Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Cynthia Stephen D-silva and Anr.VsRodney Medard D-silva and Anr.

CNR MHCC0101325820192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 30th January 2020

TrustJury record updated 24 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102285/2019
Registration Date
18 Dec 2019

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 08-01-2020
    Business: Adv. Kritika Kothari for plaintiff present.
    She tendered registered Chamber summons 2285/19 t.o.r.
    KB
    LO
    Adjourned for reply to 30.01.2020
    Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
    Next Hearing Date: 30-01-2020
    
    Date: 30-01-2020
    Business: Adv. Rahul Raut for plaintiffs present.
    Adv. Irani along with Adv. Tikare for defendants present.
    Say filed by advocate for defendant on chamber summons itself.
    KB
    LO
    Order passed below Chamber Summons No.2285 of 2019
            Perused chamber summons, affidavit in support of it and say filed by defendants.  Heard respective counsel for parties.
         Chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiffs to incorporate valuation clause as per schedule annexed to chamber summons.
                It is the contention of plaintiffs that Registrar (Civil) was directed to conduct investigation under section 9 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act to ascertain correct valuation of suit as on date of institution of suit and submit report within two weeks of receipt of order.  Registrar submitted his report and assessed the valuation pertaining to suit property at Rs.62,29,583/- and ascertained court fee.  As per order dated 13.11.2019, said report has been accepted and plaintiffs were directed to take the steps to amend the valuation clause in the plaint and to pay deficit court fee in terms of said report. In view of above contentions plaintiffs have prayed to allow present chamber summons.
            Defendants objected to present chamber summons on the count that chamber summons is taken out to fill the lacuna and cannot be allowed in view of proviso to order VI Rule 17 of the CPC as no sufficient cause is shown.
            It is pertinent to note that as per order dated 13.11.2019 passed by this Court, report of Registrar (Civil) submitted in pursuance of order dated 09.08.2019 of this Court was accepted and plaintiffs were directed to take steps to amend the valuation clause in the plaint and to pay deficiet court fee as per said report.  In view of said direction of the court present chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiffs making contention about the correct valuation of the suit claim.  In view of above facts of matter the objections taken by the defendants have no merits.  Therefore, I am inclined to allow present chamber summons with direction to  the plaintiffs to pay deficit court fee.  Hence, pass following order
    ORDER
    1.     Chamber Summons No.2285 of 2019 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
    2.    Plaintiffs have to carry out amendment as per schedule annexed to chamber summons within period of two weeks from the date of this order and they are also permitted to pay deficit court fee of Rs.83,700/- (Rupees Eighty Three Thousand and Seven Hundred only) within period of two weeks from the date of this order.
    3. Accordingly, chamber summons stands disposed off.
    Adjourned for compilation to 10.02.2020
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 30-01-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 114041/2019
    Filing Date: 18-12-2019
    First Hearing Date: 08th January 2020
    Decision Date: 30th January 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    30 Jan 2020

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 30.01.2020 SU 3825/08 CS 2285/19 CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02) Adv. Rahul Raut for plaintiffs present. Adv. Irani along with Adv. Tikare for defendants present. Say filed by advocate for defendant on chamber summons itself. KB LO Order passed below Chamber Summons No.2285 of 2019 Perused chamber summons, affidavit in support of it and say filed by defendants. Heard respective counsel for parties. Chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiffs to…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.