Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Ameeta Kirtikumar VoraVsRenuka A. Vora and Ors.

CNR MHCC0101156620193-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 10th December 2021

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
104221/2019
Registration Date
14 Nov 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 13-12-2019
Business: Court is on leave
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 04-02-2020

Date: 04-02-2020
Business: Adv. Thapa for plaintiff present and filed reply to NM.
Court is busy in dictating order in suit no. 380/18 and in 725/18.
Hence, board is discharged.
Matter stands Adj for reply to NM on 04.03.2020.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2020

Date: 04-03-2020
Business: Adv. Thapa for plaintiff present.
None present for defendant.
Reply is not filed.
Matter stands Adj for reply to NM on 23.04.2020.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2020

Date: 23-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 14-05-2020

Date: 14-05-2020
Business: In view of declaration of Novel Corona Virus (COVID-19) as global pandemic by WHO and Office Order No. 77 of 2020 matter adjourned.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 03-06-2020

Date: 03-06-2020
Business: In view of declaration of Novel Corona Virus (COVID-19) as global pandemic by WHO and Office Order No. 83 of 2020 matter adjourned.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2020

Date: 20-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2020

Date: 01-10-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 31-10-2020

Date: 31-10-2020
Business: Court is on  leave
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2020

Date: 19-12-2020
Business: Adv. Thapa for plaintiff present.
Matter stands Adj for reply to 06.02.2021
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2021

Date: 06-02-2021
Business: Advocate Ms.Pushpa Thapa for plaintiff present.
Advocate Yash Jain for defendant 1 and 3 present and submits that parties are trying work out a settlement.
By consent,the case is adjourned to 22.03.2021 for reply.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 22-03-2021

Date: 22-03-2021
Business: As Court is busy in hearing NM in SU NO.4971/19,2339/17, 7603/89, 134/19, dictating orders in SU No. 677/16, MA 42/19 and also in other matters on board. The case is adjourned.
The case is adjourned to 23.04.2021 for reply.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2021

Date: 23-04-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 05-07-2021

Date: 05-07-2021
Business: In view of office order No. 120/2021 dtd. 27.06.2021  of Hon''ble Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai, pursuant to circular dtd. 16.04.2021 issued by Hon''ble Bombay High Court prescribing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in the wake of sharp surge in COVID-19 cases and the views of stakeholders, the matter is adjourned.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 23-08-2021

Date: 23-08-2021
Business: Matter called out at 03.22 p.m.
Adv. Pushpa D. Thaper for plaintiff present.
Adv. Yash Jain I/b Halai & Co. for Deft. No. 1 present.
Defendant informed that they wanted to file rejoinder.
Further both the sides informed that parties are trying to explore the possibility of settlement. Hence, matter stands adjourned to 06.10.2021 for rejoinder.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 06-10-2021

Date: 06-10-2021
Business: Matter called out at 04.18 p.m.
Adv. Pushpa Thapa for plaintiff present.
Adv. Aditi Avad for defendant present.
Both the sides informed that settlement talks are going between the parties.
Matter stands adjourned to 22.11.2021 for settlement.
Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 22-11-2021

Date: 22-11-2021
Business: Court is on leave. Hence, Board is discharged.
Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2021

Date: 10-12-2021
Business: Matter called out at 11.14 a.m.
None present.
Kept back.
Later on at 2.47 p.m.
Adv. Pushpa Thapa for plaintiff present.
None present for defendant.
It appears from the roznama that since 06.02.2021, parties took adjournment on the ground of settlement.  On the other count, defendant by filing NM took objection in the evidence filed by the plaintiff and prayed to delete some portion of the evidence as those are in the nature of submission.  Defendant failed to tender reg. NM.  Hence, reg. NM No.4221/19 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
It appears that under settlement, matter is adjourn.
Therefore, plaintiff is directed to proceed with the matter.
Hence, matter be kept for evidence.
Matter stands adjourned to 07.01.2022 for Evidence.
In the event of failure to proceed with the matter by the plaintiff, suit
will be dismissed.
Later on at 3.18 p.m.
Adv. Yash Jain I/b Halai and Co. for defendant present.
Already adjourned to 07.01.2022.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 10-12-2021

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 112342/2019
Filing Date: 14-11-2019
First Hearing Date: 13th December 2019
Decision Date: 10th December 2021
Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1
10 Dec 2021
Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 10.12.2021
Sr. No. 1
SU 2787/11
@NM 4221/19
CORAM :- H.H.J. SHRI.A.H.LADDHAD (C.R. 03)
Matter called out at 11.14 a.m.
None present.
Kept back.
Later on at 2.47 p.m.
Adv. Pushpa Thapa for plaintiff present.
None present for defendant.
It appears from the roznama that since 06.02.2021, parties took adjournment
on the ground of settlement. On the other count, defendant by filing NM took
objection in the evidence filed by the plaintiff and prayed to delete some
portion of the evidence as those are in the nature of submission. Defendant
failed to tender reg. NM. Hence, reg. NM No.4221/19 is dismissed for
want of prosecution.
It appears that under settlement, matter is adjourn.
Therefore, plaintiff is directed to proceed with the matter.
Hence, matter be kept for evidence.
Matter stands adjourned to 07.01.2022 for Evidence.
In the event of failure to proceed with the matter by the plaintiff, suit
will be dismissed.
Later on at 3.18 p.m.
Adv. Yash Jain I/b Halai and Co. for defendant present.
Already adjourned to 07.01.2022.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.