Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 1

CNR MHCC01010851201922 Nov 2019
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 1 · 22 Nov 2019 · CNR MHCC010108512019

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 1 Ad-Int Order- Draft NM in SU2792-19
IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY
AT MUMBAI.
ORDER ON AD INTERIM RELIEF ON
DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION
IN
SUIT NO. 2792 OF 2019
(CNR no. MHCC010108512019)
Mr. inayatullah Mohd Hanif Seliya ]
Age : 41 years, Occ Business ]
Having premise at Unit No.B5 & B6, ]
Narayan Plaza, 1st Floor, Opp. Boomrang Building, ]
Chandivali Farm Road, Sakinaka, Mumbai 400 072. ]... Plaintiff
Versus
The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai, ]
having its Head Office at Annexe Building, ]
Mahapalika Marg, Fort, Mumbai400 001. ]....Defendant
Appearances:
Ld. Advocate Mr. S. K. Dubey for the Plaintiff.
Ld. Advocate Mr. Giri for defendant/MCGM.
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SHRI C. V. MARATHE
(Court Room no. 8)
(I/C Judge of C.R. 11)
DATED : 22nd November, 2019
O R A L O R D E R O N A D I N T E R I M R E L I E F
1. Perused Notice of Motion, affidavit along with the same,
record of this case and heard both sides. In this matter challenging
notice under Section 354(A) of Mumbai Municipal Corporation
-- 1 of 3 --
2 Ad-Int Order- Draft NM in SU2792-19
Act,1888 (hereinafter "MMC Act") dated 12.06.2019, Ld. Advocate for
the plaintiff has submitted that said notice was never served to the
plaintiff, without such service speaking order was passed on 25.06.2019
and the plaintiff after coming to know of the said order filed reply on
23.10.2019. Ld. Advocate for the defendant/MCGM has denied that the
notice was not served to the plaintiff but no documents are tendered by
defendant/MCGM in support of the case that the notice was duly served
to the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled for adinterim relief in
terms of prayer clause(a) till passing of a fresh order after considering
the reply of plaintiff dated 22.10.2019. If such order will be adverse to
plaintiff's interest the same shall not be enforced for a period of one
week from service of order to the plaintiff. Till such order the plaintiff
shall not change, alter, modify the status of the suit premises.
(C. V. Marathe)
Judge,
Date : 22.11.2019 City Civil Court, Gr. Mumbai.
Dictated on : 22.11.2019
Transcribed on : 22.11.2019
Signed by HHJ on : 22.11.2019
-- 2 of 3 --
3 Ad-Int Order- Draft NM in SU2792-19
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 22.11.2019 at 5.29 p.m.
NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mrs. Gayatri P. Acharekar
Name of the Judge (With Court
Room no.)
HHJ Shri. C. V. Marathe
C.R. no.08 (I/C Judge of C.R.11)
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGMENT/ORDER
22/11/2019
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by
P.O. on
22/11/2019
JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded
on
22/11/2019
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.