Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 23 Jun 2023 · CNR MHCC010106542019
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: Order in Chamber Summons 1 No. 1883 of 2019 MHCC010106542019 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1883 of 2019. IN S. C. SUIT NO.4700 of 2009. Madhukar Ramchandra Keni Karta. ...Applicant/ Plaintiff. In the matter of :- Madhukar Ramchandra Keni Karta. ..Plaintiff V/s. 1. Shree Nityanand Ashram Trust and Ors. ..Defendants. Appearances :- Adv. Babu i/b Adv. G.S.Bhat for plaintiff. Adv. Ansari i/b Adv. Mishra for defendant. Coram : Shri.U. C. Deshmukh. C.R. No.: 59. Date : 23/06/2023 ORAL ORDER This Chamber Summons is moved by the plaintiff to add -- 1 of 4 -- Order in Chamber Summons 2 No. 1883 of 2019 proposed defendant Nos. 5 to 9. 2. The contention of the plaintiff that during the pendency of the suit, defendant No.2 has died. There is trust of defendant. After death of defendant No.2 there is change in the name of the trustees of the defendant. Accordingly, change report is filed before concern office of public trust. She filed Schedule-III of Register of Public Trusts wherein all proposed defendants are mentioned. It is contention of the plaintiff that the suit is filed for eviction of suit premises. Therefore, proposed defendants, who are new trustees of the trust of the defendants are necessary party. Hence, this Chamber Summons. 3. Defendants have filed reply and resisted the Chamber Summons on the ground that Chamber Summons is not maintainable as the plaintiff is not obtained sanction under section 50 of Bombay Public Trust Act. It is also their contention that there are several heirs of deceased Madhukar Keni hence, the suit is not maintainable against the one co-owner. Hence, prayed to reject the Notice of Motion. 4. Ld. advocate for plaintiff argued that defendant are sued in the capacity of trust and not in their personal capacity. They admits there is 56 days of delay to move the Chamber Summons. Therefore, prayed to allow the Chamber Summons on the reasonable costs. On the contrary, it is contention of the Ld. advocate for the defendant that heavy costs imposed upon the plaintiff as he failed to move this Chamber Summons within a time. -- 2 of 4 -- Order in Chamber Summons 3 No. 1883 of 2019 5. It is specific contention of the defendants that change the report annexed and marked at Exh. A alongwith Chamber Summons. Hence, plaintiff cannot say that he was not aware about the names of proposed defendants. There is no dispute that proposed defendants are trustees of the trust which is defendant. It is also not in dispute that there is change in the name of the trustees. The defendant agitate that the plaintiff failed to move Chamber Summons within prescribed period of limitation. It is necessary to note that the change report is not a document known to any person. The suit is filed for recovery of the possession of the immovable property. The plaintiff is claiming the title and ownership of the property. In such circumstances, to avoid further round of litigating, it is just and proper to permit the plaintiff to add proposed defendants as a party to the suit. Considering the delay to file this Chamber Summons, costs of Rs.2,000/- needs to be imposed to meet end of justice. Defendants are trustees and it is contention of the plaintiff are they have made encroachment over the suit property. In such circumstances, it is just and proper to deposit the costs of Rs.2000/- to DLSA. Accordingly, following order is passed : ORDER 1. Chamber Summons no. 1883 of 2019 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) by depositing an amount of Rs. 2,000/- (Rs. Two Thousand Only) to DLSA. 2. The plaintiff shall carry out amendment within 14 days from the date of this order. 3. On payment of aforesaid costs, the plaintiff shall submit the copy of amended plaint on or before next date. -- 3 of 4 -- Order in Chamber Summons 4 No. 1883 of 2019 4. Chamber Summons No. 1883 of 2019 is disposed off accordingly. (U.C.Deshmukh) Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court Date.:23.06.2023 Greater Bombay (CR 59) Declared on : 23.06.2023 Dictated on : 23.06.2023 Transcribed on : 05.07.2023 Checked on : 05.07.2023 Signed on : 07.07.2023 ERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 07.07.2023 at 06.05 p.m. Mrs. P.R.Wagh UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (with Court Room No.) HHJ SHRI.U.C.Deshmukh,(C.R.No.59) Judge.,City Civil & Sessions Court, Date of pronouncement of /Order 23.06.2023 Order signed by P.O. on 07.07.2023 order uploaded on 07.07.2023 -- 4 of 4 --
