Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 05 Oct 2021 · CNR MHCC010110902019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Comm. Suit No.43/2021. 1 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.14). MHCC010110902019 Presented on : 01.11.2019 Registered on : 15.02.2019 Decided on : 05.10.2021 Duration : 01 Y, 11 M, 5 D IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY. COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.43 OF 2021 Exh. 14 M/s. Angel's Aluminium Corporation A Partnership Firm duty registered under Indian Partnership Act having registered office at 56, KIKA Street, 2nd floor, Gulalwadi, Mumbai – 400 004. ...Plaintiffs Versus Mr. Ratnakar Joshi Proprietor of M/s. Param Enterprises carrying on business at Plot No. A467 Road No.34, Wagle Industrial Estate, Thane – 400 604 ...Defendant Ms. Achala Hatode, Advocate for the plaintiff. None for the defendant – (Exparte). CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI R.R.BHAGWAT. (C.R.NO.31). DATE : 5th OCTOBER, 2021. JUDGMENT (EXPARTE) This is suit for recovery of money. -- 1 of 6 -- Comm. Suit No.43/2021. 2 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.14). 2. Case of the plaintiff, in brief, is as under : The plaintiff is a Partnership firm. Similarly, the defendant is Proprietary concerned. Pursuant to the order placed by the defendant, the plaintiffs sold and supplied Aluminum Sheets of various sizes to the defendant under three tax invoices total aggregating for Rs.9,82,319/ and submitted to the defendant for payment. The defendant received the material and tax invoices and he did not raise any objection regarding nature of the material received by him. As the defendant failed to make payment within 30 days from the date of tax invoice, advocate for the plaintiff issued demand notice dated 18.01.2019 to the defendant which defendant had duly received on 21.01.2019. However, inspite of repeated demands, the defendant failed and neglected to pay the balance amount. The plaintiff claimed the principal amount with interest at the rate of 24% p.a. i.e. Rs.17,71,607/ in toto. The plaintiff also sought relief of interest at the rate of 24% p.a. on the principal amount of Rs.9,82,319/ with cost. 3. The defendant was duly served with writ of summons as per affidavit of service (Exh.2), but he failed to appear and oppose the claim of the plaintiff. Therefore, my learned Predecessor passed the ex parte order against him on 17.03.2021. 4. PW1 Yuvraj Pawar, deposed on evidence affidavit ( Exh.3) and proved documents filed with list of documents (Exh.4). Proved documents are at Exh.5 to Exh.12. The plaintiff closed evidence vide pursis (Exh.13). I also heard learned counsel Ms. Achala Hatode, for the plaintiff. -- 2 of 6 -- Comm. Suit No.43/2021. 3 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.14). 5. After considering pleadings of the plaintiff and evidence on record, following points arose for my determination with my findings against them with reasons to follow : SR.NO. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Does the plaintiff prove that he is entitled to recover amount of Rs.17,71,607/ ? Partly affirmative as to principal amount 2. Does the plaintiff prove that he is entitled to interest on principal sum of Rs.9,82,319/ ? If yes, at what rate of interest ? In the Affirmative. @ 15% p.a. 3. What order as to cost ? As per final order. 4. What order and decree ? Suit is partly decreed. REASONS AS TO POINT NOS.1 TO 3 : 6. On perusal of contents in evidence affidavit (Exh.3) filed by witness PW1 Yuvraj Pawar, it appears that plaintiffs had supplied goods at the desired destination of the defendant as per order and accordingly, tax invoices (Exh.6 colly to Exh.8 colly) were raised. Original dischonoured cheque dated 27.10.2018 and photocopy of inward return memo, statement of account, demand notice dated 18.01.2019 along with postal receipts and acknowledgment are also placed on record vide Exh.09 colly, Exh.10 colly and Exh.11 colly. 7. PW1 Yuvraj Pawar has also proved power of attorney (Exh.05) authorizing him to represent the company in the court. From demand -- 3 of 6 -- Comm. Suit No.43/2021. 4 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.14). notice dated 18.01.2019 (Exh.11 colly.) it appears that the defendant has duly served with demand notice, but, he failed to reply the same. In such circumstances, there is no scope to disbelieve tax invoices (Exh.6 colly to Exh.8 colly), original dischonoured cheque dated 27.10.2018 (Exh.9 colly) and statement of account (Exh.10 colly). 8. It is established from oral and documentary evidence on record that the plaintiff had provided material to the defendant. The defendant failed to pay principal amount. In the light of all above discussion, the plaintiff has succeeded in proving his case with the help of sufficient oral and documentary evidence. So far as interest rate is concerned, it is mentioned at the bottom of tax invoices that interest at the rate of 30% p.a. will be charged if not paid within due date. The plaintiff has shown dates of invoices as due dates at the bottom of invoices. In short, the plaintiff is claiming interest on outstanding amount from the date of invoices, but he has ready with rate of interest from 30% to 24% p.a. Interest claimed by plaintiff is also exorbitant. Normally, interest in the range of 9% to 15% is claimed in commercial transaction. Therefore, reasonable reduction in the rate of interest is warranted. Cost of the suit is liable to be imposed on the defendant. In the light of above discussion, I record my findings as to points no.1 and 2 partly in the affirmative. Hence, I pass the following order : ORDER 1. Commercial Suit No.43 of 2021 is partly decreed. 2. The defendant is directed to pay the principal amount of Rs.9,82,319/ (Rupees Nine Lakhs Eighty Two Thousand Three Hundred and Nineteen only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 15% per annum from the date of invoices till its realization. 3. The defendant shall bear the costs of the suit. -- 4 of 6 -- Comm. Suit No.43/2021. 5 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.14). 4. Decree be drawn accordingly. (R.R.BHAGWAT) Judge City Civil & Sessions Court, Date : 05.10.2021 Mumbai -- 5 of 6 -- Comm. Suit No.43/2021. 6 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.14). “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 05.10.2021, 04.00 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (Shilpa P. Pawar) Stenographer (GradeI) Name of the Judge (with Court Room no.) HHJ Shri R.R.Bhagwat. (Court Room No.31). Date of Pronouncement of Judgment/Order 05.10.2021 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 05.10.2021 Judgment/Order uploaded on 05.10.2021 -- 6 of 6 --
