Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Shri. Ranjitrai Hargovind Das Rathod - Applicant - Sanat Ranjitrai RathodVsM/s. M.B. Development Corporation And Ors

CNR MHCC0101136520199-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 26th February 2020

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102007/2019
Registration Date
08 Nov 2019

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 18-12-2019
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2020
    
    Date: 26-02-2020
    Business: Advocate Ms. Sapna Tawar for Plaintiff present
    Clerk of advocate for Defendant present and requesting to keep the matter back.
    K.B.
    L.O. at 4.10 p.m.
                          ORDER ON CHS NO.2007 OF 2019
    This Chamber Summons is taken out by applicant Sanat Rathod for allowing him to delete name of original deceased Plaintiff and to bring on record name of applicant in place of deceased Plaintiff because applicant is Legal representative and son of original deceased Plaintiff.  As mentioned in the affidavit filed by applicant in support of Notice of Motion the original Plaintiff died on 07/10/2019 leaving behind applicant, his 3 brothers namely Bhupendra Rathod, Anup Rathod, Paresh Rathod and one sister Smt. Vandana Khatri as heirs and legal representatives of deceased Plaintiff, hence according to applicants, Chamber Summons is necessary to be allowed.
    Mr. Laxminarayan Rathod, Partners of Defendant no.1 has filed his affidavit in reply and resisted Chamber Summons contending that applicant alone is not legal heir of deceased Plaintiff and 3 other brothers and sister of applicant are also heirs and legal representatives of original Plaintiff.
    Heard applicant\''s advocate as well as Defendant\''s advocate. Perused plaint which is for declaration that agreement dated 09/05/2012 between original Plaintiff and Defendants is valid and subsisting and for directions to Defendant to execute and register an agreement for permanent alternate accommodation with respect to suit premises in favour of Plaintiff.  Considering the prayer clause (a) and (b) of the plaint, I find that all the legal heirs of original Plaintiff are necessary to be brought on record because all those legal heirs also may be entitled for declaration as sought by applicant and they also may be entitled for permanent alternate accommodation in respect of suit premises.  Hence, to avoid further disputes between applicant and his brothers and sister, I find that this Chamber Summons can be allowed with the directions to applicant to delete name of original Plaintiff and to impleade himself along with his 3 brothers and 1 sister in place of original Plaintiff as heirs and legal representatives of Plaintiff because names of those brothers and sister of applicant are appearing in para no.4 of the affidavit filed in support of Chamber Summons. Hence, I proceed to pass following order-
                                         ORDER
    1. Chamber Summons no.2007 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) with further direction to applicant to implead names of his 3 brothers i.e. Bhupendra Rathod, Anup Rathod, Paresh Rathod and one sister Smt. Vandana Khatri as heirs and legal representatives of deceased Plaintiff along with applicant.
    2. Applicant is directed to carry out proposed amendment in the plaint within stipulated time provided by law.
    3. Applicant is further directed to serve the copies of amended plaint upon Defendants and to file typed copy of amended plaint for the record of the court.
    Defendants advocate made it clear that while Defendants are intending to file Written Statement, meanwhile Plaintiff expired and now court has allowed Chamber Summons for bringing on record LRs of original deceased Plaintiff by deleting name of original Plaintiff, hence Defendants will file their Written Statement in the matter after amendment will be carried out in the plaint and copy of amended plaint will be served upon Defendants or their advocate.  It is made clear that, Defendants right to file Written Statement beyond statutory time limit is automatically extended due to unfortunate death of Plaintiff.
    Case is adjourned to 22/04/2020 for Compliance.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 26-02-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 112086/2019
    Filing Date: 08-11-2019
    First Hearing Date: 18th December 2019
    Decision Date: 26th February 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 9-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    26 Feb 2020

    Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: Back Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :COURT 9 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :CHAMBER SUMMONS/0102007/2019 Shri. Ranjitrai Hargovind Das Rathod - Applicant - Sanat Ranjitrai Rathod Vs M/s. M.B. Development Corporation And Ors Date : 26-02-2020 Business : Advocate Ms. Sapna Tawar for Plaintiff present Clerk of advocate for Defendant present and requesting to keep the matter back. K.B. L.O. at 4.10 p.m. ORDER ON CHS NO.2007 OF 2019 This Chamber Summons is…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.