Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Laxmichand Ramji Gala And OrsVsAnil Shivji Haria And Ors

CNR MHCC0101152920191-COURT 01 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 17th January 2020

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
104199/2019
Registration Date
13 Nov 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 17-01-2020
Business: Adv. Hingu for plaintiff present.
Deft. nos.3 and 4 present.
Adv. Joglekar for deft. nos.5 to 17 present.
Adv. Joglekar tendered registered N/M no.4199/19 and 4214/19.  T.O.R.
COMMON ORDER IN N/M NO.4199/19
AND N/M NO.4214/19
Heard.
The Ld. Counsel for the deft. nos.16(A) and 16(B) submitted that these defendants were not aware about the procedure.  They came to know about their name as defendants around April 2019.  Their earlier advocate did not return the documents.  They appointed new advocate and after obtaining certified copies of the proceedings, they have filed the N/M\''s.  They submit that the delay is not deliberate and intentional.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff opposed the N/M on the count that the defendants have not made out sufficient cause for delay.  The reasons are not supported by any material.
The matter was not cropped up for evidence.  It was for hearing of N/M of the plaintiff.  Substantial rights of the parties are involved.  The  contention of the deft. nos.16(A) and 16(B) on oath that they were not aware about the proceedings cannot be disbelieved when there is no otherwise material to counter the same.  There should not be hyper-technical and pedantic approach in dealing with such type of motions.  It would be in the interest of the parties if the defendant nos.16(A) and 16(B) are permitted to participate in the proceedings by putting their defence.  In the interest of justice, both these motions need consideration. Hence, it is expedient to pass the following order.
ORDER
1.    N/M No.4199/19 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today.
2.    N/M No.4214/19 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today.
3.    Payment of cost is subject precedent.
4.  On compliance of the order, written statements be taken on record.
5.   N/M No.4199/19 and N/M No.4214/19 are disposed off accordingly.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 17-01-2020

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 112283/2019
Filing Date: 13-11-2019
First Hearing Date: 17th January 2020
Decision Date: 17th January 2020
Court Number And Judge: 1-COURT 01 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
17 Jan 2020

Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Adv. Hingu for plaintiff present. Deft. nos.3 and 4 present. Adv. Joglekar for deft. nos.5 to 17 present. Adv. Joglekar tendered registered N/M no.4199/19 and 4214/19. T.O.R. COMMON ORDER IN N/M NO.4199/19 AND N/M NO.4214/19 Heard. The Ld. Counsel for the deft. nos.16(A) and 16(B) submitted that these defendants were not aware about the procedure. They came to know about their name as defendants around April 2019. Their earlier advocate did not return…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.