recorded my findings
thereon for the reasons thereunder :-
POINTS FINDINGS
1 Does the plaintiff prove that the
defendant has executed demand
promissory note of Rs.1,00,000/- ?
Affirmative
2 Does the plaintiff prove that he is
entitled to charge interest as prayed for ?
Partly Affirmative
-- 2 of 6 --
..3.. Summary Civil Suit
No.178/2020
3 Is the plaintiff entitled for the reliefs
sought ?
Partly Affirmative
4 What order ? As per final order.
R E A S O N S
4 In order to substantiate the contentions, the plaintiff
entered the witness box and relied on two documents (Exhibit-08 and
09) under list (Exhibit-07). Heard learned advocate for plaintiff.
As to point Nos.1 to 3 :-
5 The plaintiff has tendered his Claim Affidavit (Exhibit-06)
alongwith documents as per list (Exhibit-07). On perusal of demand
promissory note, it reveals that it bears signature and thumb
impression of the defendant. In consequence of failure to pay the
amount under the demand promissory note, the plaintiff has issued a
notice on 08/08/2019. Thus, the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of
amount under the demand promissory note. The plaintiff is a money
lender having license bearing No.RBE-1121, hence, he is entitled to
recover the amount as a money lender. He also filed another
document related to his license. Thus, there is no reason to disbelieve
the contentions of plaintiff, which remains unchallenged. Hence, suit
deserves to be decreed as per the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2(3)
of the Code of Civil Procedure.
6 There is nothing on record to show that the defendant has
ever paid any amount under the demand promissory note. His absence
-- 3 of 6 --
..4.. Summary Civil Suit
No.178/2020
and omission to appear before the Court on being served with the writ
of summons shows that he has no substantial defence and has
admitted the claim of plaintiff. Therefore, it is established that the
defendant has executed the demand promissory note for
Rs.1,00,000/-.
7 So far as interest is concerned, the plaintiff is claiming
interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the defendant, however, I
am of the view that it is an exorbitant rate of interest. No doubt the
plaintiff has suffered loss in business and profit, due to failure to repay
the amount by the defendant. Had it been paid to the plaintiff as per
demand, he would have invested and would have earned profit
therefrom. Therefore, I am of the view that the plaintiff is entitled for
interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of default i.e. notice
of advocate dated 08/08/2019, till its full realisation. In view of above
discussions, I answer point No.1 in affirmative and point Nos.2 and 3
in partly affirmative.
8 As the defendant has made plaintiff constrained to file the
suit, he is also liable to pay the costs. In the result, I proceed to pass
the following order :-
ORDER
1. Summary Civil Suit No.178/2020, is hereby partly
decreed with costs.
2. Plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of
Rs.1,00,000/- alongwith interest at the rate of 9% per
annum, from the date of default i.e. notice issued by
the advocate of plaintiff on 08/08/2019, till its full
realisation from the defendant.
-- 4 of 6 --
..5.. Summary Civil Suit
No.178/2020
3. Court fees, if any, be refunded as per rule.
4. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
(Judgment dictated and pronounced in open Court)
(Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Jafar)
Judge,
City Civil Court, Greater Bombay
Dated : 01/09/2023 C.R. No.15
Dictated on : 01/09/2023
Typed on : 01/09/2023
Signed on : 01/09/2023
-- 5 of 6 --
..6.. Summary Civil Suit
No.178/2020
“Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order”.
02/09/2023
at about 12.10 p.m.
(Ms. Sonali S. Sawant)
Stenographer (Grade-III)
Name of the Hon'ble Judge : Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Jafar,
Judge, City Civil Court &
Addl. Sessions Judge
Court Room No.15, Gr. Mumbai
Date of pronouncement of Order : 01/09/2023
Order signed by Hon'ble Judge on : 01/09/2023
Order uploaded on : 02/09/2023
at about 12.10 p.m.
-- 6 of 6 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.