Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Gajanan Raghunath JoshiVsNiranjan Gajanan Joshi +1 more

CNR MHCC01011438201962-COURT 62 AD-HOC ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--CONSENT DECREE
Decision Date: 22nd February 2022

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102888/2019
Registration Date
11 Nov 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34 · 38

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 02-12-2019
    Business: None present for Plaintiff.
    None present for Defendant.
    Plaintiff is directed to file affidavit of service of writ of summons.
    Case is adjourned to 25.02.2020 for compliance.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2020
    
    Date: 25-02-2020
    Business: Advocate N. D. Jayvant for Plaintiff present and filed registered Notice of Motion no.277/2020 with affidavit in support, t.o.r.  He also filed original writ of summons which shows that summons is served upon Defendant nos.1 and 2 on 05/02/2020.
    Advocate Rajdeep Ghule h/f adv. Pandey for Defendant no.1 and 2 present and filed vakalatnama, t.o.r. and sought time to file NM reply. Considering submissions adjourned.
    Case is adjourned to 07/03/2020 for NM reply and Written Statement.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 07-03-2020
    
    Date: 07-03-2020
    Business: Advocate Mr. N. D. Jayvant for Plaintiff present
    Advocate Mr. Rakesh Pathak @ Defendant no.1 and 2 present and  served copy of Written Statement and NM reply upon advocate for Plaintiff.
    Case is adjourned to 02/04/2020 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 02-04-2020
    
    Date: 02-04-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 24-04-2020
    
    Date: 24-04-2020
    Business: National Lock down
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 04-06-2020
    
    Date: 04-06-2020
    Business: Case is adjd.to 22.06.20 in view of extension of Lockdown period as per office order no.83/20 dtd.01.06.20
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 22-06-2020
    
    Date: 22-06-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2020
    
    Date: 19-08-2020
    Business: Due to covid-19 pandemic and lockdown
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 08-10-2020
    
    Date: 08-10-2020
    Business: None present for plaintiffs.
    None present for Defendants.
    Due to Corona pandemic, it seems that parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to  08/01/2021 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 08-01-2021
    
    Date: 08-01-2021
    Business: None present for Plaintiff/s.
    None present for Defendant/s.
    As nobody is present for both the parties, considering the present pandemic condition, matter is adjd.for Notice of Motion hearing to  24.03.2021.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 22-02-2021
    
    Date: 22-02-2021
    Business: By preceipe.
    Adv Mr. M.R. Yadav h/f Adv Mr. Jaywant for plff present and requested to prepone the date for NM hearing by submitting that plff is presently aged 89 years  and plff is coming to Mumbai in next few days for treatment purposes.
    Deft Niranjan Joshi is present in person and filed copy of his AADHAR card as his ID proof.
    He has submitted that his advocate is unable to attend the Court today but he has no objection to prepone the date.
    By consent, date given earlier as 24.03.2021 is preponed to 05.03.2021 at 2.45 p.m.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2021
    
    Date: 05-03-2021
    Business: Adv Mr. N.D. Jaywant for plff present.
    Deft No.1 present in person.
    K.B.
    L.O.
    Adv Mr. N.D. Jaywant for plff present.
    Deft No.1 with his Adv Mr. Rakesh Pathak.
    Arguments of both the sides heard in N.M. No.277/2020.
    Advocate for the plff seeks time to file case laws in support his argument.
    By consent, matter is adjd. for further argument in NM to 11.03.2021.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2021
    
    Date: 11-03-2021
    Business: Adv Mr. Jaywant for plff present.
    Adv Mr. Rakesh Pathak for deft Nos.1 and  2 present.
    Deft no.2 is present in person.
    Arguments of both the sides heard.
    Matter is adjd. for order on 19.03.2021.
    Next Purpose: ORDER
    Next Hearing Date: 19-03-2021
    
    Date: 19-03-2021
    Business: None present for plff.
    Adv Mr. Pathak for defts present
    Stenographer is on leave. Alternate stenographer not provided by the office hence, it is not possible to pass order today.
    Matter is adjd. for order to 31.03.2021.
    Judge
    Next Purpose: ORDER
    Next Hearing Date: 31-03-2021
    
