Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Tushar Savata Bankar +10 moreVsMCGM +1 more

CNR MHCC0101130320198-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 13th November 2019

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102852/2019
Registration Date
07 Nov 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    13

    Acts & Sections

    1

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 13-11-2019
    Business: By preceipe
    Adv.Shailesh Rai for plaintiff present tendered draft N/M alongwith affidavit in support. Leave is granted to register N/M.
    Adv. Mrs. R.M. Hazare for Deft/MCGM present.
    Heard both Ld.Adv. In ad-interim relief.
    Order on Ad-interim relief - After perusal of the plaint it transpires that total 11 plaintiff\''s have instituted in this suit in respect of 3 different buildings and they were allegedly alloted those buildings for different project.  Even though there will be common question of law, the facts are different and they have to file separate suits. Hence, plaintiffs are liberty to bring separate suits in accordance with law.
    Plaint is rejected under order 7 rule 11 of CPC . In view of therefore draft N/M disposed off. It be registered for statistical purpose.
    Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
    Disposal Date: 13-11-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 112026/2019
    Filing Date: 06-11-2019
    First Hearing Date: 13th November 2019
    Decision Date: 13th November 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    13 Nov 2019
    Order Details: Copy of Judgment
    Pdf Text: Dt.13/11/2019
    SU 2852/19
    CORAM : H.H.J SHRI.C. V. MARATHE (C.R.NO.8)
    By preceipe
    Adv.Shailesh Rai for plaintiff present tendered draft N/M
    alongwith affidavit in support. Leave is granted to register
    N/M.
    Adv. Mrs. R.M. Hazare for Deft/MCGM present.
    Heard both Ld.Adv. In adinterim relief.
    Order on Adinterim relief After perusal of the plaint it
    transpires that total 11 plaintiff's have instituted in this suit in
    respect of 3 different buildings and they were allegedly alloted
    those buildings for different project. Even though there will be
    common question of law, the facts are different and they have
    to file separate suits. Hence, plaintiffs are liberty to bring
    separate suits in accordance with law.
    Plaint is rejected under order 7 rule 11 of CPC. In view of
    therefore draft N/M disposed off. It be registered for
    statistical purpose.
    Judge
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.