Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 17 Sept 2021 · CNR MHCC010131512019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Comm.Suit No. 3/2020. 1 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.29). MHCC010131512019 Presented on : 16-12-2019 Registered on : 04-01-2020 Decided on : 17-09-2021 Duration : 1 years, 9 months, 1 days IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY. COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 3 OF 2020 Exh.29. Jaysynth Dyestuff (I). Pvt. Ltd. ) A Company incorporated under ) The provisions of Indian Companies Act, ) and Having its registered office at, ) 301, Sumer Kendra Pandurang Budhkar Marg, ) Worli, Mumbai400 018 ) Through Mr. Kailash G. Reshim ) the senior officerAccounts of the Company ) duly authorized by resolution passed on ) 13/02/2019 by the Board of Directors )...Plaintiff Versus Manpasand Textile Processors Pvt. Ltd. ) A Company incorporated under ) The provisions of Indian Companies Act, ) and Having its address at, ) Sector P, Plot No.3033, 5356, 72 to 75 ) Parvati Coop. Indl. Estate, ) Yadrav, Ichalkaranji Kolhapur, ) MH 416 121 IN )...Defendant SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI R.R.BHAGWAT. (C.R.NO.31). DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER, 2021. -- 1 of 6 -- Comm.Suit No. 3/2020. 2 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.29). Mr. C.D.Mishra, Advocate for the plaintiff. None for the defendant – (Exparte). JUDGMENT (EXPARTE) 1. This is suit for recovery of money. 2. Case of the plaintiff, in brief, is as under : The plaintiff as well as the defendant are the companies duly incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act. The plaintiff had supplied goods to the defendant from time to time in accordance with the purchase orders placed by the defendant. Delivery of goods was made. The plaintiff has specifically referred five invoices in para 2 of the plaint showing total outstanding amount of Rs.5,48,611/. The defendant acknowledged and confirmed the delivery of goods and he never raised any dispute regarding rate, quality and quantity of the goods. The defendant had agreed to pay within 60 days on receipt of the goods and on default to pay interest at the rate of 16% from the respective due dates of invoices. The plaintiff has clarified the aspect of part payment made by the defendant in para 5 of the plaint and claimed that amount of Rs.3,79,967/ is outstanding. He has relied upon confirmation statement for the period from 01/04/2016 to 31/06/2017 issued by the defendant. As the defendant failed to make payment, the plaintiff issued demand notice through his advocate on 29/11/2018 making demand of Rs.4,79,967/ including accrued interest. After receipt of the notice, the defendant made part payment of Rs.1,00,000/ on 28/06/2019 and he failed to make payment of remaining amount. Hence, the plaintiff sought relief of recovery of Rs.5,38,017/ with further interest at the rate of 16% p.a. on principal amount of Rs.3,79,967/ from the date of suit till its -- 2 of 6 -- Comm.Suit No. 3/2020. 3 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.29). realization with cost. 3. The defendant is duly served with writ of summons as per affidavit of service (Exh.5), but he failed to appear and oppose the claim of the plaintiff. Therefore, my learned Predecessor passed the ex parte order against him on 05/02/2021. 4. PW 1 Kailash deposed on evidence affidavit (Exh.7) and proved documents filed with list of documents (Exh.8). The plaintiff closed evidence vide pursis (Exh.28). Heard learned counsel C.D.Mishra for the plaintiff. 5. After considering pleadings of the plaintiff and evidence on record, following points arose for my determination with my findings against them with reasons to follow : SR.NO. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Does the plaintiff prove that he is entitled to recover amount of Rs.5,38,017/ ? In the Affirmative. 2. Does the plaintiff prove that he is entitled to interest on principal sum of Rs.3,79,967/ ? If yes, at what rate of interest ? In the Affirmative. @ 16% p.a. 3. What order as to costs ? As per final order. 4. What order and decree ? Suit is decreed. -- 3 of 6 -- Comm.Suit No. 3/2020. 4 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.29). REASONS AS TO POINT NOS.1 TO 3 : 6. Contents in evidence affidavit (Exh.7) filed by witness Kailash reveals that the plaintiff had supplied goods to the defendant as per five invoices (Exh.10 colly.) and the same were delivered as per four goods consignment notes (Exh.11 colly.). Statement of account (Exh.12) reveals details of the outstanding amount of Rs.3,79,967/ as on 16/12/2019. Similarly, confirmation statement for the period from 01/04/2016 to 31/03/2017 (Exh.13) is signed by both parties in which amount of Rs.5,20,777/ is shown to be outstanding. Furthermore, confirmation statement for the period from 01/04/2017 to 30/06/2017 (Exh.14) is signed by both parties in which amount of Rs.5,64,534/ is shown to be outstanding. The defendant had received the notice dated 29/11/2018 (Exh.16) as per acknowledgement (Exh.18). The defendant issued three cheques of Rs.1,00,000/ each dated 24/06/2019, 24/07/2019 and 28/07/2019 (Exh.19, 20 and 21 respectively). He had also issued the cheque of Rs.50,154/ dated 30/07/2019 (Exh.22). All these cheques were dishonoured as per six dishonour memos (Exh.23 colly.). Then, advocate for the plaintiff issued notice dated 26/11/2019 (Exh.24) as per Section 138 of the N.I.Act. 7. Oral and documentary evidence on record reveals that the defendant has not disputed the liability. He continued to make part payment of outstanding amount. Confirmation statements (Exh.13 and 14) fortifies to the case of the plaintiff. In addition to it, cheques issued by the defendant in June and July 2019, shows that he was burdened with liability to pay the amount shown in the cheques. Invoices as well as goods consignment notes prove the basic fact of supply of goods to -- 4 of 6 -- Comm.Suit No. 3/2020. 5 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.29). the defendant by the plaintiff. For all these reasons, unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff is liable to be accepted. Claim of the plaintiff regarding interest at the rate of 16% p.a. is reasonable considering nature of transaction and delay caused in making payment of outstanding amount. For all above discussion, the suit is liable to be decreed with costs. Accordingly, I record my findings as to Point No.1 and 2 in the affirmative. Hence, I pass the following order : ORDER 1. Commercial Suit No. 3/2020 is decreed. 2. The defendant is directed to pay amount of Rs.5,38,017/ (Rupees Five Lakhs Thirtyeight Thousand Seventeen Only) to the plaintiff within three months from the date of decree. 3. The defendant is further directed to pay interest @ 16% p.a. on the principal amount of Rs.3,79,967/ to the plaintiff from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. 4. The defendant shall bear the costs of the suit. 5. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (R.R.BHAGWAT) Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, (Court Room No.31) Date : 17/09/2021. Mumbai. 1. Dictated online on : 17/09/2021. 2. Signed on : 17/09/2021. 3. Delivered to Certified : Copy Section on “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL -- 5 of 6 -- Comm.Suit No. 3/2020. 6 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.29). SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 17/09/2021. 4.30 p.m. Miss M.A.Kulkarni. Name of the Judge (with Court Room no.) HHJ Shri R.R.Bhagwat. (Court Room No.31). Date of Pronouncement of Judgment/Order 17/09/2021. Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 17/09/2021. Judgment/Order uploaded on 17/09/2021. -- 6 of 6 --
