Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 04 Mar 2020 · CNR MHCC010111752019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: :1: N. M. No.4066/2019 in Sum. Suit No.560/2013 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4066 OF 2019 CNR NO.: MHCC01-011175-2019 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 560 OF 2013 Mr. Arvind Dharmashi Khuthiya ...Plaintiff Versus M/s. Sai Prabha Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. and another ...Defendants Appearances:- Advocate Ms. Disha Vardhan for the plaintiff. Advocate Bhandary for the defendants. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE SONALI P. AGARWAL (C.R.NO. 14) DATED : 4th MARCH, 2020. ORAL ORDER Defendant has stated that on 20.08.2019, his Advocate had several matters in various Courts including the Hon’ble High Court. Ttherefore, when the matter was called out he could not remain present and he was held up in the Hon’ble High Court. It is further stated that he was having other matters including in the Small Causes Court, Bandra and Court Room No.40 also and therefore, Advocate for the defendants could not conduct the cross examination of the plaintiff’s witness and prayed to set aside “No cross” order. 2. Plaintiff has filed reply to this Notice of Motion and stated that defendants failed to appear on many dates in the Court. Plaintiff has further stated that the adjournment was granted subject to cost of -- 1 of 3 -- :2: N. M. No.4066/2019 in Sum. Suit No.560/2013 Rs.1000/- to defendants previously. Plaintiff has further stated that defendants are in habit of delaying the matter. Plaintiff has further stated that there is no documentary proof showing that defendant’s Advocate was held up in another Court. 3. Definitely, for the act of Advocate the parties should not suffer. Considering the fact that previously also Advocate for the defendants requested for adjournment for cross examination and paid cost of Rs.1000/- shows that matter is delayed due to defendants. But at the same time, it appears leave to defend is granted to defendant. Fair opportunity has to be given to defendant to defend the suit. But at the same time, plaintiff has to be compensated for delay caused by defendants. Hence, it will be proper to allow this Notice of Motion subject to cost. Hence, following order:- ORDER 1. Notice of Motion No.4066 of 2019 is allowed subject to cost of Rs.2,500/- to be given to plaintiff by defendants. 2. Notice of Motion No.4066 of 2019 stands disposed of. SONALI P. AGARWAL) Judge, Date: 04.03.2020. City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 04.03.2020 Transcribed on : 04.03.2020 Signed on : 04.03.2020 -- 2 of 3 -- :3: N. M. No.4066/2019 in Sum. Suit No.560/2013 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 05.03.2020 At 04:21 p.m. Mr. Subhash Sukhdeo Poul UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ SONALI P. Agarwal (C.R.NO.14) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 04.03.2020 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 04.03.2020 Judgment/Order uploaded on 05.03.2020 -- 3 of 3 --
