EXECUTION APPLN
Shri Anil Rama Kadar, Summ. Suit No 1140 of 2017VsShri-Shankar Eknath Kadam
CNR MHCC010136412019966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 29th January 2021
TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100008/2020
- Registration Date
- 03 Jan 2020
Advocates
0No advocate information is available in this record.
Parties
2Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 14-01-2020 Business: Parties and advocate absent. As Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 21/01/2020. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 21-01-2020 Date: 21-01-2020 Business: Shri B.S.Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff present. Shri Patil prays for issue of Warrant u/o.XXI, Rule 48 of CPC, without issue of notice, stating that the Execution Application is filed within two years of passing of Decree. Hence, issue warrant as prayed for, returnable on 13/04/2020. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 13-04-2020 Date: 13-04-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 28-04-2020 Date: 28-04-2020 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 06-06-2020 Date: 06-06-2020 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 24-06-2020 Date: 24-06-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2020 Date: 13-08-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 30-09-2020 Date: 30-09-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2020 Date: 25-11-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2021 Date: 29-01-2021 Business: Parties and advocates are absent. Record shows that the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has already been issued, and therefore, it will be appropriate to dispose off the present exe.application, by keeping alive the said warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC and by granting liberty to plaintiff to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree, with further liberty to plaintiff to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. In view of this, present Execution Application stands disposed off by keeping alive the warrant U/o.XXI, Rule 48 issued in the matter, till full satisfaction of the decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC, with liberty as stated above. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 29-01-2021
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 113245/2019 Filing Date: 03-01-2020 First Hearing Date: 14th January 2020 Decision Date: 29th January 2021 Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
