Skip to main content
SUMMARY CIVIL SUIT - SUMMARY SUIT

Union Bank of India (Corporation Bank)VsSantosh Pandurang Shrikhande

CNR MHCC01013496201961-COURT 61 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 01st October 2022

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100215/2021
Registration Date
20 Feb 2021

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Union Bank of India (Corporation Bank)

    Respondent

    1. 1Santosh Pandurang Shrikhande

    Acts & Sections

    1
    CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec 37 rule 2

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 17-04-2021
Business: In view of Office Order No. 73/21, all Courts shall remain closed on every Saturday. 17.04.2021 is Saturday, hence,  adjd to 31.07.2021.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 31-07-2021

Date: 31-07-2021
Business: Both the parties and their advocates are absent.
Due to Covid-19 pandemic.
Matter is adjd to 05.10.2021 for report.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2021

Date: 05-10-2021
Business: Court is vacant
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 08-12-2021

Date: 08-12-2021
Business: Adv B.N. Joshi for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Adv for plaintiff filed application for time extension for serving writ of summons upon the defendant. O- Extension granted accordingly.
Matter is adjd to 03.01.2022 for  report.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 03-01-2022

Date: 03-01-2022
Business: None present.
Matter is adjd for  report to 01.03.2022
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 01-03-2022

Date: 01-03-2022
Business: P.O. is on training.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 13-06-2022

Date: 13-06-2022
Business: Adv. Ms. Archana Bhor for Plaintiff present and filed an application for extension of time to serve the Writ of Summons.  t.o.r. and marked as Exhibit-3.
As the matter is pending awaiting as service report since 2020, time extended for service by 4 weeks as a last chance.
Matter adjourned to 11/07/2022 for Report.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 11-07-2022

Date: 11-07-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Upadhyay for Plaintiff present.
Plaintiff has yet not served the Defendant.  Plaintiff to take proper steps.
Matter adjourned to 01/10/2022 for Taking Steps.
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2022

Date: 01-10-2022
Business: Adv.Upadhayay for plaintiff present and filed application for extension of time to serve writ of summons.  On perusal on record it appears that the similar application are filed on 08/12/2021 as well as on 13/06/2022.  It appears that plaintiff is not taking effective steps and merely filing application for extension of time.  Nothing is explained as to what happened with the earlier writ of summons and why it could not be served.  Thus, the filing of present application is nothing but delaying tactice.  Hence, the application is rejected.  Resultantly suit stands dismissed for not want of due prosecution.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 01-10-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 114283/2019
Filing Date: 21-12-2019
First Hearing Date: 17th April 2021
Decision Date: 01st October 2022
Court Number And Judge: 61-COURT 61 ADDL  SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    01 Oct 2022
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Back
Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 61 ASST SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :SUMMARY CIVIL SUIT/0100215/2021
Union Bank of India (Corporation Bank) Vs Santosh Pandurang Shrikhande
Date : 01102022
Business : Adv.Upadhayay for plaintiff present and filed
application for extension of time to serve writ of
summons. On perusal on record it appears that the
similar application are filed on 08/12/2021 as well
as on 13/06/2022. It appears that plaintiff is not
taking effective steps and merely filing application
for extension of time. Nothing is explained as to
what happened with the earlier writ of summons
and why it could not be served. Thus, the filing of
present application is nothing but delaying tactice.
Hence, the application is rejected. Resultantly suit
stands dismissed for not want of due prosecution.
Nature of Disposal : DISMISSED
Disposal Date : 01102022
COURT 61 ASST SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.