Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Mangilal Champlal JainVsMs Prime Trade Test Centre Pvt Ltd

CNR MHCC0101071920192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 12th December 2019

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101899/2019
Registration Date
22 Oct 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mangilal Champlal Jain

    Respondent

    1. 1Ms Prime Trade Test Centre Pvt Ltd

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 22-10-2019
Business: Plaintiff absent.
Adv. Bansod for plaintiff present.
Adv. Pandya for defendant present.
Plaintiff tendered registered Chamber summons 1999/18
Defendant sought time to file reply.
O- Time is granted.
Adv. For plaintiff requested to hear NM after decision of Chamber summons. At present matter is adjourned for Chamber summons reply and NM hearing to 1.11.2019
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 01-11-2019

Date: 01-11-2019
Business: Plaintiff absent.
Adv. Avanti Mankar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Pandya for defendant present.
KB
LO
Adv. Jitendra Shukla along with Adv. Bansod for plaintiff present.
KB
LO
Application filed by plaintiff for permission to file rejoinder to reply to notice of motion T.O.R. Other side to say.
Copy be served on other side.
Advocate for defendant sought time to file reply to chamber summons
O  Time is granted.
Adjourned for say and reply to 14.11.2019
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 14-11-2019

Date: 14-11-2019
Business: Plaintiff present.
Adv. Jitendra Shukla for plaintiff present.
Adv.Pandya for defendant present.
Reply filed by defendant to the application filed by plaintiff to file rejoinder.
Order on application dated 1.11.2019 filed by plaintiff
Perused application, reply of defendants.  Heard respective counsel for parties. Plaintiffs want to file rejoinder to the reply of defendants.  Defendants opposed application on the count of gross delay and negligence.  It is true that there is gross delay in making present application.  However, in the interest of justice and fair trial plaintiffs are permitted to file rejoinder confined strictly to the matters of reply filed by the defendants subject to deposit of costs of Rs 1000/- in DLSA Mumbai, within period of one week.
Adjourned for direction to 12.12.2019.
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 12-12-2019

Date: 12-12-2019
Business: Plaintiff present.
Rejoinder to reply of defendant to Notice of motioned tendered by adv. for plaintiff. t.o.r.
Copy served to the defendant.
KB
LO
Adv. Mangesh Bansode for plaintiff present.
He not pressed Chamber summons No. 1899/19
Order
As plaintiff not pressed Chamber summons 1899/19 so it is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Matter is adjourned for NM hearing to 15.01.2020
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 12-12-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 111527/2019
Filing Date: 22-10-2019
First Hearing Date: 22nd October 2019
Decision Date: 12th December 2019
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    12 Dec 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 12.12.2019
SU 3512/13
CS 1899/13
NM 3485/13
CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02)
Plaintiff present.
Rejoinder to reply of defendant to Notice of motioned tendered by
adv. for plaintiff. t.o.r.
Copy served to the defendant.
KB
LO
Adv. Mangesh Bansode for plaintiff present.
He not pressed Chamber supmmons No. 1899/19
Order :
As plaintiff not pressed Chamber summons 1899/19 so it is dismissed
for want of prosecution.
Matter is adjourned for NM hearing to 15.01.2020
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.