SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Pradnya Rajesh Mhatre +1 moreVsPravin Dattatray Mhatre +3 more
CNR MHCC01011851201962-COURT 62 AD-HOC ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 08th April 2022
TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 103090/2019
- Registration Date
- 25 Nov 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
6Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec Order 39 · Rule 2
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 16-12-2019 Business: Advocate Mr. Shirke for Plaintiff present and filed draft Notice of Motion with affidavit in support of Notice of Motion. Leave to register Notice of Motion is granted. He also requested to issue writ of summons. O-Issue writ of summons as prayed. None present for Defendant. Court is busy in recording evidence in suit no.7793/00 and suit no.6329/04, hence case is adjourned to 28/02/2020. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2020 Date: 28-02-2020 Business: Advocate Ms. Sawant for Plaintiff present and filed affidavit of service in respect of writ of summons, NM, plaint and documents t.o.r. He also filed registered Notice of Motion no.4817/19 with affidavit in support, t.o.r. None present for Defendants. Case is adjourned to 24/07/2020 for NM reply. Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 24-07-2020 Date: 24-07-2020 Business: Adjd. to 21.09.2020 due to Covid-19. Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2020 Date: 21-09-2020 Business: None present for plaintiff. None present for Defendant. Due to Corona it seems no parties turn to the court hence adjd. to 14/12/2020. Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 14-12-2020 Date: 14-12-2020 Business: court is on Leave. Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2021 Date: 26-02-2021 Business: None present for plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff has already filed affidavit of service. Defendants did not appear. Matter adjourned for order to 04.05.2021. Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 04-05-2021 Date: 26-02-2021 Business: None present for plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff has already filed affidavit of service. Defendants did not appear. Matter adjourned for order to 04.05.2021. Judge Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 04-05-2021 Date: 04-05-2021 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2021 Date: 04-05-2021 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2021 Date: 27-07-2021 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2021 Date: 27-07-2021 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2021 Date: 05-10-2021 Business: None present for both parties. Affidavit of service filed by the plff on 28.02.2020 shows that deft No.1 and 2 are properly served with N.M. and writ of summons but they did not appear hence, suit and N.M.No.4817/2019 to proceed ex-parte against those defts. Deft Nos.3 and 4 are not served properly hence, plff to serve those defts properly. Matter is adjd. for service on deft Nos.3 and 4 to 15.12.2021. Judge Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 15-12-2021 Date: 15-12-2021 Business: None present for both parties. Plff has not taken steps to serve deft No.3 and 4 properly with NM No.4817/2019 and suit summons hence, matter be kept for order on next date as nobody is present for plff. Matter is adjd. for order to 04.03.2022. Next Purpose: ORDER Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2022 Date: 04-03-2022 Business: None present for plff. None present for deft. K.B. L.O. at 3.45 p.m. None appeared for the plaintiff. Steps not taken to serve the deft nos3 and 4 properly with NM No.4817/2019 hence, said NM is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Plaintiff has also not served defendant Nos.3 and 4 properly with writ of summons hence, suit is dismissed in default against deft Nos.3 and 4. Matter is adjd. for Ex-parte evidence against deft nos.1 and 2 to 09.06.2022. Judge L.O. at 4.05 p.m. Adv Ms. Bhagyashree Shelke h/f Adv Sawant for plff present and submitted that plaintiffs want to withdraw the suit and plaintiffs have sent a letter to that effect to the advocate on whatsapp. She requested to prepone the date for withdrawal of the suit. On her request, for the reason stated by her, date is preponed and the date given earlier is changed to 31.03.2022 for ex-parte evidence. Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 31-03-2022 Date: 31-03-2022 Business: None present for both parties. K.B. L.O.at 11.40 a.m. Adv Ms. Shelke h/f Adv Sawant for plff present and seeks adjournment by submitting that plffs want to withdraw the suit but letter in that regard is received under signature of plff No.1 only by the adv on record. None present for defts. On request oif adv for plff, matter is adjd. for withdrawal to 08.04.2022. Next Purpose: WITHDRAWAL Next Hearing Date: 08-04-2022 Date: 08-04-2022 Business: None present for both parties. K.B. L.O. at 5.15 pm. None appeared for the plff despite keeping back the matter till 5.15 p.m. Adjournment was claimed by adv for plff on previous date by submitting that plaintiffs want to withdraw the suit. Any application is not filed today for seeking permission to withdraw the suit. Plffs have failed to adduce evidence hence, suit is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT Disposal Date: 08-04-2022
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 112663/2019 Filing Date: 20-11-2019 First Hearing Date: 16th December 2019 Decision Date: 08th April 2022 Court Number And Judge: 62-COURT 62 AD-HOC ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 108 Apr 2022
08 Apr 2022
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 08/04/2022 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI P.P.RAJVAIDYA (C.R. NO.62) 18 SU 3090/19 None present for both parties. K.B. L.O. at 5.15 pm. None appeared for the plff despite keeping back the matter till 5.15 p.m. Adjournment was claimed by adv for plff on previous date by submitting that plaintiffs want to withdraw the suit. Any application is not filed today for seeking permission to withdraw the suit. Plffs have failed to adduce evidence hence, suit is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Judge -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
