Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Mr. Chandrashekhar Rajwant SinghVsMCGM

CNR MHCC0101335320196-COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 20th December 2019

TrustJury record updated 24 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103399/2019
Registration Date
20 Dec 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34 and 38

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 20-12-2019
    Business: By precipe
    Advocate Mr. Suraj Kudalkar for plaintiff is present and filed draft NM.
    Advocate Mr. Sutar for defendant/BMC is present.
    Officer Mr. Naman Karaniya, Asst. Engineer, B and F, G/N Ward present.
    The Ld. Advocate on behalf of the plaintiff has submitted that the defendant corporation yet has not passed any speaking order. The defendant corporation likely to pass speaking order very soon. Yet the plaintiff is not collected concerned documents in respect of the suit premises, it requires time to the plaintiff to collect entire documents in respect of the suit premises. Therefore, it be directed to the defendant corporation to not take any coercive action against the plaintiff in respect of the suit premises after one weeks after passing the speaking order.  The plaintiff is ready to withdraw the suit if the defendant corporation after considering documents which will produced by the plaintiff pass the speaking order. Officer Mr. Naman Karaniya, Asst. Engineer, B and F, G/N Ward has submitted that the defendant corporation will not take any action against the plaintiff in respect of the suit premises till passing the speaking order.
    In view of submission of both the parties I think it is proper to direct to the defendant corporation. It is hereby directed to the defendant corporation to pass the speaking order after considering reply and documents produced by the plaintiff. Till one weeks after passing the speaking order the defendant corporation shall not take any action against the plaintiff in respect of the suit premises in pursuant of notice issued by the defendant corporation u/s. 354A of MMC Act dated 13.12.2019. The plaintiff shall produce documents whatever he likes to the defendant corporation on or before 01.01.2020. The plaintiff shall not commence any construction till passing further order. Hence, this suit is hereby disposed off. Draft NM is also disposed off accordingly. NM be registered for statistical purpose.
    Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
    Disposal Date: 20-12-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 114163/2019
    Filing Date: 19-12-2019
    First Hearing Date: 20th December 2019
    Decision Date: 20th December 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 6-COURT 06  ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    20 Dec 2019

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: : 1 1. Dt:20.12.2019 NM 49382019 By precipe Advocate Mr. Suraj Kudalkar for plaintiff is present and filed draft NM. Advocate Mr. Sutar for defendant/BMC is present. Officer Mr. Naman Karaniya, Asst. Engineer, B&F, G/N Ward present. The Ld. Advocate on behalf of the plaintiff has submitted that the defendant corporation yet has not passed any speaking order. The defendant corporation likely to pass speaking order very soon. Yet the plaintiff is not collected concerned…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.