Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 20 Feb 2021 · CNR MHCC010127142019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: 1 Sum.Suit No.1269/19 MHCC010127142019 Presented on : 05-12-2019 Registered on : 16-12-2019 Decided on : 20-02-2021 Duration :1 Yrs.2 Mths.15 Ds IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1269 of 2019 (UNDER ORDER XXXVII THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908) Gangaram Janu Pawar Age: 40 years, Indian Inhabitant carrying on business at Room No. 23/235, Balchand Shindhi Chawl, Jayshankar Chowk, Halav Pul Road, Kurla West, Mumbai 400070. ...Plaintiff VERSUS Syed Ahmed Ibarat Khan adult working for gain with BMC Office, Garage Building, Desgn: JCB Operator, E.C. No. 3583997, Pant Nagar, Ghatkopar (E), Mumbai 400 075 and residing at Daruwala Chawl, Near Roshan High School, Near Suleman Masjid, Kurla West, Mumbai 400 070. ...Defendant Appearances:- Advocate Shri. Rajesh M. Patil for the plaintiff Ex-parte against the Defendant. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE DEEPAK L. BHAGWAT (C.R.NO.28) DATE : 20th February, 2021 -- 1 of 5 -- 2 Sum.Suit No.1269/19 J U D G M E N T 1. This is Summary Suit for recovery of amount of Rs.2,99,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Ninety Nine Thousand Only) with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 18% p.a.. 2. According to the plaintiff, in consideration of Rs.2,50,000/- obtained by the defendant from the plaintiff, the defendant executed promissory note of same amount on 14.09.2018 in favour of the plaintiff. By same promissory note the defendant promised to pay the amount of Rs.2,50,000/- with interest at the rate of 18% p.a.. However, the defendant neglected to pay the said amount. Despite service of legal notice of demand dated 10.09.2019, the defendant failed to pay the said amount. At the institution of the suit, the amount due and payable by the defendant was Rs.2,99,000/-. Therefore, the plaintiff claimed decree for recovery of said amount with the interest. 3. Despite service of summons the defendant failed to appear. Therefore, the suit proceeded ex-parte against the Defendant. 4. Considering the material on record and submissions made on behalf of the plaintiff points arise for determination along with my findings thereon for the reasons recorded are as under:- Sr.No. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of the amount as prayed ? Affirmative -- 2 of 5 -- 3 Sum.Suit No.1269/19 2. At what rate of pendente lite and future interest ? 12% p.a. 3. What order & decree? As per final order R E A S O N S AS TO POINTS NO.1 to 3 :- 5. The plaintiff filed his Claim Affidavit at Exh.7 and also produced documents with list Exh.8. The Affidavit and the document as promissory note dtd.14.09.2018 reveal that the defendant executed said promissory note for Rs.2,50,000/- in favour of the plaintiff and also promised to pay interest at the rate of 18% p.a.. Copy of license in Form No.3 shows that the plaintiff is licensed Money Lender. Despite service of legal notice dtd.10.09.2019, the defendant failed to pay the amount to the plaintiff. Thus, the Claim Affidavit, documents on record and the circumstance that defendant failed to appear and contest/challenge the suit, proved the case of the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of the amount as prayed. So far as pendente lite and future interest is concerned, considering the facts and circumstances, it is just and proper to grant the same at the rate of 12% p.a.. Hence, point No.1 is answered in the Affirmative and point No.2 is answered as 12% p.a.. In view of Para-499 of Civil Manual court fees has to be refunded to the plaintiff, this being summary suit where the defendant did not appear. In answer to point No.3 order as follows is passed:- ORDER 1. The suit is ex-parte decreed with costs as under. -- 3 of 5 -- 4 Sum.Suit No.1269/19 2. The Defendant shall pay to the plaintiff amount of Rs.2,99,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Ninety Nine Thousand Only) with simple interest at the rate of 12% p.a. on principal amount of Rs.2,50,000/- from the date of suit till realization of the amount. 3. Court fees be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (Deepak L. Bhagwat) Ad-Hoc Judge, Date: 20.02.2021 City Civil Court, Mumbai Dictated on : 20.02.2021 Transcribed on : 20.02.2021 Signed on : 23.02.2021 -- 4 of 5 -- 5 Sum.Suit No.1269/19 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE & TIME : 23.02.2021 11.00 a.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : S.S.BATHE Name of Judge (with Court Room No.) Shri.D.L.Bhagwat (C.R.NO.28) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT /ORDER 20.02.2021 JUDGMENT /ORDER signed by P.O. on 23.02.2021 JUDGMENT /ORDER uploaded on 23.02.2021 -- 5 of 5 --
