Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mr. Ritesh Amritlal PatelVsMr. Rajesh Amritlal Patel And Anr

CNR MHCC0101098920193-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 04th March 2020

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103967/2019
Registration Date
01 Nov 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mr. Ritesh Amritlal Patel

    Respondent

    1. 1Mr. Rajesh Amritlal Patel And Anr

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 14-11-2019
Business: Plaintiff present.
Adv. Mangesh Chavan for plaintiff present.
defendants present.
Adv. Jain for defendant no. 1 present and filed original NM no. 3967/19 along with affidavit.
Matter stands Adj for NM reply to 17.12.19.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 17-12-2019

Date: 17-12-2019
Business: Adv. Chavan for plaintiff present.
Adv. Bharat Jain for defendant no. 1 present.
Adv. Sanket Tawade for defendant no.2 present.
Matter stands Adj for filing reply to NM on 09.01.2020.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2020

Date: 09-01-2020
Business: Plaintiff and defendant no. 1 present.
Adv. Mangesh Chavan for plaintiff present.
It is submitted that there is possibility of settlement between the parties. Hence, matter referred to mediation.
Matter stands Adj for Mediation report to 04.03.2020.
Next Purpose: MEDIATION REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2020

Date: 04-03-2020
Business: Adv. Mangesh Chavan for plaintiff present.
Defendant no. 1 present in person.
Manisha Jain, representative of advocate for defendant no. 1 present.
Matter was referred to mediation, but the mediation was failed, as per mediation report dated 24.02.2020.
Mediation report received from mediation centre dated 24.02.2020.
Heard Ld. counsel for plaintiff and defendant no. 1 on NM no. 3967/19 for condonation of delay for 43 days in filing WS. It is supported by an affidavit of defendant no. 1. Ld. counsel for plaintiff has no objection to allow the motion. Hence, NM no. 3967/19 is allowed and delay of 43 days is condoned in the interest of justice.
In view of the above, the defendant no. 1 shall file his WS on record on or before next date.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 04-03-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 111359/2019
Filing Date: 01-11-2019
First Hearing Date: 14th November 2019
Decision Date: 04th March 2020
Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    04 Mar 2020
    Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: 04.03.2020
63
CORAM : HIS HONOR JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT
SHRI. V.V. VIDWANS (Court Room No. 03)
SU 1499/19
@ NM 3967/19
Ex5
Adv. Mangesh Chavan for plaintiff present.
Defendant no. 1 present in person.
Manisha Jain, representative of advocate for defendant no. 1
present.
Matter was referred to mediation, but the mediation was failed, as
per mediation report dated 24.02.2020.
Mediation report received from mediation centre dated
24.02.2020.
Heard Ld. counsel for plaintiff and defendant no. 1 on NM no.
3967/19 for condonation of delay for 43 days in filing WS. It is
supported by an affidavit of defendant no. 1. Ld. counsel for
plaintiff has no objection to allow the motion. Hence, NM no.
3967/19 is allowed and delay of 43 days is condoned in the
interest of justice.
In view of the above, the defendant no. 1 shall file his WS on
record on or before next date.
Matter stands Adj for filing WS on defendant no. 1 to
22.04.2020.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.