Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mrs. Supriya Rakesh Kadam alias Supriya Ramesh PalkarVsMr. Hemant Ramesh Palkar and anr.

CNR MHCC0101221920193-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 05th January 2022

TrustJury record updated 24 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
104452/2019
Registration Date
26 Nov 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Petitioner

  1. 1Mrs. Supriya Rakesh Kadam alias Supriya Ramesh Palkar

Respondent

  1. 1Mr. Hemant Ramesh Palkar and anr.

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 17-12-2019
Business: Plaintiff present.
Adv. Naik for plaintiff present.
Adv. Snehal Gambhir for defendant present.
Adv. Hema Waval for defendant no. 2 present and filed original NM no. 4452/19 along with affidavit.
Matter stands Adj for reply to NM on 10.02.2020.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 10-02-2020

Date: 10-02-2020
Business: Court is on leave
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 06-04-2020

Date: 06-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 29-05-2020

Date: 29-05-2020
Business: In view of Lockdown period pursuant to the declaration of Novel Corona Virus (Covid-19) as global pandemic by WHO and as per Office Order 78 of 2020, matter adjourned
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 16-06-2020

Date: 16-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2020

Date: 23-09-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2020

Date: 03-12-2020
Business: None present for plaintiff and Defendant
Matter stands Adj for Reply to 28.01.2021
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2021

Date: 28-01-2021
Business: None for Plaintiff.
Advocate Sameer Sawant for defendant no.1 present and sought time to file reply.
The case is adjourned to 11.03.2021 for reply.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2021

Date: 11-03-2021
Business: Court is on leave. Hence Board is discharged.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 12-04-2021

Date: 12-04-2021
Business: Declared holiday as per office order 78 of 2021
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 01-07-2021

Date: 01-07-2021
Business: In view of office order No. 120/2021 dtd. 27.06.2021 r/w  Office Order No.106/2021 dtd 14.06.2021 of Hon''ble Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai, pursuant to circular dtd. 09.06.2021 of Hon''ble Bombay High Court prescribing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in the wake of sharp surge in COVID-19 cases and the views of stakeholders, the matter is adjourned.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2021

Date: 17-08-2021
Business: Matter called out at
Adv. Sadika Naik for plaintiff present.
Adv. Sameer Sawant for defendant no. 1 present. He tendered reply to NM T.O.R.
Copy supplied to other side.
Matter stands adjourned to 05-10-2021 for hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2021

Date: 05-10-2021
Business: Plaintiff alongwith Adv. Anuskha A. Shresta present.
Deft. No.1 alongwith Adv. Sameer Sawant present.
As court is busy in hearing final argument in SU No.3002/04. Hence,
matter stands adjourned to 20.11.2021 for hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-11-2021

Date: 20-11-2021
Business: Court is on leave. Hence, Board is discharged.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 05-01-2022

Date: 05-01-2022
Business: Matter called out at 3.34 p.m.
Adv. Sadika Naik for plaintiff present.
Adv. Sameer Sawant for Deft. No.1 present.
Deft. No.2 in person present.
Heard both the sides.
The Deft. No.2 filed instant NM for allowing her to file WS by condoning the delay. The plaintiff has no objection.  However, the Deft. No.1 objected for condonation of delay. Looking to the fact that suit is for partition and the trial is not yet begun, no prejudice will cause, if the Deft. No.2 is allowed to file WS.
Therefore, I proceed to pass the following order.
1.   NM No.4452/19 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.  Deft. No.2 is allowed to file WS within a period of 15 days from the date of order.
3.   NM is disposed of accordingly.
The WS of Deft. No.2 is already on record. It is already marked as Exh.5.
Deft. No.2 is directed to supply copy of WS to Deft. No.1.
Matter stands adjourned to 17.03.2022 for Issues.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 05-01-2022

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 112506/2019
Filing Date: 26-11-2019
First Hearing Date: 17th December 2019
Decision Date: 05th January 2022
Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1
05 Jan 2022
Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 05.01.2022
Sr. No. 2
SU 2359/17
@NM 4452/19
CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI.A.H.LADDHAD (C.R. 03)
Matter called out at 3.34 p.m.
Adv. Sadika Naik for plaintiff present.
Adv. Sameer Sawant for Deft. No.1 present.
Deft. No.2 in person present.
Heard both the sides.
The Deft. No.2 filed instant NM for allowing her to file WS by condoning
the delay. The plaintiff has no objection. However, the Deft. No.1 objected
for condonation of delay. Looking to the fact that suit is for partition and
the trial is not yet begun, no prejudice will cause, if the Deft. No.2 is
allowed to file WS.
Therefore, I proceed to pass the following order.
1. NM No.4452/19 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Deft. No.2 is allowed to file WS within a period of 15 days from the
date of order.
3. NM is disposed of accordingly.
The WS of Deft. No.2 is already on record. It is already marked as Exh.5.
Deft. No.2 is directed to supply copy of WS to Deft. No.1.
Matter stands adjourned to 17.03.2022 for Issues.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.