    Date: 31-03-2021
    Business: Adv. M.R. Yadav h/f. Advocate Jaywant for the plaintiff present.
    Adv. Pathak for defendants present.
    FRSR following order is passed in NM No.277 of 2020.
    ORDER
    Notice of Motion No.277 of 2020 is made absolute in terms of its prayer clauses (a) and (b).
    -------------
    Advocate for defendants filed application Exh.4 for seeking stay the effect, implementation and operation of the order dated 31.03.2021 passed earlier today in NM No.277 of 2020.
    Advocate for the plaintiff endorsed his reply on the application itself. Heard. Learned advocate for the plaintiff though vehemently opposed the prayer of grant of stay, considering the present Pandemic Condition and statement made at the bar on behalf of the defendants that defendants do not have any other place than the suit premises to reside so also, considering the nature of relief of mandatory injunction granted in favour of the plaintiff, this court is of the opinion that it is necessary to grant time of four weeks to the defendants to challenge the order of this court before the Hon’ble High Court hence, application Exh.4 is allowed.
    Effect and operation of the order dated 31.03.2021 passed in NM No.277 of 2020 is hereby stayed for four weeks from the date of uploading of the said order in CIS.
    -------------
    Matter adjourned for draft issues to 15.06.2021.
    Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
    Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2021
    
    Date: 15-06-2021
    Business: Adv. Tanay Mandur for plaintiff present and gave oral undertaking that he will file VP on behalf of the plaintiff on the next date. His oral undertaking is accepted.
    None present for defendant.
    On request of advocate appearing for the plaintiff today, matter adjourned for draft issues to 23.07.2021.
    Judge
    LO
    Rakesh Pathak present for the defendant and seeks time for filing draft issues.
    Already adjourned to 23.07.2021.
    Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
    Next Hearing Date: 23-07-2021
    
    Date: 23-07-2021
    Business: Court is on Leave.
    Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
    Next Hearing Date: 29-09-2021
    
    Date: 29-09-2021
    Business: Court is on Leave.
    Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
    Next Hearing Date: 15-12-2021
    
    Date: 15-12-2021
    Business: Adv Mr. Tanay Mandot appeared and filed vakalatnama on behalf of plff. at Exh.4 alongwith no objection of previous advocate. He submitted that deft No.1 has expired.
    None present for deft.No.2.
    Matter is adjd. for steps to 22.02.2022.
    Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
    Next Hearing Date: 22-02-2022
    
    Date: 22-02-2022
    Business: Adv Mr. Advait Sethna present for plff. and filed application Exh.5 for deleting name of deft No.1 on account of death of deft No.1.
    Adv Mr. Rakesh Pathak present for deft.No.2.
    Adv for deft No.2 endorsed his no objection on application Exh.5.
    Statement made in the application about causing death of deft No.1 on 25.06.2021 is supported by copy of death certificate produced with the application hence, since the advocate for deft No.2 has no objection, application Exh.5 is allowed.
    Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith.
    Judge
    K.B.
    L.O.
    Amendment carried out as per the order passed earlier today.
    Plaintiff Gajanan Raghunath Joshi is present in person with his learned advocate Shri Advait Sethana.
    Defendant No.2 is also present in person with his  learned advocate Shri Rakesh Pathak.
    Plaintiff and defendant No.2 have filed notarized consent terms at Exh.6.
    Defendant No.2 has filed affidavit Exh.7 separately in support of the consent terms.
    On enquiry, plaintiff and defendant No.2 both have admitted the contents of the consent terms to be true, correct and admissible to both of them. They admitted that para 6 of the consent terms is struck down by them by consent and they have counter signed the said striking out of para 6 of the consent terms. In the result, suit stands decreed in terms of consent terms Exh.6.
    A consent decree be drawn up accordingly in terms of Exh.6.
    Court fees be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules.
    Proceeding is closed.
    Authenticated copy of this roznama be given to the plaintiff and defendant No.2 as per rules.
    Judge
    L.O.
    Adv for plaintiff filed amended plaint at Exh.1/A.
    Suit is disposed off earlier today.
    Nature Of Disposal: CONSENT DECREE
    Disposal Date: 22-02-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 112138/2019
    Filing Date: 08-11-2019
    First Hearing Date: 02nd December 2019
    Decision Date: 22nd February 2022
    Court Number And Judge: 62-COURT 62 AD-HOC  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    22 Feb 2022

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 22/02/2022 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI P.P.RAJVAIDYA (C.R. NO.62) 14 SU 2888/19 Exh.5 Exh.6 Exh.7 Adv Mr. Advait Sethna present for plff. and filed application Exh.5 for deleting name of deft No.1 on account of death of deft No.1. Adv Mr. Rakesh Pathak present for deft.No.2. Adv for deft No.2 endorsed his no objection on application Exh.5. Statement made in the application about causing death of deft No.1 on 25.06.2021 is supported by copy of death…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.