Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Smt. Vandana Ganpat PawarVsMCGM +1 more

CNR MHCC01013413201911-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100447/2020
Registration Date
05 Feb 2020
Next Hearing Date
28 Oct 2026
Case Stage
ORDER

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Petitioner

    1. 1Smt. Vandana Ganpat Pawar

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM
    2. 2Asst. Municipal Commissioner

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34 · 37

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 04-03-2020
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2020

Date: 17-06-2020

Date: 04-09-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 02-11-2020

Date: 02-11-2020

Date: 12-01-2021

Date: 23-02-2021

Date: 26-04-2021

Date: 03-08-2021

Date: 30-09-2021

Date: 23-11-2021

Date: 11-01-2022

Date: 24-02-2022

Date: 19-04-2022

Date: 30-06-2022

Date: 25-08-2022

Date: 15-10-2022

Date: 08-12-2022

Date: 09-02-2023

Date: 02-03-2023

Date: 29-04-2023

Date: 06-07-2023

Date: 05-09-2023

Date: 20-10-2023

Date: 19-12-2023

Date: 15-02-2024

Date: 16-04-2024

Date: 05-07-2024

Date: 20-08-2024
Business: Adv. Mrs. Luman h/f Adv. Mr. Pratap Singh for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mrs. S.R. Charatkar for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file written submissions on NM. Granted.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM by defendant to 03.10.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2024

Date: 03-10-2024
Business: Adv. Mrs. Luman h/f Adv. Mr. Pratap Singh for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mrs. S.R. Charatkar for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to argue the NM. Time is granted.
Adjourned for NM hearing by defendant to 19.11.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 19-11-2024

Date: 19-11-2024
Business: None present for the plaintiff. Adv. Mrs. S.R. Charatkar a/w Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to argue the NM. Time is granted.
Adjourned for NM hearing by defendant to 14.01.2025.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2025

Date: 14-01-2025
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2025

Date: 04-03-2025
Business: Adv. Mrs. Luman h/f Adv. Mr. Pratap Singh for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mrs. Sheetal Metakari a/w Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav h/f Adv. Mr. Botlawar for defendant/BMC is present. plaintiff has filed Written submissions on 16.04.2025 and then repeatedly adjourned for written submissions by BMC. But today it failed to file written submissions. Today advocate for BMC sought adjournment for hearing his request is discarded and NM is posted for Order.
Adjourned for NM Order to 01.04.2025.
Later on  advocate for defendant/BMC submitted that his NM reply be treated as written submissions on NM.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2025

Date: 01-04-2025
Business: None present for the plaintiff. Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/ BMC is present. The Court is busy in dictating Judgment targeted SU No. 4721/2012.
Adjourned for NM Order to 29.04.2025.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 29-04-2025

Date: 29-04-2025
Business: Adv. Mr. Pratap Singh for the plaintiff is present and submitted that he want to make oral submissions on merits in NM. The matter is today listed for NM Order. The record shows that plaintiff has filed written notes of argument on 16.04.2024 and thereafter matter adjourned for written submission/argument by defendant/BMC. On 04.03.2025 advocate for defendant/BMC submitted that reply be trated as written submissions on NM. Hence, matter adjourned to 01.04.2025 for Order in NM but Court was busy in dictating Judgment in Targeted SU No. 4721/2012. Hence, matter adjourned today for Order. In such circumstance, request of the advocate for plaintiff for re-hearing of argument is discarded. Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present. Kept back.
Later on 5. 38 p.m. None present for the plaintiff. Rest appearance is as above.  F.R.S.R. Following Order is passed in NM No. 865/2023. ORDER (i). Notice of Motion No. 865/2023 stands dismissed. (ii). Notice of Motion No. 865/2023 is, accordingly, disposed of. Adjourned for draft issues to 03.07.2025.
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 03-07-2025

Date: 03-07-2025
Business: None present for the plaintiff to proceed with matter. Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present.
Adjourned for draft issues to 20.09.2025.
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2025

Date: 20-09-2025
Business: court is on leave, hence adjd. to
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2025

Date: 25-11-2025
Business: None present for the plaintiff.
Adv. Mr. Santosh Yadav for defendant/BMC is present.
Issues are framed (Exh-4)
Adjourned for Recording Evidence of plaintiff to 10/02/2026.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 10-02-2026

Date: 10-02-2026
Business: None present for the plaintiff to proceed with matter. Adv. Mrs. Sheetal Metakari for defendant/BMC is present.
Adjourned for filing documents/RE to 09.04.2026.
Next Purpose: FILING  AFFIDAVIT OF DOCUMENT
Next Hearing Date: 09-04-2026

Date: 09-04-2026
Business: None present for the plaintiff to proceed with matter. Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present.
Adjourned for filing documents by plaintiff to 25.06.2026.
Next Purpose: FILING  AFFIDAVIT OF DOCUMENT
Next Hearing Date: 25-06-2026

Date: 25-06-2026
Business: Court is vacant.
Next Purpose: FILING  AFFIDAVIT OF DOCUMENT
Next Hearing Date: 01-09-2026

Date: 01-09-2026
Business: None present for the plaintiff to file documents and evidence. Hence, suit is posted for passing no evidence and document order. Adv. Mr. Santosh Yadav a/w Adv. Ms. Janhavi Mistry for defendant/ BMC is present.
Adjourned for passing no evidence/document order to 28.10.2026.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 28-10-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 114224/2019
Filing Date: 20-12-2019
First Hearing Date: 04th March 2020
Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1
    25 Nov 2025
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Exhibit –4
IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI
L. C. SUIT NO. 447 OF 2020
Smt. Vandana Ganpat Pawar and Anr., …. PLAINTIFF.
V/s.
MCGM and Anr. …. DEFENDANTS.
ISSUES
1. Whether the plaintiff proves that suit premises is
situated on slum land ?
2. Whether the plaintiff proves that he is eligible and
entitled for permanent alternate accommodation in
lieu of suit premises ?
3. Whether suit is bad for want of proper description of
the suit premises, in view of order VII rule 3 of
C.P.C. ?
4. Whether the suit is bad for want of notice under
section 527 of MMC Act?
5. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief of
declaration as sought ?
6. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief of perpetual
injunction as sought ?
7. What order and decree ?
(V.R. Jagdale)
Mumbai. Judge,
Dated : 25.11.2025. City Civil Court, Mumbai.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    25 Nov 2025
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Exhibit –4
IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI
L. C. SUIT NO. 447 OF 2020
Smt. Vandana Ganpat Pawar and Anr., …. PLAINTIFF.
V/s.
MCGM and Anr. …. DEFENDANTS.
ISSUES
1. Whether the plaintiff proves that suit premises is
situated on slum land ?
2. Whether the plaintiff proves that he is eligible and
entitled for permanent alternate accommodation in
lieu of suit premises ?
3. Whether suit is bad for want of proper description of
the suit premises, in view of order VII rule 3 of
C.P.C. ?
4. Whether the suit is bad for want of notice under
section 527 of MMC Act?
5. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief of
declaration as sought ?
6. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief of perpetual
injunction as sought ?
7. What order and decree ?
(V.R. Jagdale)
Mumbai. Judge,
Dated : 25.11.2025. City Civil Court, Mumbai.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.