Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 08 Oct 2025 · CNR MHCC010132342019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010132342019 Presented on 17/12/2019 Registered on 12/03/2021 Decided on 08/10/2025 Duration 05Y: 09M: 22D Exhibit 22 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MAZGAON, MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 298 OF 2021 UBI ( e-Corpn) ] Corporation Bank ] A body corporate constituted by and under ] the provisions of the the Banking Companies ] (Acquisitions & Transfer of Undertaking) ] Act, 1980 having its head office at Mangalore ] and also at Veena Chamber 21, Dalal Street ] Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 001 ] Through the Manager, Fort Branch. ]... Plaintiff V/s. ] 1. Shri Vishal Himmat Khot ] Khot Galli, Ludewadi ] H. No. 85, Devwadi Sangli, Shirala ] Maharashtra -415408. ] 2. M/s. Premier Ltd. ] 58, Nariman Bhavan, 5th Floor, ] Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021 ] also at ] Mumbai-Pune Road, Chinchwad, ] Pune-411019. ]...Defendants Appearance:- Ld. Advocate Maya Majumdar for the plaintiff. Defendants absent (Ex-parte). -- 1 of 9 -- 2 SUM SU NO. 298/2021 CORAM : HHJ SHRI SANGRAM SHRIHARI SHINDE C. R. NO. : 81 DATE : 08/10/2025 JUDGMENT (Dictated and pronounced in open Court) 01. This is the suit filed under Rule 2 of Order XXXVII of Code of Civil procedure, 1908 (C.P.C.), by the plaintiff Bank for recovery of an amount of Rs. 2,78,355/- from defendant No.1. 02. The suit against defendant No.2 is withdrawn in view of Order II, Rule 2 of C.P.C. as per order dated 04/10/2023 passed on application at Exh. 3. Brief facts of plaintiff’s case may be summarized as under :- 03. The plaintiff bank is a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970 having its office at address mentioned in title cause. The Manager of plaintiff bank has instituted suit. Defendant No. 1 is an individual and a borrower of loan and defendant No. 2 was guarantor to said loan. Defendant No.1 had approached to the plaintiff and applied on 27/03/2014 for vehicle loan of Rs. 6,91,623/- to purchase new Premier Rio + GLX (Petrol BS IV) car. Plaintiff bank after scrutinizing the said documents advanced loan of Rs. 6,22,000/- to defendant No. 1. The plaintiff bank sanctioned said loan vide sanction letter dated 24/03/2014 at the rate of 10.65% p.a. as per terms and conditions set out therein. Defendant No. 1 executed Agreement for term loan and Agreement for Hypothecation of vehicle on 27/03/2014. Further, Guarantee Agreement was executed on 22/03/2014, letter of Undertaking/Declaration, Delivery Receipt dated 22/03/2014. The plaintiff bank opened loan account bearing No. CVEHI/01/140063 -- 2 of 9 -- 3 SUM SU NO. 298/2021 (New Account No.560761000820032) and an amount of Rs. 6,22,000/- was directly paid to defendant No.2 as per direction of defendant No. 1. 04. According to the plaintiff, the defendants had agreed terms and conditions of agreement. However, defendants failed and neglected to pay monthly installments of loan and last payment made by defendant No.1 on 30/03/2019. Therefore, loan account declared as N.P.A. w.e.f. 25/04/2019. As defendant No. 1 failed to repay said loan account, plaintiff bank issued a letter dated 01/11/2019, and called upon to pay outstanding amount of Rs. 2,78,355/- as on 28/10/2019. However, defendant No. 1 failed to repay the same. Therefore, plaintiff bank issued demand notice dated 18/11/2019 and 25/11/2019 to defendant No. 1 and to defendant No. 2 respectively and called upon to make payment of outstanding amount. The notice dated 25/11/2019 was served on 27/11/2019 by hand delivery to defendant No. 2. Defendant No.2 replied to said notice on 28/11/2019 and acknowledged and admitted liability to make full repayment. Plaintiff replied to defendant No. 2's notice on 05/12/2019 and informed notice cannot be withdrawn against defendant No.1. The defendants failed to repay outstanding amount. Therefore, plaintiff bank has filed the present suit and prayed to decree the suit accordingly. 05. The defendants were served with the writ of summons in the month of August, 2021 however, they have not caused their appearance and therefore, the suit proceeded ex-parte against them by the order dated 22/09/2022. 06. In support of claim, the plaintiff filed its affidavit of claim of Jitendra Singh Rawat, Senior Manager of plaintiff bank as P.W.1 at -- 3 of 9 -- 4 SUM SU NO. 298/2021 Exh. 5, and reiterated his contention of recovery of Rs. 2,78,355/-. The plaintiff has filed and relied upon the following documents. Plaintiff bank closed their evidence vide pursis Exh. 21. Sr. No. Exhibit No. Particulars 1 Exh. 7 Loan application 2 Exh. 8 Credit Sanction Intimation 3 Exh. 9 Original agreement for term loan. 4 Exh. 10 Original agreement for Hypothecation 5 Exh. 11 Original Letter of undertaking/declaration 6 Exh. 12 Original Delivery Receipt 7 Exh. 13 Office copy of letter 8 Exh.14 Office copy of legal notice dated 18/11/2019 9 Exh.15 Office copy of legal notice dated 25/11/2019 10 Exh.16 Verified copy of reply dated 28/11/2019 11 Exh.17 Verified copy of reply dated 05/12/2019 12 Exh.18 colly. Statement of accounts and NPA statement supported by certificate u/s. 65B of The Indian Evidence Act 13 Exh.19 Original acknowledgment of defendant. 