Full Order Text
Order 1 · 29 Jan 2020 · CNR MHCC010117352019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 NM 4286-19 in SU No. 2694-2019 CNR NO.MHCC01-011735-19 IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4286 OF 2019 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 2694 OF 2019 M/s. Classic Corporation …...Plaintifs Versus The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai ..... Defendants Coram : Sanjay N. Yadav, Judge (Court Room no. 05) Date : 29th January, 2020. Appearance: Ld. Adv. Mr. B.P.Shukla for the plaintif. Ld. Adv. Mrs. Rawade for defendant/MCGM. ORDER 1. The plaintif by this notice of motion seeks injunction restraining the defendant corporation from interfering and stopping the ongoing project/construction of the building, situated at CS No. 1172, 1173, 1/1173, 1175 and 1176, Mandvi Division, Kambekar Street, Mumbai. 2. Heard Learned Advocate for the plaintif and Learned Advocate for the defendant corporation. 3. It is the case of the plaintif that the plaintif had undertaken to redevelop the above referred properties. It is -- 1 of 4 -- 2 NM 4286-19 in SU No. 2694-2019 sated that false complainant is raised by one Ahemed Hamid Poonawala. It is stated that defendants had issued IOD and sanction plan. Commencement Certifcate is issued to the plaintif. It is stated that property does not belong to Waqf Board. It is stated that the plaintif was issued notice on 16.08.2019 asking the plaintif to obtain and submit the NOC from the Waqf Board, failing which the action will be taken against the plaintif. The notice was replied by the plaintif. It is case of the plaintif that defendant corporation had initiated the action on the basis of notice dated 21.05.2019. The plaintif had approached the Waqf Board for review and withdrawal the notice. It is stated that ofcials of the defendant corporation are insisting the plaintif to approach the Waqf Board and obtain NOC, failing which stop work notice will be issued. 4. The defendant corporation had fled reply to the notice of motion. It is stated that the plaintif was directed to obtain NOC from Chief Executive Ofcer, Maharashtra Government vide letter dated 16.08.2019. It is stated that NOC is not submitted. 5. The plaintif seems to be aggrieved by the letter dated 16.08.2019. On perusal of the letter it shows that a letter was issued by Chief Executive Ofcer, Maharashtra Waqf Board and it is mentioned that the properties are Waqf properties and asked to stop the redevelopment work. In the letter, the plaintif was requested to submit the NOC from Chief Executive Ofcer, Maharashtra Government, Waqf Board, failing which strict action would be initiated against the -- 2 of 4 -- 3 NM 4286-19 in SU No. 2694-2019 plaintif. Pausing for while, it needs to be mentioned that the defendant corporation had not initiated any coercive action against the plaintif. Vide letter dated 16.08.2019. The plaintif is merely asked to obtain NOC from Waqk Board. The plaintif himself has contended that he had made an application to the Waqf Board for NOC. The letter does not show any intent of coercive action sought to be initiated against the plaintif by the defendant corporation. The plaintif is asked to submit NOC and on failure it was only informed that action would be initiated against the plaintif. At present there is nothing to indicate that the ofcers of the corporation are threatening to take action against the plaintif. In circumstance blanket injunction cannot be granted in favour of the plaintif restraining the defendant from interfering and stopping the ongoing project/construction of the suit building. The plaintifs has failed to make out the prima-facie case in his favour. The balance of convenience does not lies in favour of the plaintifs. The plaintifs would not be put to irreparable loss, if the injunction is refused. In the result, following order is passed. ORDER The Notice of Motion No. 4286 of 2019 is dismissed. (Sanjay N. Yadav) Judge, Date : 29.01.2020 City Civil Court, Mumbai. Dictated on : 29.01.2020 Transcribed on : 29.01.2020 Signed by HHJ on : 03.02.2020 -- 3 of 4 -- 4 NM 4286-19 in SU No. 2694-2019 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 04.02.2020 at 3.25 p.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mrs. K.S.Bhosale Name of the Judge (With Court Room no.) HHJ Shri. Sanjay N. Yadav C.R. no. 05 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 29.01.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 03.02.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 04.02.2020 -- 4 of 4 --
