Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Mr. Ramlingam PadiyachiVsMr. Basir Ahmed +1 more

CNR MHCC01012926201962-COURT 62 AD-HOC ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 23rd November 2021

TrustJury record updated 24 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100278/2020
Registration Date
23 Jan 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mr. Ramlingam Padiyachi

    Respondent

    1. 1Mr. Basir Ahmed
    2. 2Mohammed Sansar Nisar Ahmed Khan

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 13-02-2020
Business: Adv. Mehboobi for Plaintiff present .
None present for Defendant.
As Court is busy in dictating Judgment in Suit No. 3677/11, board is discharged.
Case is adjourned to 23/4/2020 for directions.
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2020

Date: 23-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 14-05-2020

Date: 14-05-2020
Business: Due to Covid 19 pandemic, matters are adjourned as per Office order no.77.2020
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 03-06-2020

Date: 03-06-2020
Business: Case is adjd.to 20.06.20 in view of extension of Lockdown period as per office order no.83/20 dtd.01.06.20
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2020

Date: 20-06-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 18-08-2020

Date: 18-08-2020
Business: Due to Covid 19
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 21-10-2020

Date: 21-10-2020
Business: None present for Plaintiffs.
None present for Defendants.
Due to Corona pandemic, it seems that parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 22/01/2021.
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 22-01-2021

Date: 22-01-2021
Business: None present for plaintiff. Plaintiff to serve writ of summons on the defendants.
As nobody present for the plaintiff, considering present
pandemic condition matter is adjd. for service of writ of
summons to 27.04.2021.
Judge
L.O.
Adv Mr. Riyaz Ahmed for plaintiff present and seeks extended time to serve the defendants with writ of summons. Time extended till next date.
Already adjd. to 27.04.2021.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 27-04-2021

Date: 27-04-2021
Business: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 03-07-2021

Date: 03-07-2021
Business: As per circular No.106 dt.14.06.2021 holiday declared on 03.07.2021 hence matter adjourned to 05.07.2021.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 05-07-2021

Date: 05-07-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 01-09-2021

Date: 01-09-2021
Business: None present for plff.
Plff has not filed affidavit of service of writ of summons hence, matter is adjd. for dismissal order to 23.11.2021.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 23-11-2021

Date: 23-11-2021
Business: None present for both the parties.
K.B.
L.O. at 1.05 p.m.
Plaintiff has not filled affidavit of service of writ of summons. Nobody appeared for the plaintiff despite keeping back the matter.
There is no propriety to keep the matter pending any further in absence of plaintiff hence, suit is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
Proceeding is closed.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 23-11-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 113694/2019
Filing Date: 09-12-2019
First Hearing Date: 13th February 2020
Decision Date: 23rd November 2021
Court Number And Judge: 62-COURT 62 AD-HOC  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    23 Nov 2021
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 23/11/2021 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI P.P.RAJVAIDYA (C.R. NO.62)
4
SU 278/20
None present for both the parties.
K.B.
L.O. at 1.05 p.m.
Plaintiff has not filled affidavit of service of writ of summons.
Nobody appeared for the plaintiff despite keeping back the
matter.
There is no propriety to keep the matter pending any further
in absence of plaintiff hence, suit is dismissed in default for
want of prosecution.
Proceeding is closed.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.