Skip to main content
Commercial Suit

Jyoti Datta WaghVsIndubai Chandrakant Lihinar

CNR MHCC01011902201931-COURT 31 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DECREED
Decision Date: 12th July 2022

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101270/2021
Registration Date
11 Oct 2021

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec XXVII

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 16-11-2021
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    The plaintiff is directed to issue writ of summons for service upon the defendant.
    Matter is adjd.to 22-12-2021 for writ of summons.
    Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
    Next Hearing Date: 22-12-2021
    
    Date: 22-12-2021
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    Matter is adjd.to 05-01-2022 for writ of summons.
    Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
    Next Hearing Date: 05-01-2022
    
    Date: 05-01-2022
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Time is extended for service of writ of summons.
    Issue writ of summons to the defendant.
    Matter is adjd.to 07-02-2022 for writ of summons
    Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
    Next Hearing Date: 07-02-2022
    
    Date: 07-02-2022
    Business: The matter was on board dated 07/02/2022.
    Holiday was declared on 07/02/2022 to mourn the sad demise of Bharat Ratna Lata Mangeshkar on 06/02/2022.
    Matter is adjd.to  07-03-2022 for admission denial.
    Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
    Next Hearing Date: 14-03-2022
    
    Date: 14-03-2022
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present and filed affidavit of service with original writ of summons and bailiff report  t.o.r. and marked as Exh.2
    Matter is adjd.to 29-03-2022 for ex parte order
    Next Purpose: ORDER
    Next Hearing Date: 29-03-2022
    
    Date: 29-03-2022
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    None for defendant.
    On perusal of record, it appears that writ of summons was sent to the defendant through Court bailiff and it was duly served upon the defendant on 14-12-2021 as per bailiff report on writ of summons annexed with  affidavit of service Exh. 2 . The defendant failed to appear. Hence, suit to proceed ex parte against the defendant.
    Matter is adjd.to  19-04-2022 for ex parte evidence.
    Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 19-04-2022
    
    Date: 19-04-2022
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    Matter is adjd.to  18-06-2022 for ex parte evidence.
    Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 18-06-2022
    
    Date: 18-06-2022
    Business: None present.
    Adjourned to 08-07-2022 for ex parte evidence.
    LO 12.30 pm
    Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff appeared and filed Affidavit of examination in chief and document.
    Exh.3 - Affidavit of examination in chief of plaintiff – put up for verification
    Exh.4 – List of documents.  O- filed
    Adjourned to 08-07-2022 for verification and exhibition of documents.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 08-07-2022
    
    Date: 08-07-2022
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    Witness of plaintiff present. Affidavit of examination is already filed on last date. O- Read and recorded in evidence.
    Exh- 5 Promissory Note dt. 2nd June 2016 to plaint.
    Exh- 6 Plaintiffs advocates letter dt. 20.05.2019 being to plaint along with the postal records in connection with the transmission and delivery thereof.
    Exh-7 Money lender license.
    Exh-8 Forms under Bombay Money Lending Act
    Exh-9 Books of Account.
    Original was shown to witness. Its content are same as compared from original.
    Exh-10 Evidence closing pursis filed by adv. for plaintiff.
    Heard arguments of adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff.
    Adjd for exparte judgment to 11/07/2022
    Next Purpose: EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 11-07-2022
    
    Date: 11-07-2022
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    Court is busy in passing exparte judgment in commercial suit NO. 55/21, 1117/21 and 53/21. Hence adjourned.
    Adjd for exparte judgment to 12/07/2022
    Next Purpose: EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 12-07-2022
    
    Date: 12-07-2022
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    Court pronounced judgment in open court
    Exh-11 Judgment
    FRSR the following order is passed
                  ORDER
           1. Commercial Suit No.1270 of 2021 is decreed with costs.
           2. The defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.7,62,356/- to the plaintiff along with interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum on the principal amount of Rs.5,00,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till realization within 3 months from the date of this decree.
           3. Defendant shall bear the costs of the suit.
           4. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per rule.
           5. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
    (Judgment pronounced in the open Court)
    Nature Of Disposal: DECREED
    Disposal Date: 12-07-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 112690/2019
    Filing Date: 21-11-2019
    First Hearing Date: 16th November 2021
    Decision Date: 12th July 2022
    Court Number And Judge: 31-COURT 31  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    5
    Final Order 5Full order available
    12 Jul 2022

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Dt.04/08/2022 Commercial 1270/21 Disposed of Exh-12 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. A. S. SALGAR, AD-HOC JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE (COURT ROOM NO. 31) NOB TOB Application filed by adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff for correction in judgment. It is marked as Exh.12 ORDER passed below Exh. 12 1. Speaking to the minutes, the Court rectifies the typographical errors in the Judgment as follows :- Instead of “Commercial Summery Suit”, the same be read as “Commercial…

    Read Full Order
    Final Order 4Full order available
    12 Jul 2022

    Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: 1 Judgment in Com. Suit No.1270/2021 Lodged on : 21.11.2019 Admitted on : 11.10.2021 Decided on : 12.07.2022 Duration : Y M D 2 7 21 COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.1270 of 2021 CNR NO. : MHCC010119022019 Exh.11 Jyoti Datta Wagh, Age 31 years, of Mumbai an adult, Indian Inhabitant, having her address at 1/11, Ram Niwas Chawl Sunder Baug, Kurla (West), Mumbai – 400 070 through her C.A. Manjusha Nandkishor Shete. ...Plaintiff Versus Indubai Chandrakant…

    Read Full Order
    Final Order 3Full order available
    12 Jul 2022

    Order Details: Order below exhibit Pdf Text: 1 OBE 12 in Comm. Suit 1270 of 2021 ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT 12 IN COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.1270 of 2021 Jyoti Datta Wagh ...Plaintiff Versus Indubai Chandrakant Lihinar ….Defendant Appearance: Adv. Mr. Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff. CORAM : SHRI. A.S.SALGAR ADHOC JUDGE, (C.R.NO.31) DATED : 4th AUGUST 2022 ORDER Heard Learned Advocate Ramesh Jain for the plaintiff. It is submitted by the Learned Advocate for the plaintiff that inadvertently in the Judgment dated 12.07.2022…

    Read Full Order
    Final Order 2Full order available
    12 Jul 2022

    Order Details: Order below exhibit Pdf Text: ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT 1 IN COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.1270 of 2021 Jyoti Datta Wagh ...Plaintiff Versus Indubai Chandrakant Lihinar ….Defendant Appearance: Adv. Mr. Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff. CORAM : SHRI. A.S.SALGAR ADHOC JUDGE, (C.R.NO.31) DATED : 4th AUGUST 2022 ORDER In view of order passed on Exhibit 12, the typographical error in the Judgment be corrected. Speaking to the minutes, the Court rectifies the typographical errors in the Judgment as follows : Instead of…

    Read Full Order
    Final Order 1Full order available
    12 Jul 2022

    Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: 1 Judgment in Com. Sum Suit No.1270/2021 Lodged on : 21.11.2019 Admitted on : 11.10.2021 Decided on : 12.07.2022 Duration : Y M D 2 7 21 COMMERCIAL SUMMERY SUIT NO.1270 of 2021 CNR NO. : MHCC010119022019 Exh.11 Jyoti Datta Wagh, Age 31 years, of Mumbai an adult, Indian Inhabitant, having her address at 1/11, Ram Niwas Chawl Sunder Baug, Kurla (West), Mumbai – 400 070 through her C.A. Manjusha Nandkishor Shete. ...Plaintiff Versus…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.