Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Prakash Tukaram Survey and Ors. - Plffs. Jayshree Narayan Bille - ApplicantVsChristopher Domnic Demello

CNR MHCC0101263120197-COURT 07 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 05th March 2021

TrustJury record updated 24 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102175/2019
Registration Date
04 Dec 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Prakash Tukaram Survey and Ors. - Plffs. Jayshree Narayan Bille - Applicant

    Respondent

    1. 1Christopher Domnic Demello

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 05-12-2019
Business: Court is busy in recording of evidence of Suit No. 7827/98.
Adv.Hina Mody for plaintiff present tendered registered C/S No.2175/19. T.O.R.
Adv.V.K.Khandare for applicant tendered vakalatnama.(Exh-21) T.O.R.
Adv.Dmello for defendant present.
Matter is adj to 27/01/2020 for C/S reply.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 27-01-2020

Date: 27-01-2020
Business: PO IS ON LEAVE(SECOND HALF)
Matter is adj to 28/02/2020 for C/S reply.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2020

Date: 28-02-2020
Business: Court is busy hearing on N/M No.4694/18
Adv.Hina Mody for plaintiff present.
Adv.V.K.Khandare for applicant present.
Adv.Dmello for defendant present
Defendant no.1 in person present.
Defendant no.1 filed reply on C/S No.2175/19 and C/S No.2171/19 T.O.R
Matter is adj to 28/03/2020 for C/S hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-03-2020

Date: 28-03-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 21-04-2020

Date: 21-04-2020
Business: NATIONAL LOCKDOWN.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 01-06-2020

Date: 01-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 18-06-2020

Date: 18-06-2020
Business: Due to Corona Pandemic, it seems that parties are absent hence case adjourned to 14.08.2020
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-08-2020

Date: 14-08-2020
Business: National lockdown
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-09-2020

Date: 28-09-2020
Business: Due to Covid-19 none present.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-11-2020

Date: 09-11-2020
Business: Due to Covid-19 none present.
Court is busy in online training.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2021

Date: 14-01-2021
Business: Plaintiff and defendant absent.
Their advocate absent.
Matter adjd for C/s hearing on 05/03/2021.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2021

Date: 05-03-2021
Business: Adv Heena Mody for plaintiff present.
Defendant and advocate absent.
Order in C/s 2175 of 2019
This c/s is taken out by the applicant i.e.  LRs of plaintiff no.10. According to applicant her husband expired on 28/08/2017. She is a illiterate lady not aware about the proceeding. Just before filing the present C/s she came to know from other plaintiff about present proceeding. Therefore, it requested to condone the delay if any and bring her on record as a plaintiff.
Adv or plaintiff submitted to passed suitable order Say of the defendant no 1 reflects that C/s is moved after limitation and not maintainable. Suit is already abated.
Considering the reason mentioned in the C/s I inclined to allow the C/s and passed suitable order
ORDER
1. C/s 2175 of 2019 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
2. Abatement is also set aside.
3. C/s disposed off according.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 05-03-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 113416/2019
Filing Date: 04-12-2019
First Hearing Date: 05th December 2019
Decision Date: 05th March 2021
Court Number And Judge: 7-COURT  07 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    05 Mar 2021
    Order Details: Chamber summons
Pdf Text: Dt: 05/03/21
C/s 2175/19
In Suit :475/12
CORAM : R.M.SADRANI ( C.R. NO.07)
Adv Heena Mody for plaintiff present.
Defendant and advocate absent.
Order in C/s 2175 of 2019
This c/s is taken out by the applicant i.e. LRs of plaintiff
no.10. According to applicant her husband expired on
28/08/2017. She is a illiterate lady not aware about the
proceeding. Just before filing the present C/s she came
to know from other plaintiff about present proceeding.
Therefore, it requested to condone the delay if any and
bring her on record as a plaintiff.
Adv or plaintiff submitted to passed suitable order Say
of the defendant no 1 reflects that C/s is moved after
limitation and not maintainable. Suit is already abated.
Considering the reason mentioned in the C/s I inclined
to allow the C/s and passed suitable order
ORDER
1. C/s 2175 of 2019 is allowed in terms of prayer
clause (a) and (b).
2. Abatement is also set aside.
3. C/s disposed off according.
Judge.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.