Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 04 Jan 2025 · CNR MHCC010135842019
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: C/S. No.2342/19 (SC No.2022/19) MHCC010135842019 Presented on : 27/12/2019 Registered on : 27/12/2019 Decided on : 04/01/2025 Duration : - Y 5 M 9 D IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER MUMBAI CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.2342 OF 2019 IN SHORT CAUSE SUIT NO. 2022 OF 2019 M/s. Sukanksha Constructions ... Plaintiff - Versus - Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. … Defendant CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. PRASHANT C. KALE CITY CIVIL COURT, GR. BOMBAY (C. R. NO.65) DATE : 04th January, 2025. Appearance :- Mr. R. Y Sapre, Advocate for plaintiff. Mr. Advaid Patel, Advocate for defendant. O R D E R By this chamber summons the plaintiff has prayed for amendment in pleadings as per the provisions of Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Perused affidavit in support, reply filed by defendant and the suit proceeding. Page 1 of 3 -- 1 of 4 -- C/S. No.2342/19 (SC No.2022/19) 2. It is submitted by the plaintiff that he has filed suit for declaration that forfeiture of bank guarantee issued by IDBI Bank Ltd. is illegal. During the pendancy of the suit, defendant has revoked the bank guarantee and accordingly an amount of Rs.4,85,000/-is transferred in the account of defendant on 20.08.2019. The revocation of the bank guarantee is void and has caused financial loss to the plaintiff. Plaintiff is entitled to recover of the said amount of Rs.4,85,000/- from the defendant and therefore it has become necessary to amend the plaint in view of the subsequent events. The defendant has not filed its written statement and therefore no prejudice will be caused to the defendant if amendment is allowed. Hence, this chamber summons. 3. The defendant has filed reply and opposed the chamber summons. It is submitted by defendant that the plaintiff is attempting to change the nature of the suit and by virtue of the present amendment, prayer of recovery is sought by the plaintiff. Defendant further submitted that it has filed written statement and reply to the notice of motion. Thus, prayed for dismissal of the chamber summons. 4. Heard both the parties. The plaintiff and defendant have filed written notes of arguments. The defendant argued on merit of suit in its written notes of arguments. It is settled principle that while dealing with the amendment application, the merits of the suit cannot be looked into. Record reflects that the trial is yet to began in this suit and the amendment sought by the plaintiff is consequential in nature as he has sought declaration in respect of forfeiture of the bank guarantee. As per the affidavit of the plaintiff the defendant has revoked the bank Page 2 of 3 -- 2 of 4 -- C/S. No.2342/19 (SC No.2022/19) guarantee and now during the pendancy of the suit, it is become necessary for him to bring the subsequent events. Prima facie the contentions of the plaintiff are in view of the subsequent events. In my opinion, the proposed amendment would not change the nature of the suit claim. Incorporation of facts by way of proposed amendment is necessary for deciding the real controversy between the parties. I am on the application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. At this stage, I am not allowed to touch the merits of the suit. Appreciating the relevant considerations of law with the nature of proposed amendment, the same is necessary for adjudication of the dispute on merit and same deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. Hence following order:- ORDER 1. Chamber summons No.2342/2019 in Suit No.2022/2019 is allowed as prayed. 2. Plaintiff to carry out necessary amendment on or before next date 3. Parties to take note. 4. Proceeding of chamber summons No.2342/2019 in Suit No.2022/2019 is closed. Date : 04/01/2025. (Prashant C. Kale ) Ad-hoc Judge City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Page 3 of 3 -- 3 of 4 -- C/S. No.2342/19 (SC No.2022/19) Dictated on : 04.01.2025 Typed on : 04.01.2025 Checked on : 04.01.2025 Re-typed on : 06.01.2025 Signed on : 06.01.2025 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 07.01.2025 at 5.20 pm ( Samruddhi Jadhav) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Shri. Prashant C. Kale (C.R.No.65) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 04/01/2025 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 06/01/2025 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 07/01/2025 Page 4 of 3 -- 4 of 4 --
