Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01012718201913 Jun 2022
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 13 Jun 2022 · CNR MHCC010127182019

Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement
Pdf Text: MHCC010127182019
Presented on 05-12-2019
Registered on 16-12-2019
Decided on 13-06-2022
Duration Years Months Days
02 06 08
CNR No. MHCC010127182019
EXH.08
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY
SUMMARY SUIT NO.1273 OF 2019
YALLAPA POCHCHAPA JADHAV
Age 30 years, Indian Inhabitant, carrying on
business at Room No.78, Makadwala Chawl,
Jay Shankar Chowk, Masarani Lane, Halav
Pul, Kurla (W), Mumbai – 400 070. ...Plaintiff.
V/s.
SURESH YALLAPPA KANLE,
adult, working for gain with B.M.C. Office,
Garage Building, Desgn: Driver. Dept. Consy;
P.C. No.5087, E.C.No.3970355, Pant Nagar,
Ghatkopar (E), Mumbai 400075.
and residing at Bhim Shakti Chawl Commitee,
Mukund Nagar, Nagewadi, P. L. Lokhande
Marg, Chembur, Mumbai – 400 089. ....Defendant.
Appearances:
Ld. Adv Mr. Rajesh Patil for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
-- 1 of 5 --
Summary Suit 1273 of 2019 .. J/2 .. Ex-parte Judgment
CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE
SMT. R.K. KSHIRSAGAR
(C.R.No.13)
DATED : 13th June, 2022.
J U D G M E N T
(Exparte)
1. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff for recovery of an
amount of Rs.2,88,852/(Rupees Two Lacs Eighty Eight Thousand Eight
Hundred and Fifty Two only) with further interest on the principal
amount of Rs.1,90,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Ninety Thousand only) at
the rate of 18% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its
realization.
2. The facts in brief are as follows :
The plaintiff lent and advanced to the defendant the sum of
Rs.1,90,000/ on 10.01.2017 in cash with interest at the rate of 18%
per annum. The defendant executed demand promisory note in favour
of plaintiff. The defendant failed to repay the same. The plaintiff on
several occasions demanded the repayment of said amount, but the
defendant failed and neglected to pay the same. The plaintiff issued
legal notices but the defendant failed to repay the demand. Hence, the
present suit. The plaintiff prayed to decree the suit.
3. The defendant was duly served but, he failed to appear
hence, suit was proceeded Exparte against the defendant as per order
dated 18.12.2021.
4. Heard the Learned Advocate for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed
Claim Affidavit Exh.3 alongwith Compilation of Documents vide Exh.04.
-- 2 of 5 --
Summary Suit 1273 of 2019 .. J/3 .. Ex-parte Judgment
Plaintiff filed the original promisory note and Notice of demand vide
Exh.5 and 6.
6. After going through the documents filed by the plaintiff, it
seems that the defendant had taken the amount and agreed to repay the
same on demand alongwith interest. The defendant however, failed to
repay the same. The original promissory note shows that the promissory
note was executed by the defendant. The defendant failed to appear
and challenge the oral and documentary evidence of plaintiff. The
defendant also failed to crossexamine the plaintiff. Therefore, the
evidence of plaintiff has gone unchallenged. The plaintiff on oath
stated about the money lent to the defendant. The documents filed by
the plaintiff had also gone unchallenged. It therefore seems that the
defendant is liable to pay the principal amount and the interest accrued
upon it. The plaintiff calculated the amount of Rs.2,88,852/ till the
date of filing of the suit. Considering the nature of transaction it would
not be appropriate to grant further interest at the rate of 18% per
annum. However, the interest at the rate of 9% per annum would meet
the ends of Justice. Hence, I, proceed to pass the following order:
ORDER
1. The Summary Suit no. 1273 of 2019 is decreed with costs.
2. The defendant shall pay the sum of Rs.2,88,852/(Rupees Two
Lacs Eighty Eight Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty Two only)
to the plaintiff with interest on the principal amount of
Rs. 1,90,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Ninety Thousand only) at the
rate of 9 percent p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till its
realisation.
3. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
-- 3 of 5 --
Summary Suit 1273 of 2019 .. J/4 .. Ex-parte Judgment
4. Court fee be refunded to the plaintiff if any as per rules.
5. Judgement dictated and pronounced in open court.
R and P be sent to Record Department.
( Smt. R. K. Kshirsagar )
Judge, (C.R.No.13)
Dt.: 13062022 City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI
Direct Typed on : 13062022
checked on : 13062022
Signed on : 13062022
( Smt. R. K. Kshirsagar )
Judge, (C.R.No.13)
City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI
-- 4 of 5 --
Summary Suit 1273 of 2019 .. J/5 .. Ex-parte Judgment
“CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER”
17.06.2022 at 05.10 p.m.
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (YATISH R. JAGDALE)
NAME OF TYPIST
Name of the Judge H.H.J.Smt.R.K.Kshirsagar
(COURT ROOM NO.13)
Date of pronouncement of
judgment/order 13.06.2022
Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 13.06.2022
Judgment/order uploaded on 17.06.2022
-- 5 of 5 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.