Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 03 Mar 2021 · CNR MHCC010108252019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Judgment Exh.10 1 Sum.Suit 1081/19 MHCC010108252019 Presented on : 22-10-2019 Registered on : 08-11-2019 Decided on : 03-03-2021 Duration : 1 years, 4 months, 12 days IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1081 OF 2019 Premchand Gulabchandji Age 77 years, of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant, carrying on business of Money Lending at and from 46, Modi Street, Ground Floor, Fort, Mumbai 400 001 ...Plaintiff Versus 1. Vinod Yadav Nikam, age not known, of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant working for gain G.P.O. Mumbai, Delivery Section, Shorting MTS Mumbai 400 001 And residing at P.U.T. Colony, Bldg., No. A-12, Room No. 16 Mulund, Mumbai 400 086 2. Suryakant Rajaram Thakur age not known, of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant working for gain G.P.O. Mumbai, Delivery Section, Shorting MTS Mumbai 400 001 And residing at Mahatma Phule Nagar, Ekvira Chawl, Room No.25, Chawl No.1, Mankhurd, Mumbai 400 088 ….Defendants -- 1 of 5 -- Judgment Exh.10 2 Sum.Suit 1081/19 Appearances:- Advocate Mr. Ramesh Jain for the Plaintiff. Defendants Ex-parte. CORAM : HIS HONOUR AD-HOC JUDGE DEEPAK L. BHAGWAT (C.R. NO. 28) DATE : 3rd MARCH, 2021 J U D G M E N T 1. This is Summary Suit for recovery of amount of Rs.29,335/- (Rupees Twenty Nine Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Five Only) with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 15% p.a.. 2. According to the plaintiff, in consideration of Rs.25,000/- obtained by the defendants from the plaintiff, the defendants executed promissory note of same amount on 24.07.2018 in favour of the plaintiff. By same promissory note the defendant promised to pay to the plaintiff said amount of Rs.25,000/- with interest at the rate of 1.25% per month. However, the defendant failed to pay the said amount to the plaintiff inspite of demands. Despite legal notice of demand dated 07.05.2019, the defendant failed to pay the said amount. At the institution if of the suit the amount payable by the defendant was Rs.29,335/-. Therefore, the plaintiff claimed decree for recovery of said amount with pendente lite and future interest. 3. Despite service of summons the defendant No.1 failed to appear. Therefore, the suit proceeded ex-parte against Defendant No.1. Vide pursis Exh.7 the plaintiff unconditionally withdrawn the suit against defendant No.2. Therefore, the suit proceeded only against defendant No.1. -- 2 of 5 -- Judgment Exh.10 3 Sum.Suit 1081/19 4. Considering the material on record and submissions made on behalf of the plaintiff points arise for determination along with my findings thereon for the reasons recorded are as under:- POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of the amount as prayed? Affirmative. 2. At what rate of pendente lite and future interest ? 12% p.a. 3. What order & decree? As per final order REASONS AS TO POINTS NO.1 to 3:- 5. The plaintiff filed his Claim Affidavit of his constituted Attorney PW Mahindra at Exh.8 and also produced documents with list Exh.9. The testimony of PW Mahindra and the documents as Demand promissory note reveal that in consideration of amount of Rs.25,000/- given by the plaintiff to the defendants, the defendants executed demand promissory note of same amount payable with interest at the rate of 18% p.a.. Despite legal notice dtd.07.05.2019, the defendants failed to pay the amount to the plaintiff. Thus, the Claim Affidavit, documents on record and the circumstance that defendants failed to appear and contest/challenge the suit, proved the case of the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of the amount as prayed. Considering overall facts and circumstance it is just and proper to grant pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 12% p.a.. Hence, point -- 3 of 5 -- Judgment Exh.10 4 Sum.Suit 1081/19 No.1 is answered in the Affirmative and point No.2 is answered as 12% p.a.. In view of Para-499 of Civil Manual Court fees has to be refunded to the plaintiff, this being summary suit where the defendant did not appear. In answer to point No.3 order as follows is passed:- ORDER 1. The suit is ex-parte decreed with costs as under. 2. The Defendant No.1 shall pay to the plaintiff amount of Rs.29,335/- (Rupees Twenty Nine Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Five Only) with simple interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from the date of suit till realization of the amount. 3. The suit against defendant No.2 is disposed as withdrawn unconditionally. 4. Court fees be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules. 5. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (Deepak L. Bhagwat) Ad-hoc Judge, City Civil Court, Mumbai Date: 03.03.2021 Dictated on : 03.03.2021 Transcribed on : 03.03.2021 Date of sign : 04.03.2021 -- 4 of 5 -- Judgment Exh.10 5 Sum.Suit 1081/19 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE & TIME : 04.03.2021 5.10 p.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : S.S.BATHE Name of Judge (with Court Room No.) Shri.D.L.Bhagwat (C.R.NO.28) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT /ORDER 03.03.2021 JUDGMENT /ORDER signed by P.O. on 04.03.2021 JUDGMENT /ORDER uploaded on 04.03.2021 -- 5 of 5 --