14 Exh.20 Office copy of Auction Notice dated 30/12/2019 sent to borrower 07. To decide the present suit, following points arise for my determination to which my findings are recorded against each of them for the reasons given below :- -- 4 of 9 -- 5 SUM SU NO. 298/2021 Sr. No. Points Findings 1. Whether the plaintiff bank is entitled to recover an amount of Rs. 2,78,355/- from defendant No.1? If yes, at what rate of interest ? Yes, the plaintiff bank is entitled to interest @ 7% p.a. on Rs. 2,78,355/- from 17/12/2019, the date of filing of suit till its full realization. 2. What order and decree? As per final order. R E A S O N S AS TO POINTS NO. 1 AND 2 :- 08. Perused plaint, oral and documentary evidence on record. Heard leaned counsel for the plaintiff bank. Mr. Jitendra Rawat P.W.1, Senior Manager of plaintiff bank has reiterated contents in plaint. Further, defendant No.1 had approached plaintiff bank and made application dated 20/03/2014 for vehicle at Exh. 7 to purchase new Premier Rio + GLX (Petrol BS IV) car. Plaintiff bank sanctioned loan vide Exh. 8 on 24/03/2014. Defendant No.1 has executed Agreement for term loan dated 27/03/2014 at Exh.9, Hypothecation Agreement dated 27/03/2014 at Exh.10, Letter of Undertaking/Declaration at Exh.11 and Delivery Receipt dated 27/03/2014 at Exh.12. On perusing these documents, it appears that defendant No. 1 had applied for vehicle loan which was sanctioned and same is paid to defendant No. 2. 09. As, defendant No.1 failed to repay outstanding balance amount therefore, plaintiff bank had issued letter to defendant No.1 on 01/11/2019 at Exh.13 and called upon to repay the outstanding amount. Defendant No.1 failed to repay outstanding amount therefore, plaintiff bank issued legal notice dated 18/11/2019 at Exh. 14 and called upon to pay outstanding amount. Further, plaintiff bank has filed -- 5 of 9 -- 6 SUM SU NO. 298/2021 copy of statement of accounts at Exh.18 colly. along with NPA statement supported by certificate to show that an amount of Rs. 2,78,355/- is due against defendant No. 1 as on 28/10/2019. On perusing said statement, it appears that an amount of Rs. 2,78,355/- is balance and due against defendant No. 1. Further, on perusing record, it appears that plaintiff had issued notice dated 25/11/2019 at Exh.15 to defendant No.2 and called upon to make the payment. Defendant No.2 has replied on 28/11/2019 at Exh.16 to notice dated 25/11/2019, wherein defendant No.2 has admitted liability to pay outstanding amount of its employees. Further, defendant No.2 called upon plaintiff to withdraw notice issued to defendant No.1. Plaintiff vide reply dated 05/12/2019 at Exh.17 given to reply of defendant No.2 at Exh.16 has refused to withdraw notice issued to defendant No.1. Thus, as per oral and documentary evidence adduced by the plaintiff bank that it is proved that defendant No.1 had borrowed vehicle loan and failed to repay outstanding amount. Further, as defendant No. 1 has failed to appear and cross examine the evidence of the plaintiff bank has remained unchallenged. 10. Thus, as discussed above statement of account shows that loan amount Rs. 2,78,355/- was outstanding as on 28/10/2019. Hence, I hold that on the basis of oral and documentary evidence of plaintiff bank, it is proved that plaintiff bank is entitled to recover an amount of Rs. 2,78,355/- from defendant No. 1, as he failed to repay said amount. So far as interest on the said amount is concerned, the plaintiff bank has not claimed interest on the said amount. Plaintiff bank has sanctioned loan on 24/03/2014. Further, on perusing statement of account at Exh.18 colly., it appears that plaintiff has made last payment of installment on 30/03/2019. The suit is filed on 17/12/2019. Therefore, suit is within limitation. Thus, plaintiff has proved that it is entitled for -- 6 of 9 -- 7 SUM SU NO. 298/2021 an amount of Rs. 2,78,355/- from defendant No.1 along with interest. Hence, I answer point No. 1 in affirmative and in the result, in answer to point No. 2, I proceed to pass following order. O R D E R 1) Summary Suit No. 298 of 2021 is hereby decreed with the costs. 2) Defendant No.1 shall pay an amount of Rs. 2,78,355/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Seventy Eight Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty Five only) to the plaintiff bank within 60 days from the date of order. 3) If, defendant No. 1 fails to pay above amount within 60 days, he shall pay to the plaintiff bank simple interest on Rs. 2,78,355/- at the rate of 7% p.a from 17/12/2019, the date of filing of suit till its full realization. 4) The plaintiff bank may be entitled to get refund the court fees paid, if provided for in Rules. 5) The decree be drawn up accordingly. (Sangram S. Shinde) Adhoc Judge, City Civil Court Mazgaon, Mumbai Court Room No.81 Date: 08/10/2025 Dictated on:08/10/2025 Corrected & signed on: 13/10/2025 -- 7 of 9 -- 8 SUM SU NO. 298/2021 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 13/10/2025 Mrs. V. V. Malgaonkar Name of the Judge (with Court Room No.) Shri S. S. Shinde C.R. No.81 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ ORDER 08/10/2025 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P. O. on 13/10/2025 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 13/10/2025 -- 8 of 9 -- 9 SUM SU NO. 298/2021 -- 9 of 9 --
