NOTICE OF MOTION
Abdul Kadar Yadil ShaikhVsTapas Kumar Das
CNR MHCC0101359320199-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 20th January 2020
TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 104978/2019
- Registration Date
- 27 Dec 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 03-01-2020
Business: Plaintiff present.
Witness with adv. R.S. Mamale with defendant present.
Kept back
Later on at 12 noon.
Advocate Mr. Vyas for Plaintiff present and filed registered Notice of Motion no.4978/2019 with affidavit in support, t.o.r. and submitted that prior to recording cross examination of DW-1 decision of Notice of Motion no.4978/19 is necessary to avoid further complications.
Advocate for Defendant submitted that will file reply to Notice of Motion no.4798/19 on next date because copy of said Notice of Motion is served upon Defendant on 27/12/2019 and the senior lawyer of Defendant who is going to file reply to Notice of Motion is not available. Considering submissions adjourned. Defendants advocate is directed to serve copy of NM reply upon advocate for Plaintiff, so that the time bound matter will proceed at the earliest.
Case is adjourned to 13/01/2020 for reply to Notice of Motion no.4798/19 at 11.00 a.m.
Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
Next Hearing Date: 13-01-2020
Date: 13-01-2020
Business: Advocate Mr. Vyas for Plaintiff present
Advocate Mr. Mhamal for Defendant present and submitted that Defendant is not intending to file NM reply, but Defendant is intending to file written notes of arguments about Notice of Motion no.4978/19 Defendant is directed to serve copy of written notes of arguments of NM upon other side. As requested by advocate for Plaintiff, kept back at 2.45 p.m. for NM hearing.
L.O.
Plaintiff present.
Advocate for Defendant filed written notes of arguments in respect of Notice of Motion no.4978/19, t.o.r.
Case is adjourned to 16/01/2020 for NM for hearing.
Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
Next Hearing Date: 16-01-2020
Date: 16-01-2020
Business: Advocate Mr. Vyas for Plaintiff present
Defendant present.
Court is busy in recording evidence in HC Expedited suit no.2537/13, hence case is adjourned to 20/01/2020.
Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2020
Date: 20-01-2020
Business: Plaintiff with advocate Mr. Vyas present.
Defendant with advocate Mr. R. S. Mhamane for Defendant present
F.R.S.R. following order has passed-
ORDER
Notice of Motion No.4978 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b), subject to cost of Rs.3000/- to be paid by Plaintiff to Defendant. It is made clear that the cost is awarded not as punishment but to discourage Plaintiff from re-opening the trial again and again and as a reminder to every Plaintiff to take care of his own matter because Plaintiff is aways said to be master of suit.
Cost amount of Rs.3000/- is paid by Plaintiff\''s advocate to Defendant for compliance of the order passed by this Court in Notice of Motion no.4978/19.
Case is adjourned to 27/01/2020 for Plaintiffs further examination in chief for proving the documents.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 20-01-2020Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 114401/2019 Filing Date: 27-12-2019 First Hearing Date: 03rd January 2020 Decision Date: 20th January 2020 Court Number And Judge: 9-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 120 Jan 2020
20 Jan 2020
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :COURT 9 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0104978/2019 Abdul Kadar Yadil Shaikh Vs Tapas Kumar Das Date : 20-01-2020 Business : Plaintiff with advocate Mr. Vyas present. Defendant with advocate Mr. R. S. Mhamane for Defendant present F.R.S.R. following order has passed- ORDER Notice of Motion No.4978 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b), subject to cost of Rs.3000/- to be paid by Plaintiff to Defendant. It is made clear that the cost is awarded not as punishment but to discourage Plaintiff from re-opening the trial again and again and as a reminder to every Plaintiff to take care of his own matter because Plaintiff is aways said to be master of suit. Cost amount of Rs.3000/- is paid by Plaintiff&amp#039s advocate to Defendant for compliance of the order passed by this Court in Notice of Motion no.4978/19. Case is adjourned to 27/01/2020 for Plaintiffs further examination in chief for proving the documents. Nature of Disposal : ALLOWED Disposal Date : 20-01-2020 COURT 9 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
