NOTICE OF MOTION
Mr. Ashok Saibu GadgeVsMrs. Jayashree Ravindra Ahiwale
CNR MHCC01013417201828-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 06th February 2019
TrustJury record updated 15 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 103996/2018
- Registration Date
- 23 Oct 2018
Advocates
2For Petitioner
For Respondent
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 24-10-2018
Business: Adv. B. S. Patil for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Wagh for Defendant.
Advocate for defendant has filed registered Notice of Motion no.3996/18 alongwith affidavit, TOR.
Matter is adjd. to 28/11/2018 for Reply.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2018
Date: 28-11-2018
Business: Adv. for Plaintiff absent.
Adv. Prakash Wagh for Defendant present.
Matter is adjd. to 10/12/2018 for Reply on N/M.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2018
Date: 10-12-2018
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 11-01-2019
Date: 11-01-2019
Business: Adv. B. S. Patil for Plaintiff present.
None for Defendant.
Advocate for plaintiff has submitted that defendant has not served the copy of N/M no.3996/18 therefore, he is unable to file the reply. The defendant is directed to serve the copy upon the plaintiff as last chance.
Matter is adjd. to 06/02/2019 for N/M reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2019
Date: 06-02-2019
Business: Adv. B. S. Patil for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Tanya Sonarkar for Defendant present.
Order below N/M no.3996/18
Read the Notice of Motion no.3996/18 and say given by the advocate for plaintiff. Heard. It appears that there is 60days delay in filing the vakalatnama by the advocate for defendant, from the date of service of writ of summons. The plaintiff has given the say to allow the Notice of Motion subject to heavy cost, without going in to the details, it appears that the delay cause is not intentional and malafide. Hence it is just and desirable to allow the Notice of Motion. In the result, Notice of Motion no.3996/18 is allowed subject to cost of Rs.2500/- payable by the defendant to the plaintiff, on or before the next date, without fail.
The delay cause in filing the vakalatnama by the advocate for defendant in the aforesaid suit is condoned. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly.
Matter is adjd. to 08/03/2019 for Compliance.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 06-02-2019Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 114338/2018 Filing Date: 23-10-2018 First Hearing Date: 24th October 2018 Decision Date: 06th February 2019 Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
2Final Order 106 Feb 2019
06 Feb 2019
Order Details: Notice of Motion
Order 106 Feb 2019
06 Feb 2019
Order Details: Notice of Motion
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
