Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

Sanjesh Chunilal JainVsDayashankar H. Pathak

CNR MHCC010122982019966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHERWISE
Decision Date: 04th January 2022

TrustJury record updated 24 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100484/2019
Registration Date
26 Nov 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Sanjesh Chunilal Jain

    Respondent

    1. 1Dayashankar H. Pathak

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 09-12-2019
Business: Shri. Harish Sakpal, Advocate for Plaintiff present.
On request of Shri. Sakpal, adjd to13/12/2019, for taking further stpes.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2019

Date: 13-12-2019
Business: Parties and Advocate absent,  adjd to 16/12/2019.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 16-12-2019

Date: 16-12-2019
Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  Shri Jain prays for issue of Warrant u/o.XXI, Rule 48 of CPC, without issue of notice, stating that the Execution Application is filed within two years of passing of Decree.  Hence, issue warrant as prayed for, returnable on 09/04/2020.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 09-04-2020

Date: 09-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 21-04-2020

Date: 21-04-2020
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 18-06-2020

Date: 18-06-2020
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 31-07-2020

Date: 31-07-2020

Date: 24-09-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 05-11-2020

Date: 05-11-2020

Date: 22-12-2020
Business: Parties and advocate are absent adjourned to 22/02/2021.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 22-02-2021

Date: 22-02-2021
Business: Shri Ramesh Jain advocate for plaintiff present.
Exe.application marked as Exh.A(Colly.).
Letter bearing No.NB.HRMD.SAL/3703/SAL67/2019-20, dated 26/02/2020, received for NABARD, under this office Inward No. 2705  dated 02/03/2020,  t.o.r. and marked as Exh.B.
As per the said letter warrant u/o.XXI, Rule 48 of CPC, has been returned without execution as the defendant has been dismissed for the services of NABARD.
In view of this Shri Jain seeks time to take further steps and on his request matter adjourned to 12/04/2021.
On request of Shri Jain matter adjourned to 12/04/2021.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 12-04-2021

Date: 12-04-2021
Business: Today being declared holiday, adjourned to 12/06/2021.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2021

Date: 12-06-2021

Date: 03-08-2021
Business: Parties and advocate are absent adjourned to  28/08/2021, by way of last chance.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 28-08-2021

Date: 28-08-2021
Business: Shri Ramesh Jain advocate for plaintiff present.
On request of Shri Jain adjourned to 21/09/2021, for taking instructions.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2021

Date: 21-09-2021
Business: Shri Ramesh Jain Advocate for Plaintiff present.
On request of Shri Jain, for taking instructions, adjourned to 18/10/2021.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 18-10-2021

Date: 18-10-2021
Business: In view of declaration of Holiday vide Office Order No.213 of 2021, adjourned to 23/10/2021.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 23-10-2021

Date: 23-10-2021
Business: Parties and Advocate absent matter adjourned to 03/12/2021, by way of last chance.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2021

Date: 03-12-2021
Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, advocate for plaintiff present.
On request of Shri Jain for taking instruction, adjourned to 04/01/2022.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 04-01-2022

Date: 04-01-2022
Business: Shri Ramesh Jain advocate for plaintiff present.
Letter from employer of defendant (Exh.B), is on record stating inability to comply with warrant of u/o.XXI, Rule 48 of CPC, issued against salary of defendant as the defendant has been dismissed form the services on 08/01/2020.
Record also shows that despite granting several adjournment no further steps have been taken in the matter by the advocate for plaintiff and today he makes statement that exe.application be disposed off.
In view of this exe.application stand disposed off.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHERWISE
Disposal Date: 04-01-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 111204/2019
Filing Date: 26-11-2019
First Hearing Date: 09th December 2019
Decision Date: 04th January 2022
Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.