Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mr. Naveed SiddiquiVsMs. Jennifer N. Sanjana and Ors.

CNR MHCC0101159320192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 15th February 2020

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
104233/2019
Registration Date
14 Nov 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 30-11-2019
    Business: Adv. Dipesh Siroya for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Malcolm Sinanporia Jinal Vani I/b Jennefer N. and associates  appeared for defendant no 1 and 2, and undertakes to file V/N on next date.
    Plaintiff is directed to file affidavit of service relating to defendant no 3.
    Adjourned for reply and W/s of defendant no 1 and 2 and service report of defendant no 3.
    Adjourned to 13.12.2019 for reply and service report.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2019
    
    Date: 13-12-2019
    Business: Adv. Deepesh Siroya for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Jinal Vani for defendant no 1 and 2 present.
    Adv. Sonali Salaskar for defendant no 3 present.
    Exh 2 Adv. for defendant no 1 and 2 filed V/N t.o.r
    Exh3 Adv. for defendant no 3 also filed V/N t.o.r
    They waived service of Writ of summons.
    Reply filed by defendant no 1 and 2
    Copy served to plaintiff.
    Adjourned for NM hearing to 10.01.2020
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 10-01-2020
    
    Date: 10-01-2020
    Business: None present. for plaintiff.
    Adv. Malclm Siganporia along with Ms. Jinal Vani I/b M/s. Jhangiani Narula and associates present.
    Adv. Sonali Salaskar for defendant No. 3 present.
    She filed reply to NM 4233/19. t.o.r.
    Copy be served upon plaintiff.
    Today matter is for Nm hearing but neither plaintiff nor his adv. are present.  In the interest of justice matter is adjourned for NM hearing in default for order.
    Adjourned for NM hearing at 11.00 a.m to 20.01.2020
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2020
    
    Date: 20-01-2020
    Business: None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Jinal Vani for defendant No. 1 and 2 present.
    KB
    LO
    Adv. Dipesh Siroya for plaintiff present and tendered registered NM 4233/19 t.o.r.
    Adv. Salaskar for defendant No. 3 present.
    He tendered registered NM 328/20 t.o.r.
    Say filed by adv. for
    Adv. Mr. Mallom Siganporia along with Adv. Jinal Vani for defendant No. 1 and 2 present.
    Heard both sides on NM No.328 of 2020
    Following order is passed below Notice of Motion No.328/2020
              Perused notice of motion, affidavit in support of it, reply of plaintiff and roznama of proceeding. Heard respective counsel for parties.
               Notice of motion is taken out by the defendant No.3 for condoning delay caused in filing written statement and to take the same on record.
            It is the contention of defendant No.3 that writ of summons was served upon them on 27.11.2019. Due to vacations their advocate was not available so authorised signatory of these defendant could not contact their advocate for finalizing the written statement. Consequently, they failed to file their written statement within stipulated period.  It is further contended that as soon as their advocate resumed their authorised signatory contacted her and finalized written statement.  But, delay has already been caused in filing written statement.  It is further contended that delay caused is not intentional or willful.  Accordingly, they made prayer in above terms.
            Plaintiff through advocate filed reply on notice of motion itself and leave it to the discretion of this Court.
          On perusal of roznama it appears that defendant No.3 appeared through their advocate on 13.12.2019 and their advocate waived service of writ of summons. However, defendant No.3 fairly conceded that writ of summons was served upon them on 27.11.2019.  They ought to have filed written statement within 30 days from the date of service of summons but they failed to do so.  They have taken out present notice of motion on 18.01.2020.  Thus, there is delay of about 22 days in taking out present notice of motion.  They assigned reason of non availability of advocate due to vacation as reason for not filing written statement within stipulated period. Reason assigned appears to be bona-fide as it is clear that as soon as advocate resumed written statement has been finalized. Therefore, considering the amended proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC applicable to the commercial dispute, I am inclined to allow present notice of motion subject to imposition of costs. Hence, pass following order-
    ORDER
    1.   Notice of Motion No.328 of 2020 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to payment of costs of Rs.1000/- (Rupees one Thousand only) to the plaintiff on or before 27.01.2020.
          Defendant No.3 is at liberty to deposit costs payable to the plaintiff in the Court.
    2.   After payment of costs, defendant No.3 has to file their written statement on next date i.e. 27.01.2020.
    3.     Accordingly, notice of motion is disposed off.
    With consent of parties adjourned to 27.01.2020 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 27-01-2020
    
    Date: 27-01-2020
    Business: Adv. Dipesh Siloya for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Siganporia for defendant No. 1 and 2 present.
    With consent of parties matter is adjourned to 1.02.2020 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 01-02-2020
    
    Date: 13-02-2020
    Business: Adv Deepesh Shiroya for plff present.
    Adv Malcolm Singaporia a/w Adv Jinal Vani for deft no. 1 and 2 present.
    Adv Saraskar for deft no. 3 present.
    Heard both parties on NM 4233/2019.
    Matter stands Adj for NM order to 15/02/2020.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 15-02-2020
    
    Date: 15-02-2020
    Business: Adv Tejas Shah for plff present.
    F. R. S. R. following order is passed -
    Order
    Notice of Motion No. 4233 of 2019 is rejected.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 15-02-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 112375/2019
    Filing Date: 14-11-2019
    First Hearing Date: 30th November 2019
    Decision Date: 15th February 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    15 Feb 2020

    Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: NM No.4233/2019 ..1.. Commercial Suit No.154/2019 CNR No.MHCC01-011593-2019 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4233 OF 2019 IN Commercial Suit No.154/2019 Naveed Siddiqui. .. Plaintif Versus Ms. Jennifer N. Sanjana and others. .. Defendants Advocates Dipesh Siroya for the plaintif. Malcolm Singaporia for defendant nos.1 and 2. Mrs. Sonali Salaskar for defendant no.3. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE Sunil T. Soor. (COURT No.: 2) DATED : 15th…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.