Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 13 Feb 2020 · CNR MHCC010117622019
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: CS No.2075/2019 ..1.. S.C. Suit No.2833/2014 CNR No. MHCC01-011762-2019 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.2075 OF 2019 IN S.C. SUIT NO.2833 OF 2014 Smt. Kamladevi Yadav and others. .. Plaintifs Versus Ambikaprasad Yadav and others. .. Defendants Advocates Sujit Nikam for plaintifs. B. S. Gaikwad for defendant no.1. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE Sunil T. Soor. (COURT No.: 2) DATED : 13th February, 2020 ORAL ORDER Chamber summons is taken out on behalf of plaintifs to amend the plaint as per schedule annexed to chamber summons. 2. Contention of advocate for plaintifs is that plaintif no.2 filed his affdavit of examination-in-chief on 09.10.2018 and copy of the same is duly served upon defendants. However on 14.03.2019, advocate for defendant no.3 appeared before the Court and informed about subsequent change in the Management of defendant no.3's partnership firm in terms of conversion of defendant no.3's partnership firm namely S. B. Developers into Private Limited Company namely 'Snehanjali and S. B. Developers Pvt. Ltd'. Hence it is necessary to amend the plaint by adding 'Snehanjali and S. B. Developers Pvt. Ltd'., in place of defendant no.3. Amendment is due to -- 1 of 5 -- CS No.2075/2019 ..2.. S.C. Suit No.2833/2014 subsequent events. It does not change cause of action and nature of the suit. Proposed amendment is necessary to decide real controversy between the parties and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. Hence he prayed to make Chamber Summons absolute. 3. Advocate for defendant no.1 filed affdavit in reply. Though advocate for defendant no.1 opposed Chamber Summons on the ground that plaintifs have not prayed for delay condonation but he orally submitted to allow chamber summons with cost. 4. Plaintifs have filed present suit against defendant nos.1 to 3 for declaration that they alongwith defendant no.1 are lawful occupants of old premises i.e., Tenement No.195 in building no.5 in Maharashtra Housing Board Colony, Swadeshi Mill Compound, V. N. Purav Marg, Sion Trombay Road, Chunabhatti, Mumbai and entitled to transit accommodation rent and receive allotment of permanent alternate accommodation proposed to be alloted on redevelopment in lieu of old premises. 5. Plaintifs filed on record letter dated 14.03.2019 issued by Authorized Signatory of 'Snehanjali and S. B. Developers Pvt. Ltd'. It is addressed to advocate for plaintifs stating that defendant no.3 i.e., M/s. S. B. Group also known as S. B. Developers is a partnership firm has been converted into a Private Limited Company under the name and style as 'Snehanjali and S. B. Developers Pvt. Ltd'. (the company) on 14.01.2019 and annexed Certificate of Incorporation dated 14.01.2019. It is also mentioned in said letter that upon reconstitution of defendant no.3 from partnership firm to a -- 2 of 5 -- CS No.2075/2019 ..3.. S.C. Suit No.2833/2014 Private Limited Company, defendant No.3 is not in existence as partnership firm. Hence the company is not in position to file vakalatnama in the matter till plaintif's incorporates name of said company in cause title of the suit. Through said letter, advocate for plaintifs was also advised to carry out necessary amendment in cause title of the suit so that name of 'M/s. S. B. Group' be replaced with the name of 'Snehanjali and S. B. Developers Pvt. Ltd'. 6. Plaintifs claimed substantial reliefs against defendant no.3 i.e., M/s. S. B. Group as a developer. Due to change of it in Private Limited Company namely 'Snehanjali and S. B. Developers Pvt. Ltd'., amendment is necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. Proposed amendment do not change cause of action, nature of suit and it is necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties. It is evident that amendment of the plaint is necessary due to happening of subsequent event during pendancy of the suit. Under the above facts and circumstances, following order. ORDER 1. Chamber Summons No.2075 of 2019 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). 2. Plaintifs to carry out amendment as per schedule annexed to chamber summons within 14 days from the date of this order. 3. Plaintifs shall file amended plaint on record and serve copy of same on defendants including newly added defendant no.3 i.e., 'Snehanjali and S. B. Developers Pvt. Ltd' in place of original defendant no.3 i.e., M/s. SB Group. 4. No order as to costs. -- 3 of 5 -- CS No.2075/2019 ..4.. S.C. Suit No.2833/2014 5. Accordingly, chamber summons is disposed of. (S. T. Soor) Judge Date : 13.02.2020 Gr. Bombay Typed on : 13.02.2020 HHJ signed on : -- 4 of 5 -- CS No.2075/2019 ..5.. S.C. Suit No.2833/2014 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 13.02.2020, 5.30 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME Mrs. V. N. Rajgole. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) H.H.J. Shri. S. T. Soor C.R.No.02 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 13.02.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 13.02.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 13.02.2020 -- 5 of 5 --
