Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 17 Jan 2020 · CNR MHCC010135732019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4967 OF 2019 IN S.C.SUIT NO.2091 OF 2019 Syndicate Bank ... Plaintiff V/s M/s.KTN Tours and Travesl through its Proprietor, Shri.Veerappan Devendra ... Defendant APPEARANCE: Advocate Rajan Pillai for plaintiff. Advocate Vipul Shukla for defendant. CORAM : H. H. ADHOC JUDGE SHRI MILIND A. BHOSALE (COURT ROOM NO. 32) DATE : 17th January, 2020 ORDER Perused Notice of Motion @ Affidavit in Reply. Heard Ld. Counsel for plaintiff and defendant. It is submitted by the defendant that the present suit was filed by plaintiff against him for recovery of amount of Rs.2,57,192.36/. It is further submitted that the writ of summons is executed to the defendant on 18.11.2019 and thereafter, time to file written statement on record was expired on 17.11.2019. It is further submitted by the defendant that there is a delay of 23 days, defendant raised the ground that after service of writ of summons he made inquiry for necessary papers in respect of subject transaction and it took time to find out said papers and thereafter, he approached his advocate and give instructions to prepare written statement and therefore, delay has been caused. It is further submitted that delay is not intentional and deliberate. -- 1 of 3 -- 2 Defendant have good case if his right to contest the suit is deprived then he sustained irreparable loss. Lastly, it is prayed that delay of 23 days for filing written statement may kindly be condoned and defendant may be permitted to file written statement. Plaintiff opposed application by filing written reply and strongly objected notice of motion of the defendant. I have heard Ld Counsel for defendant. Perused record. The present suit filed by plaintiff against defendant for recovery of amount and accordingly writ of summons was served upon defendant on 18.10.2019. As per O.VIII R.1 of CPC defendant shall file written statement within 30 days provided that if defendant failed to tender written statement within 30 days time can be extended upto 90 days. Admittedly, defendant failed to tender written statement within stipulated time as contemplated under O.VIII R.1 of C.P.C. However, defendant raised ground that after execution of summons he made inquiry for necessary papers in respect of dispute in between plaintiff and defendant and he took time to find out said papers and 23 days delay has been caused to file written statement. According to my opinion the delay to file written statement was not long and huge present suit filed by plaintiff in the year 2019 and only 23 days delay has been caused and defendant properly explained the delay. Therefore, I come to conclusion that opportunity be given to the defendant to contest the suit and if permission is granted to the defendant to file written statement. No prejudice would be cause to the case of plaintiff. Moreover, it is useful to court also to deciding the suit on merit. Considering the above said reason I proceed to pass following -- 2 of 3 -- 3 order ORDER Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Date:17/01/2020 (Milind A.Bhosale) AdHoc Judge City Civil & Sessions Court, Gr.Bombay Dictated on : 17/01/2020 Typed on : 17/01/2020 H.H.J.Signed on : 17/01/2020 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 17.01.2020 at 4.35 p.m. (Mrs.P.P.Khanvilkar) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room no.) SHRI M.A.BHOSALE (C.R. NO.32) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ ORDER 17.01.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 17.01.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 17.01.2020 -- 3 of 3 --
