Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Ravindra Ganpat Raut +1 moreVsMHADA +1 more

CNR MHCC0101207420198-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 26th April 2022

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103367/2019
Registration Date
16 Dec 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Petitioner

    1. 1Ravindra Ganpat Raut
    2. 2Rashmi Sitaram Pai

    Respondent

    1. 1MHADA
    2. 2Mumbai Building Repairs And Recibstruction Board

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 39

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 16-01-2020
Business: None present for plaintiff.
None present for defendant.
Matter is adjd. for proof of service to 21.03.2020.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 21-03-2020

Date: 21-03-2020
Business: Due to direction to combat Corona Virus, board is discharged, as
only urgent matters are taken up.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 20-08-2020

Date: 20-08-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 07-12-2020

Date: 07-12-2020
Business: None present for the plaintiff.
None present for the defendant.
Matter is adjd. to 19.03.2021 for Steps by the plaintiff or Proof service of writ of summons and NM.
Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 19-03-2021

Date: 19-03-2021
Business: None for plaintiffs.
On 28.12.2019, leave was granted to the plaintiffs to register NM. However, till date, the plaintiffs have not filed the registered NM No.103/2020 is dismissed. Last chance is granted to the plaintiffs for service of summons.
Matter is adjd. to 17.06.2021 for service of summons.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2021

Date: 17-06-2021
Business: Due to COVID-19 pandemic.
Matter is adjourned.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 03-08-2021

Date: 03-08-2021
Business: None present.
Matter is adjd. to 07/10/2021 for service.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2021

Date: 07-10-2021
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2021

Date: 09-12-2021
Business: As Court is busy in hearing argument in SU 3584/11. Hence, board is discharged.
Matter is adjd. to 16.03.2022 for service.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 16-03-2022

Date: 16-03-2022
Business: None present for plaintiff.
None present for defendant.
It appears that, since long plaintiff and his adv. Are absent, and he did not take steps for service of writ of summons. Hence,  Matter adjourned for dismissal order to 26/04/22.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 26-04-2022

Date: 26-04-2022
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Mr. Pathak h/f Adv. Sneha Prabhu defendant Nos. 1 and 2/MHADA is present.
KB LO at 2.50 pm.
It appears that, since long plaintiff is absent and plaintiff did not take steps for service of writ of summons or for proceeding further and therefore, matter is kept for dismissal order today. Today, also plaintiff and his advocate are absent. From the above conduct of plaintiff it appears that plaintiff is not interested to proceed further with the suit. Therefore, it will be appropriate to dismiss the suit as per Order 9 Rule 2/5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Hence, suit is dismissed as per Order 9 Rule 2/5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Proceeding is closed.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 26-04-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 112929/2019
Filing Date: 23-11-2019
First Hearing Date: 16th January 2020
Decision Date: 26th April 2022
Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    26 Apr 2022
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :SUIT/0103367/2019
Ravindra Ganpat Raut Vs MHADA
Date : 26-04-2022
Business : None present for plaintiff. Adv. Mr. Pathak h/f Adv. Sneha
Prabhu defendant Nos. 1 and 2/MHADA is present. KB LO
at 2.50 pm. It appears that, since long plaintiff is absent and
plaintiff did not take steps for service of writ of summons or
for proceeding further and therefore, matter is kept for
dismissal order today. Today, also plaintiff and his advocate
are absent. From the above conduct of plaintiff it appears
that plaintiff is not interested to proceed further with the
suit. Therefore, it will be appropriate to dismiss the suit as
per Order 9 Rule 2/5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Hence,
suit is dismissed as per Order 9 Rule 2/5 of the Code of
Civil Procedure. Proceeding is closed.
Nature of Disposal : DISMISSED
Disposal Date : 26-04-2022
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.