Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Kamal J. ChandwaneyVsMs Daya Builders And Ors

CNR MHCC01011026201931-COURT 31 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 07th November 2019

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103988/2019
Registration Date
02 Nov 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 04-11-2019
Business: Adv. Mr. Rafik for plaintiff present.
Adv. Ms. Zephyrina B. a/w adv. Mr. Prabhakar for defendant nos. 1 to 6 present, prayed for adjd. It is strongly objected by Adv. Mr. Rafik for plff. and prayed for cost of Rs. 5,000/-. He submits that neither original affidavit nor documents of deft are on record.
Registered NM no.3988/19 tendered by deft nos. 1 to 6.
On perusal of roznama, for three dates ld adv for deft nos. 1 to 6 was busy in another court and sought for adjd. The evidence of deft was closed on 24.06.2019.  It is observed that suit is 25 years old and plff is 80 years old.  Last chance was granted on 17.09.2019.
Considering above reason, adjd is granted subject to cost of Rs. 1,000/- be deposited to DLSA (Legal-Aid) on or before next date.
Next date 07.11.2019 is granted as prayed by adv. Mr. Prabhakar for deft nos. 1 to 6.
Matter is adjd. for NM reply on 07.11.2019.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2019

Date: 07-11-2019
Business: Adv. Mr. Rafik for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mr. K.C. Pandey for defendant present.
Cost to DSLA of Rs. 1,000/- is deposited by deft.
Heard argument of both side on NM.
Combine order all five NM is passed i.e. NM no.3988/19, NM no.3986/19, NM no.3987/19, NM no.3984/19 and NM no.3985/19.
Heard argument of both side on NM no.3988/19.
F.R.S.R. following order is passed on NM no.3988/19.
                                     ORDER
1. The order dtd. 24.06.2019 is set aside subject to cost of Rs. 800/- in each suit (800 X  5// 4,000/-) be paid to the plaintiff.
2. Three months time is given to the deft. to trace out the documents.
3. Deft. to file fresh evidence affidavit of witness Haresh Shah and compilation of document.
4. Defendant is at liberty to examine additional witness, if any.
5. In default of appropriate steps to file affidavit of witness of defendant, evidence of defendant will be closed.
6. At the request of advocate Pandey for deft. issue instruction to the Registrar of the City Civil Court of search copy of affidavit of compilation produced by Haresh Shah, as claimed to have produced by him in High Court in 2009, if any. (Original Civil High Court Suit no. 3067/1993 i.e. City Civil Court Suit No. 9279/1993) within two months.
7. NM no. 3988/2019 in suit no.8842/1993 (H.C. Suit no. 1440/1993) is disposed of accordingly. (Uncontested)
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 07-11-2019

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 111461/2019
Filing Date: 02-11-2019
First Hearing Date: 04th November 2019
Decision Date: 07th November 2019
Court Number And Judge: 31-COURT 31  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
07 Nov 2019

Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: N/m No. 3988/2019 in Suit No. 8842/1993, 1 Combine Order. N/m No. 3986/2019 in Suit No. 8961/1993, N/m No. 3987/2019 in Suit No. 9008/1993, N/m No. 3984/2019 in Suit No. 9279/1993, N/m No. 3985/2019 in Suit No. 9280/1993. IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3988 OF 2019 (CNR NO. MHCC010110262019) IN SUIT NO. 8842 OF 1993 (CNR NO. MHCC010100482012) (HIGH COURT SUIT NO.1440 OF 1993) Kamal J.…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.